<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway? (aka Part 2 of the Yardstick saga)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx</link><description>Way back in 2002 when we started working on Whidbey, I captured my thoughts on the direction we should take for C# and Visual Studio in two large emails. In the first email The Yardstick I spent a lot of time saying that you must evaluate features against</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway? (aka Part 2 of the Yardstick saga)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#509316</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 22:35:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:509316</guid><dc:creator>Justin Etheredge</dc:creator><description>Well, I think that visualizers in Visual Studio 2005 is a decent step in the direction of better understanding code. It will allow you to walk through a piece of executing code and better understand what is going on in the objects that you are working with (provided you take the time to implement this on your objects). I think that one feature that visual studio has been sorely lacking for years is source outlining. Just being able to have the source formatted for you isn't enough. Products such as code rush provide a good example of how this could be implemented. Simply having colored lines or other visual cues that let you match up loops, methods, or other structures would help a lot in allowing you to glance at a piece of code and decipher its structure. Another feature that would also be interesting would be to allow a developer to hover over a method call, and if it is small enough, display this new method in a tool tip or something. This way, when I am going through a method and it calls out to another method, I can get a quick view of what the other method looks like without having to switch source files. This could also work excellently during debugging when I need to decide whether or not I need to step into a method. On larger methods, just being able to see the first 10 lines or so would be greatly useful.</description></item><item><title>re: What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway? (aka Part 2 of the Yardstick saga)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#509318</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 22:35:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:509318</guid><dc:creator>Justin Etheredge</dc:creator><description>Well, I think that visualizers in Visual Studio 2005 is a decent step in the direction of better understanding code. It will allow you to walk through a piece of executing code and better understand what is going on in the objects that you are working with (provided you take the time to implement this on your objects). I think that one feature that visual studio has been sorely lacking for years is source outlining. Just being able to have the source formatted for you isn't enough. Products such as code rush provide a good example of how this could be implemented. Simply having colored lines or other visual cues that let you match up loops, methods, or other structures would help a lot in allowing you to glance at a piece of code and decipher its structure. Another feature that would also be interesting would be to allow a developer to hover over a method call, and if it is small enough, display this new method in a tool tip or something. This way, when I am going through a method and it calls out to another method, I can get a quick view of what the other method looks like without having to switch source files. This could also work excellently during debugging when I need to decide whether or not I need to step into a method. On larger methods, just being able to see the first 10 lines or so would be greatly useful.</description></item><item><title>Writing Code Isn't Rocket Science (It's Worse Than That)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#572587</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:26:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:572587</guid><dc:creator>Fabulous Adventures In Coding</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Today, an old joke:&lt;br&gt;Q: What do rocket scientists say when they want to describe a portion of their...</description></item><item><title>re: I Hate Mort (sort of)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#584702</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 05:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:584702</guid><dc:creator>Panopticon Central</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>XCode ist nur etwas f&amp;#252;r Raketen-Bauer</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#585515</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:44:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:585515</guid><dc:creator>Both Sides of the Schwartz</dc:creator><description>Last Post today: Three good reads!&lt;br&gt;1) Peter Hallam from Microsoft, pointing out the important thing of a good IDE. He starts with the experience that developers spend 2-5% of their time in writing new Code, 20-25% in modifying existing Code and the rest</description></item><item><title>And now for something completly different</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#585518</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:44:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:585518</guid><dc:creator>Both Sides of the Schwartz</dc:creator><description>Last Post today: Three good reads!&lt;br&gt;1) Peter Hallam from Microsoft, pointing out the important thing of a good IDE. He starts with the experience that developers spend 2-5% of their time in writing new Code, 20-25% in modifying existing Code and the rest</description></item><item><title>Labnotes  &amp;raquo; Rounded Corners - 28</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#765178</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:08:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:765178</guid><dc:creator>Labnotes  » Rounded Corners - 28</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/09/21/rounded-corners-28-2/"&gt;http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/09/21/rounded-corners-28-2/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>&amp;amp;#191;Qu&amp;amp;#233; hacen realmente los programadores profesionales con su tiempo?