<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>I Smell a Parameter!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx</link><description>Parameters are a useful way to improve overall system performance when there are many common queries with the same shape. Instead of compiling each query, one plan can be used for all similar queries. This can significantly reduce CPU overhead and improve</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: I Smell a Parameter!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#566709</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 04:02:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:566709</guid><dc:creator>GilM</dc:creator><description>Good stuff!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This might be a good chance to lead into a discussion of plan guides, for users of third-party apps (like Siebel) that generate queries dynamically and don't allow adding hints directly to them; but still suffer with these problems of atypical parameters used in plan caching.</description></item><item><title>re: I Smell a Parameter!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#569752</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 12:46:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:569752</guid><dc:creator>Ayende Rahien</dc:creator><description>Can SQL Server get the parameter data from the a parametrized query as well?&lt;br&gt;That is, if I issue a parameterized query from ADO.Net, willit be able to optimize the plan based on the parameter value?</description></item><item><title>re: I Smell a Parameter!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#577935</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:46:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:577935</guid><dc:creator>bartduncan</dc:creator><description>Yes, parameterized queries can be sniffed just like stored procs. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>IFNULL (location_id, 99) = COALESCE(@my_location_id, IFNULL(location_id, 99))</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#599701</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 11:13:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:599701</guid><dc:creator>Tony Rogerson's ramblings</dc:creator><description>Hopefully this will put to bed the lobby that recommends you use COALESCE for queries that have optional...</description></item><item><title>Query Processing -- introduction to the blog!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#771427</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:52:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:771427</guid><dc:creator>Tips, Tricks, and Advice from the SQL Server Query Processing Team</dc:creator><description>Since we’re starting a new blog for the whole query processing team, we think it’s appropriate to start...</description></item><item><title>Compilation Time Issues in OLTP Applications When Upgrading to SQL 2005</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#774473</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:45:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774473</guid><dc:creator>Tips, Tricks, and Advice from the SQL Server Query Processing Team</dc:creator><description>I've helped a lot of people upgrade their SQL 2000 applications to SQL 2005.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;While many of...</description></item><item><title>Compilation Time Issues in OLTP Applications When Upgrading to SQL 2005</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#820982</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:45:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:820982</guid><dc:creator>Tips, Tricks, and Advice from the SQL Server Query Processing Team</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've helped a lot of people upgrade their SQL 2000 applications to SQL 2005. While many of these upgrades&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>4.0 Query Parameterization </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#1489899</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:56:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1489899</guid><dc:creator>SQL Programmability &amp; API Development Team Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Using parameters or parameter markers in queries increases the ability of SQL Server to reuse compiled&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Elegant Code &amp;raquo; SQL Parameter Sniffing and what to do about it</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#8517572</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 19:53:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8517572</guid><dc:creator>Elegant Code &amp;raquo; SQL Parameter Sniffing and what to do about it</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://elegantcode.com/2008/05/17/sql-parameter-sniffing-and-what-to-do-about-it/"&gt;http://elegantcode.com/2008/05/17/sql-parameter-sniffing-and-what-to-do-about-it/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Poor performance from Application &amp;laquo; Motherofallgeeks&amp;#8217;s Blog</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#9159340</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:20:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9159340</guid><dc:creator>Poor performance from Application &amp;laquo; Motherofallgeeks&amp;#8217;s Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://motherofallgeeks.com/2008/12/01/poor-performance-from-application/"&gt;http://motherofallgeeks.com/2008/12/01/poor-performance-from-application/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>OPTIMIZE FOR UNKNOWN - How could that possibly make any sense???</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#9328922</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:55:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9328922</guid><dc:creator>Conor vs. SQL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I'm alive. I have been chatting with my wife about the times I need to &amp;quot;go dark&amp;quot; - in this case,&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Wierd performance problem. | keyongtech</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#9362123</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:31:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9362123</guid><dc:creator>Wierd performance problem. | keyongtech</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.keyongtech.com/400015-wierd-performance-problem"&gt;http://www.keyongtech.com/400015-wierd-performance-problem&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>DotNetBob on SQL  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Forced Pamareterization Pros and Cons</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#9431533</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:25:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9431533</guid><dc:creator>DotNetBob on SQL  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Forced Pamareterization Pros and Cons</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://sql.dotnetbob.com/?p=55"&gt;http://sql.dotnetbob.com/?p=55&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. Dynamic SQL vs. Procedures vs. Plan Quality for Parameterized Queries</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/queryoptteam/archive/2006/03/31/565991.aspx#9693854</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:39:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9693854</guid><dc:creator>Conor vs. SQL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I received a question from a customer today about query plan choice for a parameterized query - specifically&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>