<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Having a High Bus Factor</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2005/06/28/HighBusFactor.aspx</link><description>A friend of mine pointed out an interesting post by Scott Hanselman that used a clever phrase: "having a High Bus Factor" which is to say: if the original developer of a bit of code is ever hit by a bus, you are toast. The example that Scott gave was</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Having a High Bus Factor</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2005/06/28/HighBusFactor.aspx#433473</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:36:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:433473</guid><dc:creator>David O'Hara</dc:creator><description>I have to admit to having created (as well as inheriting) some pretty awful pieces of code as well. My feelings are that with unit tests, you can certainly mitigate *some* of the hassle but it should still be the devs responsibility for writing maintainable code. Like doctors, we should first and always &amp;quot;do no harm&amp;quot;. :)</description></item><item><title>Architecting by Coincidence</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2005/06/28/HighBusFactor.aspx#999342</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:11:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:999342</guid><dc:creator>Lorenzo Barbieri @ UGIblogs!</dc:creator><description /></item></channel></rss>