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#768763</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:37:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:768763</guid><dc:creator>PERCY REYES'S BLOG -&gt; in-kernel Mode</dc:creator><description>Una excelente pregunta que fue tratada aqu&amp;amp;#237; por Peter Hallam, donde se&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;analiza el tiempo asignado...</description></item><item><title>Apa yang Menghabiskan Waktu Seorang Programmer &amp;laquo; easyblog - Idiotnesia</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#813399</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:34:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:813399</guid><dc:creator>Apa yang Menghabiskan Waktu Seorang Programmer « easyblog - Idiotnesia</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://easyblog.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/apa-yang-menghabiskan-waktu-seorang-programmer/"&gt;http://easyblog.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/apa-yang-menghabiskan-waktu-seorang-programmer/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>  Apa yang Menghabiskan Waktu Seorang Programmer at  ::Noe Noe 21::</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#1081807</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:59:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1081807</guid><dc:creator>  Apa yang Menghabiskan Waktu Seorang Programmer at  ::Noe Noe 21::</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://noe-noe.idcomm.net/?p=10"&gt;http://noe-noe.idcomm.net/?p=10&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Die beste Nachricht des Tages...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#1084733</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:42:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1084733</guid><dc:creator>Both Sides of the Schwartz</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;wird neben mir wohl mal wieder kein Schwein interessieren, aber f&amp;#252;r mich &amp;#252;bertrifft es sogar Zubis Patzer:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;XCode kriegt Refactoring-M&amp;#246;glichkeiten !!! Endlich. Ich habe mich immer gefragt, weshalb Apple da nicht mehr Zeit drauf verwendet. 1. Zwischen&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>¿Qué hacen realmente los desarrolladores profesionales con su tiempo?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#1293647</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:58:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1293647</guid><dc:creator>PERCY REYES en Geek.ms -&gt; Evolucionando™ </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Una excelente pregunta que fue tratada aqu&amp;#237; por Peter Hallam, donde se analiza el tiempo asignado a ciertas&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Porque debo reescribir codigo?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#1300868</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 06:08:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1300868</guid><dc:creator>miguel jimenez en español // MVP C#</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Estaba leyendo un post de Perci Reyes , inspirado en un post sobre como comprender el c&amp;#243;digo en Coding&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Porque debo reescribir codigo?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#1327088</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:30:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1327088</guid><dc:creator>Bloggers MSDN Latam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Estaba leyendo un post de Perci Reyes , inspirado en un post sobre como comprender el c&amp;#243;digo en Coding&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Software Integrity  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Top five reasons not to use static analysis</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#3547064</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:08:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3547064</guid><dc:creator>Software Integrity  » Blog Archive   » Top five reasons not to use static analysis</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://softwareintegrityblog.com/blog/2007/06/26/top-five-reasons-not-to-use-static-analysis"&gt;http://softwareintegrityblog.com/blog/2007/06/26/top-five-reasons-not-to-use-static-analysis&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Software Integrity  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; An easy win for code quality</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#4866568</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:53:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4866568</guid><dc:creator>Software Integrity  » Blog Archive   » An easy win for code quality</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://softwareintegrityblog.com/blog/2007/09/11/an-easy-win-for-code-quality"&gt;http://softwareintegrityblog.com/blog/2007/09/11/an-easy-win-for-code-quality&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Professional Visual Studio &amp;raquo; Beyond Courier New</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#5336957</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 12:03:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5336957</guid><dc:creator>Professional Visual Studio » Beyond Courier New</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.professionalvisualstudio.com/blog/2007/10/07/beyond-courier-new/"&gt;http://www.professionalvisualstudio.com/blog/2007/10/07/beyond-courier-new/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Euphemos  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; New vs. Existing Code</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#8326212</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:31:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8326212</guid><dc:creator>Euphemos  » Blog Archive   » New vs. Existing Code</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.euphemos.com/2006/04/19/new-vs-existing-code/"&gt;http://blog.euphemos.com/2006/04/19/new-vs-existing-code/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Peter Hallam's WebLog : What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway? (aka Part 2 of the Yardstick saga)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#8577444</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:31:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8577444</guid><dc:creator>Weddings</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Way back in 2002 when we started working on Whidbey, I captured my thoughts on the direction we should take for C# and Visual Studio in two large emails. In the first email The Yardstick I spent a lot of time saying that you must evaluate features agains&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>#region. Sliced bread or sliced worms?