Welcome to MSDN Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

I often find myself saying, "I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature."

"That feature" is something aggressively user-hostile, like forcing a shortcut into the Quick Launch bar or the Favorites menu, like automatically turning on a taskbar toolbar, like adding an icon to the notification area that conveys no useful information but merely adds to the clutter, or (my favorite) like adding an extra item to the desktop context menu that takes several seconds to initialize and gives the user the ability to change some obscure feature of their video card.

Allow me to summarize the guidance:

The Quick Launch bar and Favorites menu belong to the user. There is intentionally no interface to manipulate shortcuts in the Quick Launch bar. We saw what happened to the Favorites menu and learned our lesson: Providing a programmatic interface to high-valued visual real estate results in widespread abuse. Of course, this doesn't stop people from hard-coding the path to the Quick Launch directory—too bad the name of the directory isn't always "Quick Launch"; the name can change based on what language the user is running. But that's okay, I mean, everybody speaks English, right?

There is no programmatic interface to turn on a taskbar toolbar. Again, that's because the taskbar is a high-value piece of the screen and creating a programmatic interface can lead to no good. Either somebody is going to go in and force their toolbar on, or they're going to go in and force a rival's toolbar off. Since there's no programmatic interface to do this, these programs pull stunts like generating artificial user input to simulate the right-click on the taskbar, mousing to the "Toolbars" menu item, and then selecting the desired toolbar. The taskbar context menu will never change, right? Everybody speaks English, right?

The rule for taskbar notifications is that they are there to, well, notify the user of something. Your print job is done. Your new hardware device is ready to use. A wireless network has come into range. You do not use a notification icon to say "Everything is just like it was a moment ago; nothing has changed." If nothing has changed, then say nothing.

Many people use the notification area to provide quick access to a running program, which runs counter to the guidance above. If you want to provide access to a program, put a shortcut on the Start menu. Doesn't matter whether the program is running already or not. (If it's not running, the Start menu shortcut runs it. If it is already running, the Start menu shortcut runs the program, which recognizes that it's already running and merely activates the already-running copy.)

While I'm here, I may as well remind you of the guidance for notification balloons: A notification balloon should only appear if there is something you want the user to do. It must be actionable.

BalloonAction
Your print job is complete. Go pick it up.
Your new hardware device is ready to use. Start using it.
A wireless network has come into range. Connect to it.

The really good balloons will tell the user what the expected action is. "A wireless network has come into range. Click here to connect to it." (Emphasis mine.)

Here are some bad balloons:

Bad BalloonAction?
Your screen settings have been restored. So what do you want me to do about it?
Your virtual memory swap file has been automatically adjusted. If it's automatic, what do I need to do?
Your clock has been adjusted for daylight saving time. Do you want me to change it back?
Updates are ready for you to install. So?

One of my colleagues got a phone call from his mother asking him what she she should do about a new error message that wouldn't go away. It was the "Updates are ready for you to install" balloon. The balloon didn't say what she should do next.

The desktop context menu extensions are the worst, since the ones I've seen come from video card manufacturers that provide access to something you do maybe once when you set up the card and then don't touch thereafter. I mean, do normal users spend a significant portion of their day changing their screen resolution and color warmth? (Who on a laptop would even want to change their screen resolution?) What's worse is that one very popular such extension adds an annoying two second delay to the appearance of the desktop context menu, consuming 100% CPU during that time. If you have a laptop with a variable-speed fan, you can hear it going nuts for a few seconds each time you right-click the desktop. Always good to chew up battery life initializing a context menu that nobody on a laptop would use anyway.

The thing is, all of these bad features were probably justified by some manager somewhere because it's the only way their feature would get noticed. They have to justify their salary by pushing all these stupid ideas in the user's faces. "Hey, look at me! I'm so cool!" After all, when the boss asks, "So, what did you accomplish in the past six months," a manager can't say, "Um, a bunch of stuff you can't see. It just works better." They have to say, "Oh, check out this feature, and that icon, and this dialog box." Even if it's a stupid feature.

As my colleague Michael Grier put it, "Not many people have gotten a raise and a promotion for stopping features from shipping."

Published Wednesday, November 01, 2006 7:00 AM by oldnewthing
Filed under:

Comments

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:10 AM by Tom

Great article, and I appreciate your frank views on this topic.  I am glad that someone is looking at things from the perspective of the user.  Like you, I am also annoyed by all the clutter of worthless links that applications install into the various areas of the shell.  High-level device drivers (those that also contain applications) are the worst offenders, IMO.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:10 AM by Eric

And yet, every time you download an update to Outlook 2003 (such as a Junk Filter update), it *still* reinstalls the stupid Outlook icon in the Quick Launch Bar. I think I've now removed it several hundred times (between multiple computers, reinstalls, etc).

If even Office gets it wrong, there's not much hope for the rest of the world.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:19 AM by Sean

Updates are ready for you to install. So?

So install them.

I actually do like this message, because I have my automatic updates set to only download and notify me that they are there. Because if I have them automatically install I run the chance that my computer will be forcefully rebooted should I be away from my desk during those 5 minutes that I am asked if it should reboot, killing every running program wether or not the information is saved (and occationally corrupting databases).

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:24 AM by Mal

@Sean

I think the point is that the message should say "Updates are ready for you to install. Click here to install them."

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:26 AM by dave

How is the implied action of "Your print job is complete" any different from "Updates are ready for you to install?" At least the latter says *who* is supposed to take the action.

