<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>On the road to Indigo - Is .NET Remoting Dead? [Updated]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx</link><description>'Is .NET Remoting Dead?' [Updated] No ! Nope ! Niet ! Non ! Negative ! Nuh-huh ! [shake head vigorously] !!! This has been SUCH a hard message to communicate, so let&amp;#8217;s make this VERY clear: .NET Remoting as we know it in the current .NET frameworks</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: On the road to Indigo - Is .NET Remoting Dead?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#84820</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2004 20:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:84820</guid><dc:creator>Paul Wilson</dc:creator><description>Very nicely put.  Of course that 666 in your name does make one wonder . . .</description></item><item><title>On the path to Indigo: Prescriptive Guidance for Today's Technologies</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#84836</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2004 00:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:84836</guid><dc:creator>RichTurner666's WebLog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>On the path to Indigo: Prescriptive Guidance for Today's Technologies</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#84877</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2004 01:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:84877</guid><dc:creator>RichTurner666's WebLog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>.NET Remoting: </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#85656</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 04:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:85656</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Key</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: On the road to Indigo - Is .NET Remoting Dead? [Updated]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#86159</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 21:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:86159</guid><dc:creator>Roman Kiss</dc:creator><description>RemoteObject Service doesn't support the &amp;quot;SingleCall&amp;quot; feature of the .Net Remoting. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- How the Indigo model will handle a stateless call to the endpoint in one round trip (creating the instance and invoking the method)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Roman</description></item><item><title>Remoting post updated ... again! ;)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#90766</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:90766</guid><dc:creator>On the road to Indigo</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: On the road to Indigo - Is .NET Remoting Dead? [Updated]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#91144</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:91144</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]</dc:creator><description>Rich,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am having a hard time determining what your updates to old posts are.  If you could highlight updates in some way, it would be appreciated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other than that, keep up the good work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Nick</description></item><item><title>re: On the road to Indigo - Is .NET Remoting Dead? [Updated]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#91314</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:91314</guid><dc:creator>Rich Turner</dc:creator><description>Thanks for the note Nick. Alas, this is one of the problems with using a blog as a way of centrally publishing a message that may evolve over time! I don't want readers to read an evolving thread in case they miss future, important updates, so have opted to update the original posting instead. I take your point though and will color highlight new/changed bits as I go along.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for reading ... keep the feedback coming y'all! :D</description></item><item><title>re: On the road to Indigo - Is .NET Remoting Dead? [Updated]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#97300</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2004 06:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:97300</guid><dc:creator>Fallon Massey</dc:creator><description>What about IIS remoting.  Will it still be supported and fall under the umbrella of all other remoting.</description></item><item><title>re: On the road to Indigo - Is .NET Remoting Dead? [Updated]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#127658</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 04:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:127658</guid><dc:creator>Keith Hill</dc:creator><description>With this guidance, does this mean that the recommendation for application scripting either on the same host or different host is to use ASMX now?  I still don't quite get what the .NET replacement is for the typical automation server/object model you find in apps like Excel, Word, etc.  I would have guessed .NET Remoting but that doesn't seem to be the recommendation here.</description></item><item><title>re: On the road to Indigo - Is .NET Remoting Dead? [Updated]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#137536</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 20:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:137536</guid><dc:creator>Richard Turner</dc:creator><description>Ermmmm ... .NET Remoting is nothing to do with OLE Automation in applications like Word. In the future, I think it will be safe to expect applications to expose their functionality via .NET assemblies. I think it relatively unlikely that apps like Word will publish their capabilities as Web Services, although I don't work for the Office team, so I may be wrong ;) There is a new command-line/scripting environment under development - although I don't have details on this just yet.</description></item><item><title>IS OO Dead?