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#8718971</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:36:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8718971</guid><dc:creator>Eric Gunnerson's C# Compendium</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;(editors note: Eric gave me several different options to use instead of sliced worms, but they were all&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>#region. Sliced bread or sliced worms?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#8719562</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 04:47:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8719562</guid><dc:creator>Readed By Wrocław NUG members</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;(editors note: Eric gave me several different options to use instead of sliced worms, but they were all&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>
		Making it easy on Jay Paroline - Grooveshark Dev	</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#8871426</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8871426</guid><dc:creator>
		Making it easy on Jay Paroline - Grooveshark Dev	</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://wanderr.com/jay/making-it-easy/2008/08/16/"&gt;http://wanderr.com/jay/making-it-easy/2008/08/16/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Programmers: far more than typists &amp;laquo; Peet Brits</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#9144748</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:57:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9144748</guid><dc:creator>Programmers: far more than typists &amp;laquo; Peet Brits</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://peetbrits.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/programmers-far-more-than-typists/"&gt;http://peetbrits.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/programmers-far-more-than-typists/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> &amp;#171; An Experiment in Scotch</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#9178149</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:40:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9178149</guid><dc:creator> &amp;#171; An Experiment in Scotch</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.anexperimentinscotch.com/?p=642"&gt;http://www.anexperimentinscotch.com/?p=642&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Peter Hallam s WebLog What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway aka Part | Paid Surveys</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#9654410</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:38:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9654410</guid><dc:creator> Peter Hallam s WebLog What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway aka Part | Paid Surveys</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=peter-hallam-s-weblog-what-do-programmers-really-do-anyway-aka-part"&gt;http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=peter-hallam-s-weblog-what-do-programmers-really-do-anyway-aka-part&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Team Rooms Aren&amp;#8217;t That Agile &amp;laquo; Mental Pandiculation</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#9701311</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:36:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9701311</guid><dc:creator>Team Rooms Aren&amp;#8217;t That Agile &amp;laquo; Mental Pandiculation</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://mentalpandiculation.com/?p=109"&gt;http://mentalpandiculation.com/?p=109&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Peter Hallam s WebLog What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway aka Part | Insomnia Cure</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#9719652</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:43:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9719652</guid><dc:creator> Peter Hallam s WebLog What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway aka Part | Insomnia Cure</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://insomniacuresite.info/story.php?id=6766"&gt;http://insomniacuresite.info/story.php?id=6766&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Peter Hallam s WebLog What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway aka Part | debt settlement program</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#9753950</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:08:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9753950</guid><dc:creator> Peter Hallam s WebLog What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway aka Part | debt settlement program</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://edebtsettlementprogram.info/story.php?id=24026"&gt;http://edebtsettlementprogram.info/story.php?id=24026&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Peter Hallam s WebLog What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway aka Part | unemployment office</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#9759970</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:14:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9759970</guid><dc:creator> Peter Hallam s WebLog What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway aka Part | unemployment office</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://unemploymentofficeresource.info/story.php?id=1094"&gt;http://unemploymentofficeresource.info/story.php?id=1094&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Peter Hallam s WebLog What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway aka Part | alternative dating</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/peterhal/archive/2006/01/04/509302.aspx#9768272</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:47:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9768272</guid><dc:creator> Peter Hallam s WebLog What Do Programmers Really Do Anyway aka Part | alternative dating</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://topalternativedating.info/story.php?id=1231"&gt;http://topalternativedating.info/story.php?id=1231&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>