<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Custom Loop with Arbitrary Initialization, Condition, and Update</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/07/27/8780159.aspx</link><description>The Parallel.For loop construct provided by Parallel Extensions is focused on providing a parallel alternative to the common sequential pattern of a for loop that iterates over a range of numbers.&amp;#160; However, the for loop construct in a language like</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Custom Loop with Arbitrary Initialization, Condition, and Update</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/07/27/8780159.aspx#8788971</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:41:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8788971</guid><dc:creator>Pointernil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; i just remembered what i was missing lately using parallel.for:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;how about an override which allows for LONG indexes instead of INT. Yes, the current workaround is to use a cast, but that's ... ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Custom Loop with Arbitrary Initialization, Condition, and Update</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/07/27/8780159.aspx#8789616</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:35:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8789616</guid><dc:creator>toub</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pointernil, thanks for the request. &amp;nbsp;Support for In64 in Parallel.For is certainly something we're considering. &amp;nbsp;What are you doing that you need Int64s? &amp;nbsp;Is it that you are already using Int64 values but in the range of Int32 and are just trying to avoid a cast, or are you actually outside the bounds of what an Int32 can support?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Custom Loop with Arbitrary Initialization, Condition, and Update</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/07/27/8780159.aspx#8790955</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:45:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8790955</guid><dc:creator>Pointernil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@toub: 1) my index being typed with Long sneaked in by using FileStream.Seek method with large, sorry hudge files; this one takes a &amp;quot;long Offset&amp;quot; param;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) PFX rocks! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) Please have a serious talk with Anders or Mr.Erik Meijers ;) and have them wrap the lib with some syntactic sugar in the compilers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) When are you guys going to announce that OS level interface to co-processing units and the PFX support for that? ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Custom Loop with Arbitrary Initialization, Condition, and Update</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/07/27/8780159.aspx#8803487</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 04:26:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8803487</guid><dc:creator>toub</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pointernil, thanks for the feedback, and I'm very glad you find Parallel Extensions useful. &amp;nbsp;We're definitely considering Int64 support; others have suggested it's important, too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for Anders and Erik, we talk with them all the time :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>.Net Parallel Extensions</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/07/27/8780159.aspx#8844921</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:03:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8844921</guid><dc:creator>ZenPyrical</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am very much looking forward to the new .Net Parallel extensions being RTM&amp;amp;#39;d. This Post from Stephen&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>