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#151067</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 20:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:151067</guid><dc:creator>On the road to Indigo</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: On the road to Indigo - Is .NET Remoting Dead? [Updated]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#158282</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:158282</guid><dc:creator>Michele Leroux Bustamante</dc:creator><description>&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;&lt;a target="_new" href="http://www.dasblonde.net/PermaLink.aspx?guid=e7a878ff-8ee3-4681-b0fe-3db28b7c6acb&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.NET"&gt;http://www.dasblonde.net/PermaLink.aspx?guid=e7a878ff-8ee3-4681-b0fe-3db28b7c6acb&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.NET&lt;/a&gt; Remoting, Enterprise Services and the Future - Indigo&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;</description></item><item><title>re: donBox on DCOM</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#171723</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2004 15:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:171723</guid><dc:creator>Just Coding</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: On the road to Indigo - Is .NET Remoting Dead? [Updated]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#186883</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:186883</guid><dc:creator>Rich Turner</dc:creator><description>I am not entirely sure what you're alluding to here Alex. Since when did COM+ disappear? If you look at Microsoft's product support plans, Windows technologies are supported for 5 years from the date of release + 5 years extended support. This applies to COM+, DCOM, .NET Remoting etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's say that Longhorn ships in late 2006 (this may or may not happen - we'll just as this date as an illustration). Longhorn will ship new versions of COM+, .NET Fx (including Remoting , etc) as well as Indigo. That means that this release of these technologies will be supported until 2016. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There next version of our OS Blackcomb will also ship these technologies and just taking a wild-stab at a 2011 release date will see support expiring in 2021.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you can extrapolate the next steps.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As you can see - none of this technology is disappearing any time soon.</description></item><item><title>Definitive word on Remoting going forward ...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#258447</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:258447</guid><dc:creator>J.net</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Yes, Virginia, Remoting Does Have a Future</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#258459</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:258459</guid><dc:creator>Frankie Fresh's Blog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Yes, Virginia, Remoting Does Have a Future</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#258460</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:258460</guid><dc:creator>Frankie Fresh's Blog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>.NET Remoting is not dead, but it is done...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#258555</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 02:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:258555</guid><dc:creator>Deep Thoughts...</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>.NET Remoting and NLB ... some interesting links.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#357957</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:357957</guid><dc:creator>Willy-Peter Schaub</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Future of .Net Remoting</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#404895</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:404895</guid><dc:creator>Xtreme.Net's Blog</dc:creator><description>Check this writing about .Net Remoting&amp;amp;nbsp;from Richard Turner's Blog </description></item><item><title>re: On the road to Indigo - Is .NET Remoting Dead? [Updated]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#436197</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 22:08:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:436197</guid><dc:creator>Garrett Serack</dc:creator><description>I'm a tad concerned about the statement:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot; The simple statement '.NET Remoting will be depricated once Indigo is released' &amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Use .NET Remoting for calling between components hosted in different app-domains inside the same process&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, I'm using .NET remoting for this purpose, but you used the &amp;quot;deprecated&amp;quot; word.  Is that truly it? or just de-emphasized?  Indigo is obviously overkill for inter-appdomain communication, but is remoting going to seem like the lame duck in 5 years for inter-appdomain communication?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seems funny to me given the push towards remoting a few years back. (jeez, is it alread 2005?)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Garrett&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: On the road to Indigo - Is .NET Remoting Dead? [Updated]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#437653</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:08:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:437653</guid><dc:creator>Rich Turner</dc:creator><description>Hey Garrett - just stumbled onto your question - I don't get notified of general comments posted to the blog so please forgive my slow reply.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I understand your concern. While you can remain confident that .NET Remoting (or any of our other distributed technologies) is not being removed from the platfrom, it is also very important to understand that it will not be recieving any significant engineering after we ship .NET Frameworks 2.0 (which has added a few nice-to-have's to Remoting).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indigo V1 doesn't provide a cross-app-domain communications channel a la .NET Remoting, but it's on the cards for vNext! No guarantees, but it's on the requested features list!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bottom line is that if you're using Remoting today, your app will doubtlessly be able to run for many years to come, but if you're looking to the future, Indigo is the strategic way forwards.