<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Remote Desktop 6.0, Network Level Authentication not work on OS prior Vista...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rextang/archive/2007/03/28/remote-desktop-6-0-network-level-authentication-not-work-on-os-prior-vista.aspx</link><description>Just a small tip for people using Remote Desktop very often, like me. Microsoft released new version of Remote Desktop , on version 6.0 , which has more support on the ease of use of Terminal Service. one of the features I like very much is the support</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Movies &amp;raquo; Rexiology@MSDN : Remote Desktop 6.0 Network Level Authentication not &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rextang/archive/2007/03/28/remote-desktop-6-0-network-level-authentication-not-work-on-os-prior-vista.aspx#6941935</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:32:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6941935</guid><dc:creator>Movies » Rexiology@MSDN : Remote Desktop 6.0 Network Level Authentication not …</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://movies.247blogging.info/?p=3726"&gt;http://movies.247blogging.info/?p=3726&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Remote Desktop 6.0, Network Level Authentication not work on OS prior Vista...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rextang/archive/2007/03/28/remote-desktop-6-0-network-level-authentication-not-work-on-os-prior-vista.aspx#8617108</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:45:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8617108</guid><dc:creator>SecurityEnthusiast</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Just to prevent misunderstanding, since people tend to follow advice given on MSDN blogs -- you should NOT turn off NLA on Vista anymore.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead, upgrade your Remote Desktop client on XP, 2K3, or Mac OS X. &amp;nbsp;The new versions, released in the past year, all support NLA.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Remote Desktop 6.0, Network Level Authentication not work on OS prior Vista...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rextang/archive/2007/03/28/remote-desktop-6-0-network-level-authentication-not-work-on-os-prior-vista.aspx#8617170</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:59:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8617170</guid><dc:creator>rextangtw</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;SecurityEnthusiast:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, you are right. when this post was composed there were still lots of XP client running old version of Remote Desktop Client, also , the new version was not been as an optional windows update patch yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;for now, when running windows update on XP or 2003 clients, there are optional patch contains new version of Remote Desktop which supports NLA without no problems, install that to strength your security.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Remote Desktop 6.0, Network Level Authentication not work on OS prior Vista...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rextang/archive/2007/03/28/remote-desktop-6-0-network-level-authentication-not-work-on-os-prior-vista.aspx#9855904</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 07:58:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9855904</guid><dc:creator>EPMerc</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, its the other way around, my Xp desktop can remotely access my vista laptop. However, when I attempt to remotely access my xp desktop using my vista laptop, I get the following &amp;nbsp;message during logon: &amp;quot;The local policy of this system does not permit you to logon interactively&amp;quot;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will appreciate an instructional solution, please. thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>