<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What Service Orientation is NOT!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2006/01/19/515145.aspx</link><description>In his wonderful reply to my pre-Xmas post on different perspective of Service Orientation where I tried to convey an alternative way of thinking about the subject, David Ing takes a stab at stating how he would define Service Orientation to his grandmother:</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: What Service Orientation is NOT!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2006/01/19/515145.aspx#515168</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 04:50:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:515168</guid><dc:creator>Blake Handler</dc:creator><description>Not that I wish to disagree with someone with “666” in their nickname – but the metaphor “explain it to your grandmother” is simply that . . .  a metaphor. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It means you have such a thorough understanding of a subject that you CAN explain it to anyone. I personally doubt that he meant that he wished to spend his time with his grandmother discussing computers. (^_^)</description></item><item><title>re: What Service Orientation is NOT!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2006/01/19/515145.aspx#515283</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:20:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:515283</guid><dc:creator>Christophe Gricourt</dc:creator><description>Before you can explain SO to your grandmother, I think you should try to explain it to your CIO/CTO and even to your end user. Even in France (not only in Redmond) They usually don't buy negative definitions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SO is the way to stop seeing your information system as a business stopper and turn it into a business enabler.&lt;br&gt;In other words SO is about bridging the gap between business and technology.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SO is seeing your information system as a set of services it can fulfill instead of a set of technologies it is made of.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SO is about packaging (with the marketing connotation) your information system in order to reach a broader audience (yes, that does also mean interop) and even create the need instead of just responding to it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: What Service Orientation is NOT!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2006/01/19/515145.aspx#515297</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:20:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:515297</guid><dc:creator>Tom Fuller</dc:creator><description>As you know I absolutely love this debate.  My interest for this very topic started when an animated Welshmen posed the question to a room of architects when he was leading the Indigo Road Show in Tampa ... maybe you know him :) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do agree with you that it is easier to explain what SO is not.  I also think that it's easier to sometimes explain what it can do.  I know it's not a traditional answer to the 'What is SOA' question but I personally like this type of a definition:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Service Orientation is an application delivery strategy that focuses on delivering loosely coupled building block services that can be quickly aggregated into new meaningful applications.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This usually shifts the conversation to things like workflows and enterprise portals which business users tend to 'get'.  Helping people understand the value and helping people understand what makes this 'seemingly new' (I realize it's not new but everyone thinks it is) application development strategy great is where I tend to take the conversation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thoughts?  I still don't think my grandmother will want to hear it.  If my grandmother is an analogy for business sponsor then ok I think my 'grandmother' does want to hear the definition I have above.</description></item><item><title>re: What Service Orientation is NOT!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2006/01/19/515145.aspx#516158</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:14:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:516158</guid><dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator><description>WIF? WTF? or should I ask? &lt;br&gt;/P</description></item><item><title>re: What Service Orientation is NOT!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2006/01/19/515145.aspx#516342</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:26:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:516342</guid><dc:creator>RichTurner666</dc:creator><description>Blake ... duuuude ... you need a sense of humour!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tom ... glad to see you wade in here! :) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Paul ... glad to see you're still around and stirring the pot! ;) I am guessing at what branding will do with a new piece of technology I now own ... nothing set in stone yet so I won't go into it just yet, but keep your eyes peeled! ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Christophe ... thanks for your thought, although I respectfully disagree with your assertion that SO/A has anything to do with interop ... that's an implementation detail and should not be permitted to leak into the level of discussion that SO/A should be limited to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When someone architects a house, they do not define which way a bolt should be turned in order to tighten it. In the same way, when we architect a system, we should not define how two systems will communicate across a wire. Doing so tarnishes an architecture with implemnentation detail and significantly diminishes our ability to cleanly architect a system that satisfies a business need by coupling business requirements to implementation/technology details.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is why I argue so strongly that technology specifics should be kept out of discussions carried out at the SO/A level.</description></item><item><title>Newsflash</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2006/01/19/515145.aspx#519200</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:12:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:519200</guid><dc:creator>Dennis van der Stelt</dc:creator><description>Sometimes I'm reading up on my subscribed weblogs and just see so much that I want to share. Inspired...</description></item><item><title>Cider with Richard...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2006/01/19/515145.aspx#520605</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:33:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:520605</guid><dc:creator>From 9 till 2</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Newsflash</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2006/01/19/515145.aspx#1184567</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:37:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1184567</guid><dc:creator>Dennis' Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes I'm reading up on my subscribed weblogs and just see so much that I want to share. Inspired&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>¿Confundido con la Orientación a Servicios?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2006/01/19/515145.aspx#1495418</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:19:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1495418</guid><dc:creator>Kamikaze Reloaded</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Si alguna vez han intentado definir o explicarle a alguien qu&amp;#233; es Orientaci&amp;#243;n a Servicios (SO, Service&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>New and Notable 90</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2006/01/19/515145.aspx#4769260</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:46:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4769260</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have finally reached number 90 as this series has been going for years although its the first one here&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>New and Notable 90</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2006/01/19/515145.aspx#4770242</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:38:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4770242</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile Personal Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have finally reached number 90 as this series has been going for years although its the first one here&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>New and Notable 90</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2006/01/19/515145.aspx#9181607</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 04:33:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9181607</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile's Blog (if (DeveloperTask == Communication &amp;&amp; OS == Windows)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have finally reached number 90 as this series has been going for years although its the first one here. Today is a big day for me/us - its Heather's Birthday! My daughter turns 3 today! I'm already thinking of the teenage years I am going to have to&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>