<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Parallel Programming and the .NET Framework 4.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx</link><description>Last week, the VP of the Developer Division at Microsoft announced the next version of Visual Studio and the .NET Framework: Visual Studio 2010 and the .NET Framework 4.0.&amp;#160; In line with that, the folks at Channel 9 have been posting videos left and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>infoblog &amp;raquo; Parallel Programming and the .NET Framework 4.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#8994946</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:56:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8994946</guid><dc:creator>infoblog &amp;raquo; Parallel Programming and the .NET Framework 4.0</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.a-foton.ru/index.php/2008/10/11/parallel-programming-and-the-net-framework-40/"&gt;http://blog.a-foton.ru/index.php/2008/10/11/parallel-programming-and-the-net-framework-40/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>C#4, .NET 4 and concurrency &amp;laquo; Yet Another [a compl??ter]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#8995947</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:49:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8995947</guid><dc:creator>C#4, .NET 4 and concurrency &amp;laquo; Yet Another [a compl??ter]</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://garuma.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/c4-net-4-and-concurrency/"&gt;http://garuma.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/c4-net-4-and-concurrency/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Parallel Programming and the .NET Framework 4.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#8996289</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:59:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8996289</guid><dc:creator>PingForward</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does this mean this will be THE distribution vehicle for this or will it be out of band prior to that?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Parallel Programming and the .NET Framework 4.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#8996329</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:12:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8996329</guid><dc:creator>toub</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There may in fact be other distribution vehicles, but this is the primary one that we've announced.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Parallel Extensions are part of the .NET Framework</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#8996357</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:04:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8996357</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Moth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Parallel Extensions are part of the .NET Framework 4.0&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Parallel Programming and the .NET Framework 4.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#8996461</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 04:41:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8996461</guid><dc:creator>David</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Woo. :) Can we expect the Silverlight/CoreCLR story to evolve similarly?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock  &amp;raquo; The Morning Brew #199</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#8997662</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:13:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8997662</guid><dc:creator>Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock  &amp;raquo; The Morning Brew #199</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.cwa.me.uk/2008/10/13/the-morning-brew-199/"&gt;http://blog.cwa.me.uk/2008/10/13/the-morning-brew-199/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Parallel Computing and .NET Framework 4.0 for Windows</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#8999254</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:46:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8999254</guid><dc:creator>Parallel Computing and .NET Framework 4.0 for Windows</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.ditii.com/2008/10/14/parallel-computing-and-net-framework-40-for-windows/"&gt;http://www.ditii.com/2008/10/14/parallel-computing-and-net-framework-40-for-windows/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Parallel Programming and the .NET Framework 4.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#8999518</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:09:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8999518</guid><dc:creator>Jon Skeet</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Many congratulations!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It's great to know that we'll be able to rely on it being available wherever 4.0 is running :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>   Parallel Programming and the .NET Framework 4.0 | insideHPC.com </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#9000785</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:30:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9000785</guid><dc:creator>   Parallel Programming and the .NET Framework 4.0 | insideHPC.com </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://insidehpc.com/2008/10/15/parallel-programming-and-the-net-framework-40/"&gt;http://insidehpc.com/2008/10/15/parallel-programming-and-the-net-framework-40/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Parallel Programming and the .NET Framework 4.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#9001169</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:58:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9001169</guid><dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So does this mean we'll have to wait for 4.0 to get our hands on PFX? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm already running some of my home software with PFX and can't wait to push it out to when the release bins come out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Put the bins out a bit earlier... that way you'll have some time for performance feedback before 4.0!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Parallel Extensions for .Net Framework will be included in .Net 4.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#9001554</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:44:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9001554</guid><dc:creator>Frank Bakker</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I has been a while since I wrote a post on parallel programming. Since that time a lot has happend in&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>  Parallel Extensions halten Einzug in .NET 4.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#9016621</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:38:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9016621</guid><dc:creator>  Parallel Extensions halten Einzug in .NET 4.0</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.leading-edge-dev.de/?p=10"&gt;http://www.leading-edge-dev.de/?p=10&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>valerio.net  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4.0 are out!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#9019074</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:06:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9019074</guid><dc:creator>valerio.net  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4.0 are out!</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://thevalerios.net/matt/2008/10/visual-studio-2010-and-net-framework-40-are-out/"&gt;http://thevalerios.net/matt/2008/10/visual-studio-2010-and-net-framework-40-are-out/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Parallel Programming and the .NET Framework 4.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#9023893</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:38:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9023893</guid><dc:creator>almostchristian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Will they add any syntactic sugar for parallelism in any of the .NET languages just like what they did for LINQ? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would rather be using parallel_for with a syntax similar to that of for as opposed to Parallel.For which isn't nearly as readable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would increase the visibility of parallelism and also send a message that parallelism in .NET is easy to do and not some arcane feature that will only be used by advanced developers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Inicios con Parallel Extensions</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#9393023</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:41:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9393023</guid><dc:creator>.net</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Debido a la proliferaci&amp;#243;n de procesadores de n&amp;#250;cleos m&amp;#250;ltiples, los picatecla desarrolladores tenemos&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Inicios con Parallel Extensions</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#9393216</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:52:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9393216</guid><dc:creator>.net</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Debido a la proliferaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de procesadores de n&amp;amp;uacute;cleos m&amp;amp;uacute;ltiples, los picatecla desarrolladores&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>  Keeping Up With the Programmers | techencoder</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/pfxteam/archive/2008/10/10/8994927.aspx#9394564</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 07:39:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9394564</guid><dc:creator>  Keeping Up With the Programmers | techencoder</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://techencoder.com/index.php/2009/02/keeping-up/"&gt;http://techencoder.com/index.php/2009/02/keeping-up/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>