<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>A single taxonomy of business capabilities</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2006/05/16/598889.aspx</link><description>I've blogged in the past about the value of standards. I also have seen many efforts to create taxonomies: a standardized breakdown of some general area, down to specifics. One that is popular with the Microsoft Enterprise Architecture team is the MS</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: A single taxonomy of business capabilities</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2006/05/16/598889.aspx#598949</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 18:01:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:598949</guid><dc:creator>Gabriel Morgan</dc:creator><description>I have had some experience using MS Motion but only limitted so my comments are part educated and gut feel so beware.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MS Motion is a methodology and tool for describing at the CxO level a given line of business. It comes with some existing business capability taxonomies from past customer engagements with customers in different verticals or domains to reference only. These taxonomies represent past thinking for a specific business vertical or domain to improve productivity and accuracy while executing the MS Motion Methodology. &amp;nbsp;It's up to the MS Motion Methodology that actually creates the business capability architecture for a specific customer's line of business. Anyway, enough about the taxonomies created as these will change and be refined over time as they are reused for different customers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While reading your blog. I think that you are correct. I wonder if i could take a moment and reply with some thinking I have around the value of such a thing as business capability architecture using MS Motion. I think that there are number of values to be reaped; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, it is a catalyst for determining quickly where a butiness should focus and look for opportunities to improve. Improvements in business outsourcing opportunities, improvements in business process (using Six Sigma for example), improvements in informaiton and improvements in IT solutions to enable the business.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, it provides a simple architectural view the business understands and manages themselves that is ocnnected to the other architecture views. So, when the business makes adjustments to their business capability architecture, usually in the form of setting priorities based on business strategy, the other architecture views are 'informed' through their relationship to the business capability to look for ways to improve which may be one or more changes in the business process and IT environment (applications, information or IT products). So, the business manage their business &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's more I have to say but I'll leave it for later...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;Gabriel </description></item><item><title>re: A single taxonomy of business capabilities</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2006/05/16/598889.aspx#616212</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 23:03:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:616212</guid><dc:creator>Carolyn Andrews</dc:creator><description>Hello - I'm looking for a business capability Taxonomy for use at Hewlett Packard - are any of the ones referenced in your blog available?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, Carolyn</description></item><item><title>Business &amp;raquo; Inside Architecture : A single taxonomy of business capabilities</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2006/05/16/598889.aspx#8169430</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:53:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8169430</guid><dc:creator>Business » Inside Architecture : A single taxonomy of business capabilities</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://businessethicsarticleblog.info/inside-architecture-a-single-taxonomy-of-business-capabilities/"&gt;http://businessethicsarticleblog.info/inside-architecture-a-single-taxonomy-of-business-capabilities/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>SOA: Making the Paradigm Shift Part 1 of N</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2006/05/16/598889.aspx#8571509</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:36:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8571509</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Introduction and Context I have been giving an SOA talk, in various forms for several years, where I&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>SOA: Making the Paradigm Shift Part 1 of N</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2006/05/16/598889.aspx#9166357</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:51:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9166357</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Introduction and Context I have been giving an SOA talk, in various forms for several years, where I concentrate on various themes. For the benefit of many who have not gone to such talks, as well as for others, I have always wanted to start a written&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>