<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>When is a phone not a phone?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/officerocker/archive/2007/04/02/when-is-a-phone-not-a-phone.aspx</link><description>Reading accountingweb today, there is a rant about blackberry's - basically documenting all the tax issues with classifying a pda as "telephone apparatus" and the challenges for employers as they try to classify the devices given to their employees. I</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title> OfficeRocker When is a phone not a phone |  Portable Greenhouse</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/officerocker/archive/2007/04/02/when-is-a-phone-not-a-phone.aspx#9677006</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:34:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9677006</guid><dc:creator> OfficeRocker When is a phone not a phone |  Portable Greenhouse</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://portablegreenhousesite.info/story.php?id=14734"&gt;http://portablegreenhousesite.info/story.php?id=14734&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>