Since upgrading to IE7 on my notebook I was getting the VM balloon at least once a day, and *that* one is annoying.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:37 AM by Adam Vandenberg

"(Who on a laptop would even want to change their screen resolution?)"

Someone who uses external monitors, and bounces between one on their desk and projects in conference rooms with different optimal resolutions.

Still doesn't excuse the video card manufacturers, though.

# Just because you can make it a choice doesn't mean you have to

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:46 AM by Andrew Kimpton

Raymond Chen (a longtime engineer at Microsoft) wrote an article today lamenting peoples abuses of some...

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:54 AM by Damian

Ahem, language bar? And, eh, what about MSN messenger?

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:56 AM by J

Different usage patterns for different people, I suppose...  When I install a program that I know I'm going to use frequently, I usually tell it NOT to put an item in the start menu and ONLY put an icon in the quick-launch bar.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:58 AM by Dewi Morgan

I have to say that I much appreciate some "do nothing" notices. The important thing is that they should notify me of *uncommon( events.

"Your clock has been adjusted for daylight saving time."

I love this one. Which is what prompted this comment. It happens twice a year, so it's not a biggie. I don't have a TV, I don't tend to read newspapers. This notification is the only way I know to change all my clocks. I appreciate it. Perhaps it should be turnoffable, but on-by-default seems right to me for such uncommon notifications.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:04 AM by Vorn

"Your clock has been adjusted for Daylight Savings Time, by moving one hour back.  If you haven't already, now might be a good time to change the settings on your other clocks."

Better?

Vorn

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:06 AM by Andrew Feldstein

I second what Eric said, and he should have added that Outlook also insists on putting itself in the notification area--thus "to provide quick access to a running program."

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:08 AM by Neal

The first thing I did after installing XP was to go through all the settings disabling all the annoyances that I could.  No more balloon tips, no quick launch bars, etc. and a clean fast interface with no slow eye candy.  Also gone are the context menus that my video card just had to install...

TweakUI and group policy editor are my best friends, followed by regedit and XPLite to rid windows of all the stuff I'll NEVER use but that Microsoft refuses to let me uninstall because some misbehaving app that I'll never install expects it to be there.

Now if I could just get rid of that damn pinball folder that would even force its way back with system restore turned off. :)

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:11 AM by Adrian

I whole-heartedly agree with Ray on the philosophies here.  I wish more software companies would put the end-user first.  If you build a huge base of loyal users, business strategies and partnerships will follow.  You don't want to optimize for business case at the expense of the user.  So few software companies get that.

My least favorite balloon tip is "You have unused icons on your desktop."  (1) No, I don't.  (2) When you dismiss it, it pops up a second time a few seconds later.  Grr!

I hate the printing one, too.  It doesn't tell you when the print job is finished, it tells you when the data has been sent to the printer.  That's not actionable.  Here at work, the printer can take more than five minutes to warm up and print once it has received the job.  At home, the printer is 12 inches from the monitor.  I know when the job is done.  Please stop blocking my status bar with the redundant balloon tip.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:19 AM by G D

My biggest peeve is Symantec's moronic Anti-virus notification balloon.  

First, it's not actionable: "Oh, hey! I automatically installed your anti-virus updates!" Great.  Thanks.  Why are you ringing the "Everything's OK!" alarm?

Second, and far more heinous, it steals the focus when it's clanging away on the everything's OK alarm!  That is the most godawfully irritating thing on the planet when you're typing a document or in a full-screen game.

Third, I can't even find a way to turn that horrible notification balloon off.  I'm planning on getting my antivirus from a different vendor next year because of this single, solitary UI irritation.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:44 AM by Scott

How about Quicktime?  Why does Quicktime even have an icon in the notification area?

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:46 AM by Centaur

+1 against “You have unused icons on your desktop”.

No, I don’t, these are not icons (as in .ico files), they are shortcuts.

“Okay, you have unused *shortcuts* on your desktop.”

Yes, I do, because some misbehaving installer has placed shortcuts on my otherwise clean desktop.

“So, you seem to want them off…”

Yes, I want them off.

“So, *click here* to…”

To move these useless shortcuts into an equally useless “Useless shortcuts” subdirectory? What happened to good old Recycle Bin (which I personally always keep disabled, so whatever you move there simply disappears, no second thoughts, you’ve decided… decided…)?

But, if I close it, it will pop up again.

Okay. I click.

“Oops. I told the system to move them, but it said, ‘ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED’.”

Of course it did. Because I installed that software as Administrator, and it littered over the All Users desktop, not mine, and we wouldn’t possibly want to disappoint some other poor user of this computer by moving his cheese (never mind that I’m the sole and only user of my PC), would we? So the shortcuts in question are writable (and movable) by Administrators, and I am currently just one of Users, and I can only read and execute them. (Off with their heads! Oh, that doesn’t count as an execution, what a pity…)

So, no can do. “Well, do you want at least to hide them?”

Can I?

“Uhh… no.”

(*Sigh*) Dismissed, then. See you next month…

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:47 AM by Mitch Tenderson

Raymond:

>I mean, do normal users spend a significant >portion of their day changing their screen >resolution and color warmth? (Who on a laptop >would even want to change their screen >resolution?)

I do. Typical day: Use the laptop on the train to my office. Arrive at work and plug in an extra monitor (change resolution!). Go home and use laptop on train (change resolution!). Plug in tv since I use my laptop as a DVD player (change resolution!). Use laptop in the room with network connection (change resolution!).

