<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Great Debate: Store Procedure vs. Dynamic SQL</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rajandwivedi/archive/2009/04/28/great-debate-store-procedure-vs-dynamic-sql.aspx</link><description>This is one of those topics that always generate a lot of heat among developers, architects and DBAs etc. People typically take a very strong stance on one approach over the other. As most of the IT situations, the answer to this question is : “It Depends”.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Great Debate: Store Procedure vs. Dynamic SQL | Microsoft Share Point</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rajandwivedi/archive/2009/04/28/great-debate-store-procedure-vs-dynamic-sql.aspx#9574337</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:15:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9574337</guid><dc:creator>Great Debate: Store Procedure vs. Dynamic SQL | Microsoft Share Point</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://microsoft-sharepoint.simplynetdev.com/great-debate-store-procedure-vs-dynamic-sql/"&gt;http://microsoft-sharepoint.simplynetdev.com/great-debate-store-procedure-vs-dynamic-sql/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>