<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Generalized vs. dynamic interfaces</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ralflammel/archive/2006/12/23/generalized-vs-dynamic-interfaces.aspx</link><description>In a comment on “ More Haskell in Java 7 or 8? ”, I get this question “How does your `Retroactive Interface Implementation’ [in JavaGI ] compare with VB9's `dynamic Interfaces?’” Very much appreciated question! At this point in time (but this might change</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Generalized vs. dynamic interfaces</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ralflammel/archive/2006/12/23/generalized-vs-dynamic-interfaces.aspx#1365909</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:48:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1365909</guid><dc:creator>MKane91301</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in April I made a suggestion along these lines (&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=90794"&gt;https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=90794&lt;/a&gt;). There's a word document attached, though I can't figure out how to get to it in the new feedback web site. You may be interested in looking at it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>