<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why Business Process Management is more than BPEL</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/31/why-business-process-management-is-more-than-bpel.aspx</link><description>I recently heard a presentation from a competitor to Microsoft Biztalk talk about their business process modeling tool. It competes with Biztalk in many ways: visual programming, rules engine, etc. However, the salesman said something that threw me off,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Why Business Process Management is more than BPEL</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/31/why-business-process-management-is-more-than-bpel.aspx#4150417</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4150417</guid><dc:creator>Anil Datt</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nick,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What I see is that because BPEL and BPMN emerged as standards for BPM it has been used as the sales buzz word by the vendors. A tech savy manager would know that BPEL is not just enough. The lists you are looking at probably is the holy grail of BPM. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think a lot of standards would emerge in the coming years to to address specific needs in the BPM world. For example BPEL4People an exention to BPEL language to address the workflow would probably replace the proprietary solutions vendors are providing now. When they are compliant this would be another sales buzz word :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anil Datt&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why Business Process Management is more than BPEL</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/31/why-business-process-management-is-more-than-bpel.aspx#4153656</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:30:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4153656</guid><dc:creator>peter foley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Spot on again. Our homegrown system does most of the list above. One thin we do that I haven't seen anyone else do is let people &amp;quot;execute&amp;quot; the business processes. A person is presented with a graphical model of the BP and performs the activities. As they go they inform the model displayer of the status of their actions. The status is used by the model displayer to determine the next activity the person can work on. Management information is collected as the BP &amp;quot;executes&amp;quot;. Help on how to do an activity is aslo associated with the model. An activity can also start another BP or an automated workflow.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New and Notable 180</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/31/why-business-process-management-is-more-than-bpel.aspx#4379289</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:28:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4379289</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So, I am totally thrilled in my new role at Neudesic , where today, I got to spend quite a bit of time&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New and Notable 180</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/31/why-business-process-management-is-more-than-bpel.aspx#4379307</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:30:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4379307</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So, I am totally thrilled in my new role at Neudesic , where today, I got to spend quite a bit of time&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>