</description></item><item><title>re: On the road to Indigo - Is .NET Remoting Dead? [Updated]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#437964</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:26:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:437964</guid><dc:creator>gserack</dc:creator><description>Rich, Thanks for getting back to me :).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wasn't really worried about the future compatability, as Microsoft has done me no wrong with that sort of thing before.  I am very excited to see that you folks have been thinking about the use of Indigo in the future with cross app-domain communications. That fact alone confirms my faith in the process ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My only other concern at this point is maintaining the simpicity that Remoting provided to jr Developers. In some ways, not having to declare a separate interface was kinda nice.  It tended to confuse the kids less :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, thanks for the reply.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Garrett</description></item><item><title>nice</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#460139</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 22:06:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:460139</guid><dc:creator>Benny</dc:creator><description>Super site!</description></item><item><title>Improved .NET Remoting in 2.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#464342</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 07:09:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:464342</guid><dc:creator>Dennis Forbes</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Remoting post updated ... again! ;)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#469168</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:02:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:469168</guid><dc:creator>On the road to Indigo</dc:creator><description>I have just made a small change to my posting about Remoting, including details of WHY Indigo won't interop...</description></item><item><title>New Direction</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#534495</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:534495</guid><dc:creator>Welcome to The Metaverse</dc:creator><description>Long-time followers of my blog will no doubt remember when I started this blog in Feb 2004. I began by...</description></item><item><title>Rich Turner is the Product Manager for InfoCard - yes,yup, da, oui, ja ja ja!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#535041</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:24:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:535041</guid><dc:creator>Julie Lerman Blog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Is Remoting Dead?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#604331</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 05:05:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:604331</guid><dc:creator>Kent Brown</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>[PL] Zaległe pytanie - przyszłość COM?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#8414909</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:12:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8414909</guid><dc:creator>Only Human | Devoted to technology v.2.0</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;W lutym w ramach propozycji pytań do Steve'a Sinofsky dostałem parę propozycji, kt&amp;amp;#243;rych jak na złość&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Sockets o .Net Remoting | hilpers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#9350182</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:23:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9350182</guid><dc:creator>Sockets o .Net Remoting | hilpers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.hilpers-esp.com/441332-sockets-o-net-remoting"&gt;http://www.hilpers-esp.com/441332-sockets-o-net-remoting&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>COM+ or Web Service? | keyongtech</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#9361748</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:47:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9361748</guid><dc:creator>COM+ or Web Service? | keyongtech</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.keyongtech.com/416629-com-or-web-service"&gt;http://www.keyongtech.com/416629-com-or-web-service&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Welcome to The Metaverse On the road to Indigo Is NET Remoting | Paid Surveys</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#9660846</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 02:40:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9660846</guid><dc:creator> Welcome to The Metaverse On the road to Indigo Is NET Remoting | Paid Surveys</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=welcome-to-the-metaverse-on-the-road-to-indigo-is-net-remoting"&gt;http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=welcome-to-the-metaverse-on-the-road-to-indigo-is-net-remoting&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Welcome to The Metaverse On the road to Indigo Is NET Remoting | fix my credit</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#9763836</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:33:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9763836</guid><dc:creator> Welcome to The Metaverse On the road to Indigo Is NET Remoting | fix my credit</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://fixmycrediteasily.info/story.php?id=14839"&gt;http://fixmycrediteasily.info/story.php?id=14839&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Welcome to The Metaverse On the road to Indigo Is NET Remoting | patio umbrella</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/richardt/archive/2004/03/05/84771.aspx#9772040</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:30:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9772040</guid><dc:creator> Welcome to The Metaverse On the road to Indigo Is NET Remoting | patio umbrella</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://patioumbrellasource.info/story.php?id=364"&gt;http://patioumbrellasource.info/story.php?id=364&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>