<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Preventing Ownerless Activities -- the &amp;quot;Blame the Computer&amp;quot; process modeling antipattern - part 2</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2008/07/06/process-and-it-budget-owned-by-the-same-person.aspx</link><description>In a prior post, I described a process modeling antipattern which I called " Blame the Computer ." The feedback helped me to realize that there's a deeper problem that we need to consider: alignment of ownership between process and IT. Ownership of a</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Preventing Ownerless Activities -- the "Blame the Computer" process modeling antipattern - part 2</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2008/07/06/process-and-it-budget-owned-by-the-same-person.aspx#8712456</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:49:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8712456</guid><dc:creator>Richard Veryard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Forget Mars and Venus. The IT budget is from Jupiter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(In my version of the IT solar system, ITIL is from Saturn and SOA is from Uranus.)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>