So yes, people actually do change their resolution, especially on laptops. And my video manufacturer's context menu is much easier to use than XP:s confusing five step dialog.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:48 AM by BryanK

I feel the need to point out that Raymond often writes this type of article to point out the errors of various Microsoft programs to the people concerned, without specifically mentioning them.  I'd bet that he was thinking about Outlook, possibly the language bar, and probably MSN messenger.  But it looks like he only specifically mentioned notifications from the shell.

(Except for the video drivers.  For those, it's probably obvious to us who he means in those comments, but he still didn't specifically say.  I'd bet the legal people are happier that way.)

(G D: I don't know much about them, but I've heard good things about both Avast and AntiVir, regarding the viruses they detect that some of the more well-known AV programs don't.  Might be worth a shot at least; I believe both are free downloads.)

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:01 PM by Jonathan

Your clock has been adjusted for daylight saving time. - So it means I don't have to change it manually like they said on TV, good for me!

Updates are ready for you to install. - Should add "when you're ready to install them and probably reboot, click here"

"Who on a laptop would even want to change their screen resolution?"

When 2 people share it:

- One uses the hi-DPI native res

- The other has limited sight, and like a lower res, and doesn't care about scaling artifacts.

That's what happens with my desktop computer (which has a fixed-res LCD monitor).

On a related note, everytime my laptop comes back from suspend/hybernation, it waits a few seconds and then pops the "wireless connection unavailable" or something. No amount of unchecking "notify me" will rid me of it.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:03 PM by JamesNT

In order to stop all this abuse of the user interface in Windows, the following companies should be destroyed by thermonuclear means (listed in no particular order):

1.  Real Networks

2.  Symantec

3.  Mcafee

4.  Intuit

5.  Act!

6.  90% of all the crap at download.com

James

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:16 PM by Aaron Margosis

What's happened is that the notification area has become the UI for applications that often run in the background so that they can be accessed without taking up MORE taskbar real estate with a application button.  Examples on my computer include Process Explorer, TaskMgr, ActiveSync, MSN Messenger, Communicator, the ISA firewall client, KerbTray, volume control.  In general, I like the "quick access" nature of most of those (and the "idiot lights" feature of the network connection icons), and I could get rid of a number of them if I wanted to.  Hunting for equivalents in the Start Menu would normally be more painful, and Quick Launch can't update their tooltips or images the way notification area icons can.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:20 PM by foxyshadis

The notification area has become the "quick access" tray, for better or worse, and it's probably time to adapt to that. The problem is that the taskbar becomes too cluttered with all the framing and text junk with more than a few appliations open, even with grouping, and the start menu is simply too cluttered in general, with application links spread over dozens of vendor-specific folders. Once you've identified the icon, that's all you need to find it in the future, whether it's in the tray, taskbar, floating dock, whatever.

Media players that think it's a great idea to put controls in the tray are beyond help, though, and need a swift kick.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:21 PM by David Walker

On my Windows XP Pro SP2 system, the Update notification DOES say:

"Updates are ready for your computer.  Click here to install these updates."

I don't know why this item is in this list.  On the other hand, the Outlook icon and the Quicktime icon and the Office Language Bar spamming valuable user real-estate are certainly offenders, and they should be dealt with.

I know that Raymond doesn't work with the Office group, but it would be great if they would invite him, just once, to give a talk to their developers about just such things as these.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:24 PM by foxyshadis

Mitch, you need to get some video profiles set up, if your drivers are broken enough that they don't autodetect the second monitor and load your settings automatically. ATI and Nvidia both have that capability, no clue about Intel "extreme" graphics.

Oops, Aaron and I both said the same sort of thing. ;)

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:34 PM by Mihai

<<automatically turning on a taskbar toolbar>>

I have a good reason to want to turn on Quick Launch automatically. And that is because from time to time Win XP "forgets" that I want to show the Quick Launch and the Desktop in my task bar. So I would like to put something in autostart to make them visible.

<<adding an icon to the notification area that conveys no useful information but merely adds to the clutter>>

Just installed (yesterday) the "MS VS 2005 IDE Enhancements," and now I have an "Event Toaster" icon, no menu, no option to remove it, no info on what is that stuff supposed to do.

<<Your clock has been adjusted for daylight saving time. Do you want me to change it back?>>

Yes!!!

I have a multi-boot system, and switching between XP (my normal working partition) and 2000/Vista (used for testing) pushes me back 3 hours. Although since very early days there is a bit in the CMOS to mark if DST is in effect (byte  0x0B, RTC status register B, bit 0: daylight savings enable)

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:37 PM by Quentin

If only Microsoft would follow their own interface guidelines...

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:49 PM by n4cer

"Just installed (yesterday) the "MS VS 2005 IDE Enhancements," and now I have an "Event Toaster" icon, no menu, no option to remove it, no info on what is that stuff supposed to do."

http://blogs.msdn.com/aaronmar/archive/2006/07/19/671687.aspx

What is Event Toaster and how can I use it?

After installing the power toys, you may notice that every time you launch Visual Studio 2005, a small toaster icon appears in the system tray. This is the notification icon provided by event toaster. This power toy allows you to perform an action (e.g. playing a WAV file, showing a balloon, running a VS macro, etc…) when a given event happens in Visual Studio. The options can be configured from the standard Tools-Options dialog under Powertoys/EventToaster/General. You can also disable the event toaster from here.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:07 PM by Daev

Doesn't "actionable" mean "something we can get sued for doing"?

