<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>PTaylor's WebLog : Windows</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/tags/Windows/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Windows</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Vista OOM fix:Must have update from the mother-ship</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/2007/08/13/vista-oom-fix-must-have-update-from-the-mother-ship.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4372423</guid><dc:creator>Phil Taylor</dc:creator><slash:comments>23</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/comments/4372423.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4372423</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=4372423</wfw:comment><description>&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;FONT face=arial,helvetica,sans-serif&gt;&lt;B&gt;Aug 28th&lt;/B&gt;&amp;nbsp;a fix became available for Vista from the Windows team.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;FONT face=arial,helvetica,sans-serif&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;FONT face=arial,helvetica,sans-serif&gt;The&amp;nbsp;bits will be made generally available from the link&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/940105" mce_href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/940105"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face=arial,helvetica,sans-serif&gt; and relatively detailed KB is attached.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;FONT face=arial,helvetica,sans-serif&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;FONT face=arial,helvetica,sans-serif&gt;The issue is that Vista was creating an extra copy of graphics memory ( noted by AnandTech &lt;A class="" href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3044" mce_href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3044"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face=arial,helvetica,sans-serif&gt;) and that was causing a pre-mature exhaustion of each process's address space and then the dreaded OOM error. AnandTech reviews this issue further and tests the hotfix &lt;A class="" href="http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=3060" mce_href="http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=3060"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;FONT face=arial,helvetica,sans-serif&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;FONT face=arial,helvetica,sans-serif&gt;Run, don't walk to this download.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4372423" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/tags/Flight+Simulator/default.aspx">Flight Simulator</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/tags/PC+Games/default.aspx">PC Games</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/tags/flightsimx/default.aspx">flightsimx</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/tags/flight+simulator+flightsimx/default.aspx">flight simulator flightsimx</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/tags/fsx/default.aspx">fsx</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/tags/tips/default.aspx">tips</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/tags/OS+Updates/default.aspx">OS Updates</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/tags/Vista/default.aspx">Vista</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/tags/Windows/default.aspx">Windows</category></item><item><title>Windows update ( XP and Vista )  for Intel multi-core processors.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/2007/07/16/windows-update-xp-and-vista-for-intel-multi-core-processors.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3903576</guid><dc:creator>Phil Taylor</dc:creator><slash:comments>12</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/comments/3903576.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3903576</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3903576</wfw:comment><description>&lt;P&gt;A microcode update from Intel that affects multi-core processors, &lt;A class="" title="KB 936357" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936357" mce_href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936357"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This seems like a good update to take, even if I don't have much more data than you do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3903576" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/tags/fsx/default.aspx">fsx</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/tags/Multicore/default.aspx">Multicore</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/archive/tags/Windows/default.aspx">Windows</category></item></channel></rss>