<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Comparing the MSTest and Nunit Frameworks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx</link><description>I haven't seen much information online comparing the similarities and differences between the Nunit and MSTest Frameworks. Here I will define the similarities and some of the differences. If there is anything else which you come upon, please do add it</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Comparing the MSTest and Nunit Frameworks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#1968442</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:42:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1968442</guid><dc:creator>buckh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Are there plans to add support for NUnit's Category attribute?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://nunit.org/index.php?p=category&amp;amp;r=2.4"&gt;http://nunit.org/index.php?p=category&amp;amp;r=2.4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Buck&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>MSTest\NUnit\MbUnit attributes</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#1973648</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:17:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1973648</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Stopford's Weblog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Naysawn Naderi has a matrix of attributes between NUnit and MSTest . To balance MbUnit in this matrix,&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>MSTest and Nunit Attributes Compared</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#2007778</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:31:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2007778</guid><dc:creator>Derik Whittaker</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I just came across a great blog entry that compares the different attributes in both MSTest and NUnit.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Matriz de atributos MSTest versus NUnit</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#2008078</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 01:50:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2008078</guid><dc:creator>Console.Write(this.Opinion)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Naderi &amp;#233; PM (Program Manager) do VSTS Test Team e escrever bastante sobre testes unit&amp;#225;rios utilizando&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Comparing the MSTest and Nunit Frameworks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#2026269</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:51:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2026269</guid><dc:creator>nnaderi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;From Buck: &amp;quot;Are there plans to add support for NUnit's Category attribute?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have been discussing this. &amp;nbsp;I think that it would be quite beneficial. &amp;nbsp;Do you prefer it to the test lists that we have implemented?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Comparing the MSTest and Nunit Frameworks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#2547072</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 16:57:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2547072</guid><dc:creator>sdhebert</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What is the MSTest equivilant of 'Explicit'. &amp;nbsp;The combination of Explicit and Category is extremely helpful.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>NUnit &amp;amp; MSTest working in harmony</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#2554169</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 01:10:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2554169</guid><dc:creator>Jess Chadwick</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Now, I'm not claiming to be anything remotely close to a Test-Driven Development expert - heck, I only&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>NUnit now supports [AssemblyInitialize] and [AssemblyCleanUp]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#4111244</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 03:12:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4111244</guid><dc:creator>Ross Bradbury</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that [AssemblyInitialize] and &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[AssemblyCleanUp] in MSTest correspond to &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[SetUp] and [TearDown] in the [SetUpFixture] of NUnit.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Motley says: "Just use a batch file to run unit tests"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#4990324</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 04:53:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4990324</guid><dc:creator>Progressive Development</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Summary Motley: Just use a batch file to execute unit tests - it's easy and quick. Maven: Use a unit&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Motley says: "Just use a batch file to run unit tests"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#4990396</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 05:05:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4990396</guid><dc:creator>Noticias externas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Summary Motley: Just use a batch file to execute unit tests - it&amp;amp;#39;s easy and quick. Maven: Use a unit&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Equivalent to dynamic test cases in MBunit also lacking</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#5773897</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:19:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5773897</guid><dc:creator>acyment</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;MBUnit's TestSuiteFixture is a TestClass than can be populated at runtime (e.g. by fetching data from files in folders). Only way I know of doing that with MSTest is by adding an MSBuild task that runs before project compilation, that generates source code (i.e. alla CodeSmith), that will later be compiled by CSC and finally detected as a test by MSTest.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Comparing the MSTest and Nunit Frameworks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/01/mstest-vs-nunit-frameworks.aspx#9938684</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:16:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9938684</guid><dc:creator>Subrahmanyam K</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Some major differences in MSTest compared to NUnit is that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Inheritance is not supported if the base class is in different assembly&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) ClassInitialize and ClassCleanup attribute methods MUST be static which enforces a lot of restriction in actually using those attributes&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>