http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2007/06/13/partly-sunny-chance-of-showers-bring-an-umbrella.aspxEveryone knows that my 10 rules of performance are measure, measure, measure... etc. 10 times :) OK, well, if you didn't know, now you do. But does that mean that every time you tell someone about performance problems and/or risks that you should be doingen-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2007/06/13/partly-sunny-chance-of-showers-bring-an-umbrella.aspx#3279011Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:22:36 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3279011Travis Simon<p>An idea for an upcoming article: I would like to see measurements (and explanations) on LINQ's performance. I am currently stuck in .Net 2.0 land, but am still curious for when we make the transition.</p> <p>Gut feeling: slow. But, who knows?</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2007/06/13/partly-sunny-chance-of-showers-bring-an-umbrella.aspx#3312531Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:52:46 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3312531AlSki<p>Another issue here is that both performance and weather are localised. I commute over a hundred miles a day so this morning I got up put on my raincoat, and met my fellow travellers who included a young lady with summer shoes in her bag. Down in London my sunglasses come out.</p> <p>Performance can be just as variable. I develop lots of code on a single core laptop, and a dual core desktop, then release through various test environments into a production system. Our UAT system is (currently) faster than our production. So any performance measurement that I can make has to always be subjective. 56 seconds on one box can be five on another. </p> <p>The good news is that performance between environments is relative, unlike weather between locations. What I need is to hear is that its going to slow while my laptop simulates a three box environment, that it will run fine in UAT, but I have to know what factor it will be slower when it gets to production. If I run an isolated performance test in UAT will it be 2x or 50x faster than Prod at the busiest time of the day, and so will my 56 seconds become 2 mintes or 45 minutes.</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2007/06/13/partly-sunny-chance-of-showers-bring-an-umbrella.aspx#3393809Tue, 19 Jun 2007 03:53:22 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3393809Norman Diamond<p>Hey wait a minute. &nbsp;The OPTIMAL response to partly sunny, chance of showers, is to bring part of an umbrella.</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2007/06/13/partly-sunny-chance-of-showers-bring-an-umbrella.aspx#7457203Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:12:54 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7457203Wes' Puzzling Blog<p>While writing an Outlook addin, lots of people feel that they should try to help with Outlook performance</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2007/06/13/partly-sunny-chance-of-showers-bring-an-umbrella.aspx#8723881Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:41:28 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8723881Web Log di Raffaele Rialdi<p>Leggere docx (Office OpenXML) via Linq</p>