# Steve Wills Weblog &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; Blame the User

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:21 PM by Steve Wills Weblog » Blog Archive » Blame the User

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:26 PM by Nekto2

>> The rule for taskbar notifications is that they are there to, well, notify the user of something.

;) So how about ActiveSync, SQL server, network connection status (you could set - "always show") and even Volume control?

So there is need for some other interface area. Just rename "notification area" to "background tasks status and device status area" and introduce new "notification area" :)

And for display controls - there should be some other area where all new actions could be put to.

If there only could be feature to "Mark this item as annoying" :) Which will 1) delete this item from menu/tray etc, 2) remember that and never allows it to reappear, 3) send to MS this so they will show diagram of most annoing icons and menu items :)  Including MS one ;)

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:34 PM by bw

Raymond so why there is so much crap in Windows XP? Eg. some god damn animated animals in the search box, does windows is made for some kids?

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:36 PM by Matt Green

Lets not forget applications like Java, Realplayer, or Quicktime that think they are *so* important that a control panel needs to be installed for them, in addition to two desktop icons, a tray icon, a quick launch toolbar addition, start menu group, and an entry into the favorites menu.

Quit trying to brand my computer with your tripe.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:44 PM by Darryl

This is the best blog entry I've read in months.  Well put.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:47 PM by Ben Cooke

For ages I held on to Windows 2000, steadfast in my belief that Windows XP offered me nothing I needed that I didn't already have. A few months ago I bought a new PC and accidentally ordered Windows XP Professional with it, rather than transferring my (retail!) Windows 2000 licence to it, so I figured that I might as well give it a try since I'd paid for it.

On Windows 2000 I always used to use the old "NoDesktop" thing in the explorer "Policies" area in the registry to hide the desktop icons, since they serve no purpose for me except to give me something to delete every few months. When I first installed Windows XP, there was an item on my desktop context menu for "Show Desktop Icons", which was ticked on. I ticked it off and the icons went away. "Great!", I thought, "Microsoft added an offical way to do this!". However, a short time later I noticed that my icons had come back again and now the menu option isn't there anymore. I'm not sure what happened to it. I investigated a little, but in the end just went back to the old-fashioned policy technique instead. Occasionally I get a notification icon telling me I have unused icons on my desktop, which always makes me chuckle. But where has the official option gone? I did a survey of some of the Windows XP machines at my office and some of them have it but some of them don't. What gives?

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:51 PM by Justin Olbrantz (Quantam)

Raymond: Good post. I just hope you forwarded it to the MS company roster :P

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:51 PM by cereal

I don't mind the Intel graphics driver adding stuff to the desktop context menu - better there than the systray.  But you're right, several seconds every time to initialize is supremely annoying.  I feel your pain.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:52 PM by A

"too bad the name of the directory isn't always "Quick Launch"; the name can change based on what language the user is running."

Are you sure? The text for the context menu item is localized, but on the 3 non-English versions of Windows I have, the actual directory name is in English.

# re: Why is there no programmatic access to the Start menu pin list?

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 1:59 PM by Dan Ridley

You know, re-reading the comments from the linked three-year-old post was pretty amusing.

My favorite: 'Personally, I'm glad the Office folks abandoned the "drawing the Microsoft logo in the title bar" feature.'  

My second favorite: 'I saw the screenshots of Longhorn, it uses really cool GUI.' (Amusing because it was September 2003.)

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:00 PM by Cody

"too bad the name of the directory isn't always "Quick Launch"; the name can change based on what language the user is running."

Is there a way we can choose the directory name such that programs can't "guess" it?  Then the hardcoded Quick Launch directory can be emptied or have all permissions removed as necessary?

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:02 PM by Stu Smith

Now I know I'm not the only one to be annoyed about this sort of thing, I thought I was becoming a grumpy old man. Every day I turn on my laptop, and every day I get two balloons: wired ethernet is not connected, and wireless is connected. Big suprise, that's how I use my laptop. Sigh. I wish I could turn them off, they drive me batty.

One little idea: perhaps Microsoft could write a decent installer framework, and provide something like pre-packaged, signed, installer wizard pages to use (eg "Choose program shortcuts"). If only these MS-signed pages were allowed to access certain areas during setup, and no others, we could be sure that a setup program had asked the user if they wanted something added. A step towards reduced unwanted browser add-ons etc?

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:12 PM by Alex

"There is no programmatic interface to turn on a taskbar toolbar"

Sometimes I think Microsoft is divided into separate lands. While one guy writes "don't touch user's taskbar", other guys are creating damn Windows Desktop Search's search bar which is turned on by default!

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:29 PM by Guillaume Theoret

Sadly, this post is the exact reason nearly the first thing I do after installing Windows XP is go into the registry and turn the balloons off permanently.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:41 PM by RyanBemrose

> (If it's not running, the Start menu shortcut runs it. If it is already running, the Start menu shortcut runs the program, which recognizes that it's already running and merely activates the already-running copy.)

Raymond, doesn't this very behavior cause the problems with "A single-instance program is its own denial of service" (http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2006/06/20/639479.aspx)

[Um, I never said that it was a problem. -Raymond]

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:42 PM by sergio

My contribution to the subject:

ATI Catalyst video card drivers need for a few stupid dialogs the whole &%$ NET framework and *permanently* use a lot of RAM (up to 100 MB, they run at startup und just remain in memory and stink) only to be able to show these dialogs, if and when somebody decides to see them. Hello, ATI fools, a few dialogs can be fitted in 20 kilobytes (five thousand times less than what you spend, and probably ten millon times faster), and they don't need *any* memory permanently.

