<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>More Haskell in Java 7 or 8?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ralflammel/archive/2006/12/21/more-haskell-in-java-7-or-8.aspx</link><description>So C# (3.0) has lambdas, list-processing functions, some good amount of type inference … hey, who would have thought that mainstream OO programming would get so much less dysfunctional say just 2 years ago. Now Haskell is cool for many reasons other than</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: More Haskell in Java 7 or 8?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ralflammel/archive/2006/12/21/more-haskell-in-java-7-or-8.aspx#1349710</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:43:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1349710</guid><dc:creator>grauenwolf</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;How does your &amp;quot;Retroactive Interface Implementation&amp;quot; compare with VB9's Dynamic Interfaces? &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Generalized vs. dynamic interfaces</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ralflammel/archive/2006/12/21/more-haskell-in-java-7-or-8.aspx#1350531</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:27:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1350531</guid><dc:creator>Grammarware, Haskellware, XMLware</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In a comment on “ More Haskell in Java 7 or 8? ”, I get this question “How does your `Retroactive Interface&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>