<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Emit-XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/archive/2008/10/18/emit-xml.aspx</link><description>I was writing a demo yesterday and needed a quick and dirty way to generate some XML so I wrote the function below. This highlights a couple of changes that are coming up in CTP3 that I thought I would preview. 1) The keyword "cmdlet" is going away and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Emit-XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/archive/2008/10/18/emit-xml.aspx#9004814</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:05:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9004814</guid><dc:creator>dreeschkind</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think removing the cmdlet keyword is a very good decision. It reduces complexity of the language and makes PowerShell a more consistent environment (cmdlets in the function provider?!). Are you still going to enforce verb-noun names for these &amp;quot;funclets&amp;quot;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PS: Shouldn't Emit-xml be called ConvertTo-XML or Out-XML?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;greetings&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dreeschkind&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dew Drop - October 18, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/archive/2008/10/18/emit-xml.aspx#9004873</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:59:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9004873</guid><dc:creator>Dew Drop - October 18, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.alvinashcraft.com/2008/10/18/dew-drop-october-18-2008/"&gt;http://www.alvinashcraft.com/2008/10/18/dew-drop-october-18-2008/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Emit-XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/archive/2008/10/18/emit-xml.aspx#9005282</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:32:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9005282</guid><dc:creator>Jaykul</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Haha, except ... you have to! (Wait, I mean) &amp;nbsp;At least we get to know you're impatient too ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Emit-XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/archive/2008/10/18/emit-xml.aspx#9005533</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:12:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9005533</guid><dc:creator>PowerShellTeam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Are you still going to enforce verb-noun names for these &amp;quot;funclets&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;jps&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Emit-XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/archive/2008/10/18/emit-xml.aspx#9005556</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:23:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9005556</guid><dc:creator>bobhy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hah! You've just re-invented CGI and ASP!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Emit-XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/archive/2008/10/18/emit-xml.aspx#9005890</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:31:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9005890</guid><dc:creator>PowerShellTeam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Hah! You've just re-invented CGI and ASP!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yup. &amp;nbsp;A good idea is a good idea. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a lot more scenarios for creating documents (e.g. XML) than Web applications though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;jps&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Emit-XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/archive/2008/10/18/emit-xml.aspx#9014698</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:31:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9014698</guid><dc:creator>tfl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Two questions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. When you say &amp;quot;CMDLETS go away&amp;quot;, does that mean totally?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. When do you expect to release CTP3? :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Emit-XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/archive/2008/10/18/emit-xml.aspx#9015288</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:41:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9015288</guid><dc:creator>PowerShellTeam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; 1. When you say &amp;quot;CMDLETS go away&amp;quot;, does that mean totally?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The language keyword we introduced in CTP2 will go away and be replaced with an model which just uses FUNCTION.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; 2. When do you expect to release CTP3? :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Certainly before the end of the year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;jps&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Emit-XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/archive/2008/10/18/emit-xml.aspx#9015826</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:57:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9015826</guid><dc:creator>Smith Catar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What is V2 codename? or, does V2 have codename?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because of it, i'm not possible to take a nap after i get up in this morning.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Emit-XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/archive/2008/10/18/emit-xml.aspx#9016083</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:45:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9016083</guid><dc:creator>PowerShellTeam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;No codename for Version 2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;jps&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>