<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>VS 2008 and SourceSafe Q&amp;amp;A</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/12/03/vs-2008-and-sourcesafe-q-a.aspx</link><description>My post about VS 2008 and the SourceSafe CTP generated lots of questions . I'll do my best to answer all of them. Q: Why wasn't this information in the VS2008 README? A: It should have been. It was definitely in the Orcas Beta1 and Beta2 READMEs. I haven't</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Free People Searches &amp;raquo; VS 2008 and SourceSafe Q&amp;amp;A</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/12/03/vs-2008-and-sourcesafe-q-a.aspx#6647763</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 02:01:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6647763</guid><dc:creator>Free People Searches » VS 2008 and SourceSafe Q&amp;A</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.absolutely-people-search.info/?p=2613"&gt;http://www.absolutely-people-search.info/?p=2613&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: VS 2008 and SourceSafe Q&amp;A</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/12/03/vs-2008-and-sourcesafe-q-a.aspx#6667623</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:46:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6667623</guid><dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As for the final GDR, its official name will be &amp;quot;SourceSafe 2005 Update.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Much better. &amp;nbsp;If we do another one, I'd like to see an even simpler naming scheme, such as &amp;quot;SourceSafe 2005b&amp;quot; -&amp;gt; &amp;quot;2005c&amp;quot; -&amp;gt; etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-------------------------------&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So why not start with &amp;quot;SourceSafe 2005a&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;SourceSafe 2005b&amp;quot; -&amp;gt; etc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s pretty clear that “b” is newer that “a” but is not clear at all that “Update” is newer than “b”. How can you possible be certain that “Update” came before “b” and not after “b”? You can take an educated guess but it’s just a guess. No point on having people searching for build dates etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In reality it would probably be best to keep it simple and stick to the standard “SourceSafe 2005 SP1”, “SourceSafe 2005 SP2” etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh yeah, and what’s up with all this acronyms (TLA GDR CTP, etc, etc), this is very annoying to say the least, I which you guys put a link under those words pointing to their definition!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: VS 2008 and SourceSafe Q&amp;A</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/12/03/vs-2008-and-sourcesafe-q-a.aspx#6726079</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:09:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6726079</guid><dc:creator>Richard Berg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I explain the difference between various acronyms here: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/06/06/sourcesafe-2005-gdr-first-release-around-the-corner.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/06/06/sourcesafe-2005-gdr-first-release-around-the-corner.aspx&lt;/a&gt; (or tried to)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: VS 2008 and SourceSafe Q&amp;A</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/12/03/vs-2008-and-sourcesafe-q-a.aspx#6762993</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:53:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6762993</guid><dc:creator>Wyatt Wong</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I agreed with Rene who said about the naming of VSS2005 Update, which should stick to the convention of VSS2005 SP1, SP2, etc. Unless Microsoft is sure that they will provide ONE and ONLY ONE VSS2005 Update !&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also agreed with Rene about those terms like GDR, TLA, it's a bit annoying. CTP (Community Technology Preview) should be more understandable by most people !&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>[导入]VS2008使用VSS做源代码管理需要注意的一点</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/12/03/vs-2008-and-sourcesafe-q-a.aspx#6979874</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:35:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6979874</guid><dc:creator>HappyQQ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;上个月ScottGuthrie的博客中提到，VS2008如果用VSS做源代码管理，会有一些bug。在他的博客中提到：“我们正在更新VisualSourceSafe2005，以使它...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>VS2008使用VSS做源代码管理需要注意的一点</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/12/03/vs-2008-and-sourcesafe-q-a.aspx#7151489</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7151489</guid><dc:creator>ASP.NET Chinese Blogs</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;上个月 Scott Guthrie 的博客中提到， VS2008 如果用 VSS 做源代码管理，会有一些bug。 在他的博客中提到： “我们正在更新Visual SourceSafe 2005，以使它能和VS&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 and Visual SourceSafe</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/12/03/vs-2008-and-sourcesafe-q-a.aspx#8202332</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:39:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8202332</guid><dc:creator>IliaJ on  .NET</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 and Visual SourceSafe&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>VS2008使用VSS做源代码管理需要注意的一点   </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/12/03/vs-2008-and-sourcesafe-q-a.aspx#8324586</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:39:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8324586</guid><dc:creator>大鱼林</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;上个月ScottGuthrie的博客中提到，VS2008如果用VSS做源代码管理，会有一些bug。在他的博客中提到：&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>