<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why is a registry file called a "hive"?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2003/08/08/54618.aspx</link><description>Useless trivia day. Why is a registry file called a "hive"? Because one of the original developers of Windows NT hated bees.&amp;#160; So the developer who was responsible for the registry snuck in as many bee references as he could.&amp;#160; A registry file</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>RE: Why is a registry file called a "hive"?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2003/08/08/54618.aspx#54619</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2003 01:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:54619</guid><dc:creator>MartinJ</dc:creator><description>I guess a bad pun would be to talk about honeypots...</description></item><item><title>RE: Why is a registry file called a "hive"?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2003/08/08/54618.aspx#54620</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2003 02:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:54620</guid><dc:creator>Brian Randell</dc:creator><description>Hmm, I thought it had to do with that fact that the data was structured using B-trees?</description></item><item><title>RE: Why is a registry file called a "hive"?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2003/08/08/54618.aspx#54621</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2003 21:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:54621</guid><dc:creator>BrianJ</dc:creator><description>So, do you know the deal with MZ of MZ header fame?  Is that really someone's initials?  If so, whatever became of the real MZ?</description></item><item><title>RE: Why is a registry file called a "hive"?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2003/08/08/54618.aspx#54622</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2003 08:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:54622</guid><dc:creator>Raymond Chen</dc:creator><description>MZ is indeed Mark Zbikowski.  He still works at Microsoft and is one of the nicest guys it's been my pleasure to have met.</description></item><item><title>RE: Why is a registry file called a "hive"?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2003/08/08/54618.aspx#54623</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:54623</guid><dc:creator>Thomas Lee</dc:creator><description>And here I thought the analogy was meant to refer to the notion that if you mess around (with the registry) and do not know what you are doing - you will get stung (or additional practice in reinstallation).</description></item><item><title>re: Why is a registry file called a "hive"?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2003/08/08/54618.aspx#153249</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 04:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:153249</guid><dc:creator>Larry Osterman</dc:creator><description>Ok, so I'm coming to this 8 months late :)  Mark actually interviewed me, it was absolutely the most pleasant of my on-campus interviews :).&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why is a registry file called a "hive"?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2003/08/08/54618.aspx#160205</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:160205</guid><dc:creator>Raymond Chen</dc:creator><description>Commenting on this article has been closed.</description></item><item><title>Beware of non-null-terminated registry strings</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2003/08/08/54618.aspx#219445</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:219445</guid><dc:creator>The Old New Thing</dc:creator><description>An edge case that can result in a buffer overrun.</description></item><item><title>How did registry keys work in 16-bit Windows?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2003/08/08/54618.aspx#7142334</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:11:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7142334</guid><dc:creator>The Old New Thing</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It didn't do quite as much back then.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>