# Thoughts on App Installation Annoyances

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:48 PM by UFies.org

A nice article on the MSDN Blogs The Old New Thing entitled I bet somebody got a really nice bonus...

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:59 PM by Maciej Rutkowski

>"If you haven't already, now might be a good

> time to change the settings on your other

> clocks."

>

> Better?

Other clocks? My PC has more than one clock? Where do I set them up?

The time change notification actually says that you can click the balloon to see if everything's ok after the change.

Oh, and the Media Player knows how to turn it's toolbar on, but at least it asks politely if I want to enable it when I minimize the player.

MSN Messenger's notification icon is there all the time, even when nothing's going on. Other communicators to that too, though. And none of them turn off the icon when restored.

Notification area is simply yet another Windows shell convenience abused. Nothing new.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 3:48 PM by walter t

<i>You do not use a notification icon to say "Everything is just like it was a moment ago; nothing has changed." If nothing has changed, then say nothing.

</i>

... I'm reading that and looking down at the taksbar icons that are displayed by default by Outlook and SQL Server.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 3:53 PM by Gabe

Maybe somebody from Office is reading this blog and will be able to respond with why on Earth Outlook needs to have a icon in the notification area to say that it's running. And best of all, even the Office help tells you that to turn it off, just go into "Customize Notifications" and set it to always hide that icon.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 4:02 PM by Andrew

One the subject of useless notifications, why does Microsoft OneCare insist on telling me every day that it is uptodate?

This can only be a marketing feature to keep pushing the application into the users consciousness every day so they are more likely to renew their subscription each year.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 4:19 PM by Bob

When I built my latest computer my most frustrating experiences were with the overfeatured drivers and software included with the hardware components.  1.5 GB worth of disk space eaten by DVD utilities.  The entire .net framework so my Samsung LCD monitor could show its easy adjust menus.  Several hundred MB for Nero so I could write a simple CD.  Gone, gone (along with .net), and gone.

Two years later: I use my front panel buttons on the rare occassion that I tweak my display.  I still don't own a single piece of software that requires .net.  I copy DVDs with a 400KB piece of shareware and create CDs with an 800KB piece and don't miss a single feature.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 4:56 PM by John Knoeller

I think I have that 2 second delay desktop menu 'feature'.  Could you give any advice on how to remove it?  Perhaps an article on how one figures out who the culprit is when the desktop menu takes a long time to show up?

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:01 PM by ColinA

The thing about icons in the notification area is that they have become expected to be "quick activation" buttons (as in Winamp for example), and many, many programs allow you to remove the taskbar button and put it in the system tray.  What strikes me about this is that it's much like word usage.  Sure, you didn't intend it to be used that way when it was created, but everybody does now so that's become a de facto standard usage.  I've never noticed anyone click on a shortcut expecting to activate an already-running program... it's just not what people expect.  Even if it was, I tend to expect any running program with a UI to give me visual feedback that it's running (even when hidden).  The notification icon accomplishes this.

Indeed, I as a user have come to expect that programs I leave running constantly don't clutter my taskbar but instead take up far less of that expensive real estate by residing in the notification area.

Shouldn't the goal of user interface design be to link actions with results that users expect... like activation and feedback that the program is loaded via the notification area?  If so, why would this be a bad thing? :)

Just my thruppence (inflation).

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:22 PM by J.Marsch

I certainly agree with your post, and I have to say (as some others have) that Outlook is probably one of the more annoying offenders.

(note, I'm just feeling your pain here, I know that you can't go tell the Outlook team what to do, and that it really isn't your fault/problem, and I recognize that Outlook is a really large and successful product built by a team of really hardworking and intelligent people.  But I'm going to complain anyway  ;)

Every time I get an Outlook update from MS updates, I find Outlook has forced itself back into my quicklaunch bar.  And what's more, there is _always_ an outlook icon in my task bar notification area -- I just just in case I would rather double-click it, instead of alt-tabbing or clicking on the running task -- both of which require less effort than targetting a small icon and double-clicking on it. I get a second icon in the notification area if there is actually new email in my inbox -- do I really need notification icons for one application?

Just my 2 cents.  

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:31 PM by Todd Derscheid

For John Knoeller:

-Open the Start menu, click on Run, then type regedit and click OK.

-Find the following registry key:

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Desktop.

-Find the string value MenuShowDelay, then right-click Modify and edit the value.

-The default value is 400.  The lower the number, the faster menus open.  I have had this key set to 50 on my office PC, my home PC, and work laptops for years with no ill effects I can detect.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:32 PM by Ryan

How about the McAffee task bar icon that actively tries to sell you on additional products even though you have those products, and to top it off it has an alarm (ding! ding! ding!).  Using the taskbar icons to promote, ughghghg. I am sure someone got a nice bonus for that.  Worst is its on my tv computer and at 3am I hear DING DING DING.  Yes I shoudl disable it but its there to remind me NOT to resubscribe to McAffee, ever.. again...

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:36 PM by Doug

Daylight savings time balloon:

The action is "double-check to make sure the computer did the right thing."  Though that might be redundant for 99% of the world (the computer knows my time zone rules better than I do).

For me, at least, it is useful.  It tells me that Windows has adjusted the Real Time Clock on my computer, and reminds me that if this is not the first time this has happened on this computer (I triple-boot), I'll probably need to change it back.  (Why can't Windows just use UTC so it doesn't have to mess with my RTC?  Grr...  Backwards compatibility strikes again!)

