<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Of Strings and Services</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2004/06/23/163793.aspx</link><description>Here's some Q&amp;amp;A that followed a recent internal performance talk that I thought was generally useful. 1) Is there a way to browse and cleanup allocated resources on request completion for webservice? It's generally a very bad idea to try to mess with</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Of Strings and Services</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2004/06/23/163793.aspx#163888</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 17:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:163888</guid><dc:creator>Jerry Pisk</dc:creator><description>I was always wondering, how do you get your time in GC that high? I think my counter is broken, it shows 0.004%, all the time, even under somewhat high load.</description></item><item><title>re: Of Strings and Services</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2004/06/23/163793.aspx#163949</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:163949</guid><dc:creator>Rico Mariani</dc:creator><description>*shrug* works for me :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously, many people use this counter regularly.  And I'd love to see us at 0.004% but I think that's a wee bit to low to expect at this point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Try the machine-wide counters for comparison and if that doesn't help you to see what's going on perhaps opening an issue with PSS is the way to go.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Generally speaking, I am well equipped to offer guidance and usage suggestions and even comment on particular patterns and practices but I'm totally the wrong person to troubleshoot a particular problem like you're having.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really want our customers to get quality service on whatever their particular problem is (or better yet, not have the problem in the first place).  In this case, I'm not quality service :)</description></item><item><title>re: Of Strings and Services</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2004/06/23/163793.aspx#163989</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:163989</guid><dc:creator>Jerry Pisk</dc:creator><description>Heh, mine was more of a rhetoretical question, I've spent a lot of time reading articles like yours to understand how to write a well performing app. I just didn't expect that counter to be THAT low :)</description></item><item><title>re: Of Strings and Services</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2004/06/23/163793.aspx#163993</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:163993</guid><dc:creator>Rico Mariani</dc:creator><description>Give me a few versions, we're working on it :)</description></item></channel></rss>