Virtual memory size increased:

The action could be "make sure all of your programs recovered correctly" and "maybe increase your swap file size or close some programs".  But you're right, this isn't clear.

Updates are ready to install:

Click here to install them.

On the other hand, I don't care that a Wireless Network has been detected.  Duh, I just came home.  Of course Wireless networks are detected.

I think the result of all of this is obvious:

Not everybody is the same.  So the notifications MUST be configurable.

The one that annoys me the most?  "No Wireless Networks were detected."  Duh.  I just turned off my WiFi adapter.  What did you expect?  Maybe I should turn it back on to make my WiFi adapter feel loved?

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:55 PM by Maxime Haineault

What a word of truth..

And it's getting so much worst with time, it's exponential.

I've received a brand new dell laptop after a quick configuration windows was running with around 50 most useless softwares pre-installed by dell .. and about 15 shows up in the tray, that's ridiculous.

I had things like Microsoft SQL Service Management in my tray .. I mean, what in hell I'm suppose to do with that ? What it have so important which require me to support the vision of its ugly icon 10 hours a day, and worst, giving it even a fraction of my system resources ?

But the best of all at this is still Microsoft.

"you've just installed IE7, which is such an HUGE upgrade that you really should restart your computer now. What do you want to do ?"

later ..

"you have clicked later, however it is strongly recommended that you restart now ... blah blah blah"

still later, I'll take the "risk"

"seems you are a complete moron and don't want to restart now. But don't worry, a clever Microsoft employee just got a promotion by creating a system wich will bug you every 2 minutes to restart your system. Now let's see who will win!"

f*ck y** !

Hell. Take 2 identical PC and start an update race between Firefox 1.5 to 2 and IE6 to 7. I swear you'll never want to use a microsoft product again. It's like it has been made to take the maximum imaginable amount of time to install.. Maybe some IT departments likes that it take so long ? :P

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:55 PM by Bert Ealzey

Balloons are annoying and intrusive period. Off with them and make the world a better computing place.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:10 PM by Dean Harding

The Outlook icon is good because it lets you "minimize to tray." In fact, that's what most of the tray icons I have set to "visible" are. There's Outlook, Process Explorer, the CruiseControl.NET monitor thingy.

I guess there is a point here, though. Outlook could have an option to hide itself completely (except when I've got a new unread message) and only pops up again when something happens - or I click the "Outlook" icon in the Start menu if I want to write a new mail myself.

> "I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature."

I say the same thing when I read about anything to do with DRM. Sorry, I couldn't resist :)

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:13 PM by John Knoeller

To Todd Derscheid, thank you, but that's not the delay that Raymond was referring to and I was asking how to disable.

Basically, someone has installed a desktop menu extension that takes a LONG time (2 seconds or so) to do _something_ everytime I right-click on an item in the Windows Explorer.  I have no idea which product did this, nor do I know what they are doing when they take up 100% of the CPU, and I would like to know how one would figure it out.  Once I know I may decide to remove it, or I might decide that whatever it does is useful enought to keep.  (unlikely, but I could happen).

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:14 PM by Igor

>The Quick Launch bar and Favorites menu belong to the user.

AMEN! Couldn't agree more. I would just add that the HDD also belongs to us. And the Desktop. And the Start Menu. And... well you get the point.

>...change some obscure feature of their video card.

Well, there is a problem. Vista moves already not so easily accessible display properties to more obscure place in the control panel. So now they will have a valid reason to add the context menu item although there is no excuse for the delay.

>Many people use the notification area to provide quick access to a running program, which runs counter to the guidance above.

This is where I disagree with you Raymond. Having quick access to a running program is good thing. You can right click on a program icon and tell it to check for email or to download a file for you. You can't right click in Start Menu to accomplish the same thing. Also, navigating through the Start Menu is harder especially if it is cluttered.

>Doesn't matter whether the program is running already or not.

Well it wouldn't mind if the program had the ability change the icon context menu or the default action for the click and double-click on its icon while running. That would be an UI improvement. For example, Outlook icon could launch Outlook if it is not running, but clicking on it while it is running could bring it up and you could get access to its features from the changed context menu.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:20 PM by Dean Harding

Oh, and as for having a "non-Quick Launch-Quick Launch" bar, if you right-click on your taskbar, then Toolbars, and New Toolbar... you can point a toolbar at any folder you like. Just copy a couple of shortcuts in there and you've got a Quick Launch bar that nobody can touch! They can install whatever they like in the "real" Quick Launch folder, but you've got it hidden. Cool!

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:24 PM by Bob

I really hate that wireless network in range because if you're on the fringe of the network it will keep popping up.

# Automatic Update balloons

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:29 PM by Revenant

Maxime Haineault: "seems you are a complete moron and don't want to restart now. But don't worry, a clever Microsoft employee just got a promotion by creating a system wich will bug you every 2 minutes to restart your system. Now let's see who will win!"

I use a low-tech method which I'm sure is not recommended:

Start | Run | net stop wuauserv

This stops the Automatic Updates service, which means it can't pop up bloody annoying balloons. Yes, I know I'm running in a Frankenstate, and I won't get extra updates while it's stopped, but honestly, I have almost never had a problem because of it.

About the only times I restart these days are when I need to install new hardware or when I get sick of multiple programs nagging me.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:34 PM by Novous

Oh yeah, that's great and all. But where was this sound advice back when Windows XP--the archaic operating system written years upon years ago--was still in beta?

I congratulate you on finding another niche to complain about in XP.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:36 PM by Igor

@John Knoeller:

It is most likely nVidia desktop context menu extension.

1. Right-click on desktop, then Properties.

2. Settings Tab, Advanced button

3. Tab with the nVidia icon and the name of your card

4. In the tree on the left click on Tools

5. Uncheck Enable desktop context menu

However, I would like to ask Raymond why "New" context menu takes so much time? I find that annoying as well as the delay you get by mousing over View|Toolbars and View|Explorer Bar in Internet Explorer 6.

# Bug in XP x64?

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:39 PM by Igor

If you uncheck both "Show icon in notification area when connected" and "Notify me when this connection has limited or no connectivity" for a network connection, you still get annoying "The cable is unplugged" baloon. How come?

# NOT EVERYBODY SPEAKS ENGLISH

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 7:12 PM by max

Americans tend to think that EVERYBODY speaks english. If that would be true, why do you think Windows and google and msn and Photoshop are edited in plenty other languages.

I work for an american company in Mexico and use the language tools a lot since english keyboard does not have special carachters as é á ü etc.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:07 PM by bcdef

The OSX application Growl, a notification manager that allows you to customize which events you want to see pop up, as well as how they look, presents a way for third-party developers to plug into the notification system without being abusive. This is currently a key void in the Windows operating system IMHO.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:09 PM by bcdef

FWIW, a Windows alternative: http://www.fullphat.net/

(doesn't stop the abusers of the system level notification system though, I believe)

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:26 PM by steveg

It's the twats in Marketing that get the bonuses, not the geeks. "We need our [Quicktime|MSN|WMP|Intel|Nvidia|ATI|Office|.*] logo on the screen. It's IMPORTANT! **** usability, I don't even know what that is."

Personally I hope whoever decided the Office 2007's File Menu should be the Office Logo menu almost chokes to death on a ham (or lettuce if they're vegetarian or don't eat pork) sandwich. How did they "solve" this? They renamed the feature from File menu to Office menu. Morons.

It'll get worse when Your Favourite App imitates the Office 2007 interface and has their crappy logo for the file menu.

Morons.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:43 PM by DriverDude

steveg is right, it's usually some marketeer who decides their software is just SO GREAT that everyone will want it to always run ALL THE TIME (no Startup shortcut), that it is PERFECT so there is no reason to disable it (no Startup shortcut), and will be the only program running (plenty of RAM for .NET), and is so IMPORTANT that shortcuts must be placed EVERYWHERE - desktop, start menu...

Can you tell I'm pissed...

The worst is they provide no remedy when something goes wrong. (Hello, Creative...?!?)

Just for fun, compare the UI for Nvidia's gaming 3D video cards versus their business Quattro cards. The gaming cards have a pretty settings UI and they tell you, in no uncertain terms, that that pretty UI is so great and will be the only one available in the future.

Their business video cards use the older style dialogs, without the fancy UI and eye candy. The business UI is faster and all the settings are easily accessible.

Matrox does the same thing, a pretty UI for consumers uses .NET 2.0, and a standard UI for "server" users. It's all about image.

I would love to hit them over the head with this clue-by-4s. Thanks, Raymond.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:57 PM by Ulric

Well, it may have been called the 'notification area' in the spec, it's now the de facto area for programs that are always running in the background.  Like MSN, skype, the volume control, rss newsreader, etc.  Applets or services as oposed to the application task bar.  It naturally leads to a widget bar..

Personnally, I haven't been fighting them or the quicklaunch..  context menus on the shell are deadly to performance, though.  I think they are what cause people to re-install windows, they are what makes it feel sluggish.  Nothing worse than a context menu timing out of a network license check or update check.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:22 PM by WindowsUser

Can't say that I agree with the poster.  I actually find certain bubbles like "Your clock has been adjusted for daylight saving time" very helpful.  Just last weekend it reminded me that we're back in winter time.  In fact, I believe this kind of "notification" bubbles is what the system tray was made for in the first place.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:09 PM by Archangel

As usual, you're right in so many ways.

One of my favourites was a system tray icon supplied with Intel's graphics drivers that allowed users to change their screen resolution etc, similar to those desktop context menus. When I met this beast (several years ago now) it was on a co-worker's machine. As it turned out, they hadn't bother to implement the nicer features of the proper dialog, such as only showing displayable resolutions and the 15 second restore thing.

The user in question seemed to think his 17" CRT might be capable of 1920x1200, so chose that from the list. Predictably, it wasn't, but it didn't restore itself - he ended up raising a call with tech support and going home.

Incidentally Raymond, laptop users do occasionally want to change their screen resolution - if you've got a high-resolution or widescreen (or both) laptop, projectors often refuse to play nicely with it. I agree entirely that it's _not_ something you want on a "convenient" context menu though!

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:21 PM by LarryOsterman

Aaron, it's a nit, but the volume icon (like the clock and a couple of other built-in icons) is actually built into the shell, it doesn't take up a process (although if you click on it, sndvol32.exe is launched).

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 12:38 AM by Paul Coddington

"My biggest peeve is Symantec's moronic Anti-virus notification balloon."

Hmm - I hadn't noticed that one.  I was probably too frustrated at the time by the background automatic virus signature update progress meter dialog popping up in my face (system modal of course - the old "please stop work for 10 minutes while I do an automatic background update" trick).

Symantec are now regarded as a thing of the past, for me.  A distant memory of more naive and paranoid days.

# My Bag of Beans &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 2:43 AM by David

What about that damn balloon that Outlook pops up when it has some sort of minor connection slowdown ? "Outlook is sending or recieving data from the Exchange server" or somesuch.

Gods!

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 5:14 AM by JamesW

I pretty much agree with everything that has been said here. Especially the desktop icons balloon. That bottom right corner (assuming a standard taskbar position) is just a chaotic mess. Balloons, toasters, icons for crap I don't care about, all jostling for space and attention. After a reboot I have spend time killing them all. :(

Another annoyance is the lack of standards for systray^Wnotification area icons. Do I click on it or right click to get something to happen? Will it raise an app, or some pop-up menu? Who knows!

Quicktime has always puzzled me, it's not as if they're trying to replicate something from OS X. If it was about advertising, why not stick iTunes there too? Perhaps they are intentionally making Windows that bit more annoying. If so, then the broken Microsoft mouse control panel on OS X is probably pay-back.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 5:58 AM by Gary Williams

I hate ballons.

"A wireless network is in range" so what? I work in a large city where there are loads of the damn things and I DON'T want to connect to them all.

"Print Job complete". I know.I hit Print didn't I? If there is a problem the printer will tell windows and windows will tell me.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 6:54 AM by Nekto2

> Take 2 identical PC and start an update race between Firefox 1.5 to 2 and IE6 to 7.

But IE is not just a web browser such as FF :) IE is half of OS ;)) Many software depends on it's components.

> There is intentionally no interface to manipulate shortcuts in the Quick Launch bar.

Don't you think that it would be better to implement such an interface _and_ make a special user control interface so he will select to show only those he actually need and hide (not delete) others? :)

> ..and learned our lesson...

so the lesson #2 is that it will be abused either way :) Better to implement anti-abuse. AFAIK same thing as to allow overwriting DLL in system32 and then replace it with corect one several seconds later.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:24 AM by Michiel

The System Tray is quite a good bit of UI. It can shrink on the taskbar, it can autohide together with the rest of the toolbar, users can find it and they do understand it. Now, if Microsoft would just take the Excel route and acknowledge this use, everyone would be happy.

What is still needed? Let's put the user in control. That is to say: automatically add an 'exit' option if it is missing from the context menu. This is a hard kill, no vetos. Add a 'hide' option which will hide the icon. Perhaps for the worst offenders, add a 'Remove this program'. That will add an incentive to keep your stuff out of the System Tray. And since it's the Shell group, not the Office group, they can make Office play by these rules as well.

The tricky bit: figuring out the offender. This is not very hard, if you reverse the logic. Only allow programs with an 'Add/Remove Programs' entry to appear at all.

[Replacing one unsolved problem with a different unsolved problem. -Raymond]

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:27 AM by Alex

best rant in a long long time!!!!

awesome article.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:35 AM by Rachael

John Knoeller, I have exactly the same problem with the right-click context menu taking ages to load (except it's more like 10 seconds than 2).

I would be very grateful if Raymond did an article on how to fix it.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:53 AM by Dean Harding

> how to fix it

Uninstall the program that is installing the menu items.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 8:14 AM by required

"Your print job is complete. Go pick it up."

Heh. In the Good Old Days we used to get them delivered to us. Mind, that was 20 years ago.

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 8:53 AM by Ian Boyd

Using Outlook as the example.

i want Outlook running most of the time, so that it can notify me of an Email. i don't want it on the task bar. It's not *supposed* to be in the notification area. And i want a way to see that it is running.

Now invent the user interface.

[It goes in the taskbar. That's what the taskbar is for. What you're asking for goes against the design of the shell. Maybe you'd be better off with some other operating system. -Raymond]

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:56 AM by Tim Smith

It might go against the design of the shell, but from a user's perspective having outlook not in the task bar can be a good thing.

I have a quote from you, Raymond, that states that if a user doesn't use a feature the way it was intended then you should either educate or change the design.  [paraphrased]  I think that quote is valid here.  

Also, there are always going to be edge conditions where what is best for the user goes against what the software design intended.

[Everything is a balance. Do you add every feature that even one person asks for? Even if it harms others? -Raymond]

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:24 AM by required

Actually I think Ian is right. What I want to see in the taskbar are those programs I am working with - VS, IE, and so on. Everything else is a distraction when I switch from one to another. Having (for example) a mail client notify you from the notification area is, IMO, a better way. Maybe though Outlook should be split into two - something that fetches the email and notifies you, and then you can choose to start Outlook or not. Umm. A bit like fetchmail and mutt. <runs away>

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:26 AM by JamesNT

When are you people going to learn to NOT go up against someone who is:

a.  Smarter than you

b.  Has access to billion dollar research documents on what does and does not work regarding human to computer interfacing.

c.  Carried out half that research himself.

James

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:53 AM by Ulric

I find the 'new mail' icon stressful and it deconcentrates me, but contrarily to what *I think* is implied here, it's a fault in Outlook to not allow me to turn that notification area icon off.  As oposed to a fault in the concept.

I went back to outlook 2000 after trying 2003.. My O2003 teammates do get that network balloon help, even though we don't have a bad network configuration.  That really seems to be unnecessary and distracting!  

The default mail notice which shows a message preview, as well.. I don't know what they're thinking, it's like the Outlook Team thinks everyone's priority should be email.  It's not.  People would call if it needed to be addressed immediately

# re: I bet somebody got a really nice bonus for that feature

Thursday, November 02, 2006 11:30 AM by