<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Just Coding</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/default.aspx</link><description>Spanish Developer Bits
</description><dc:language>es-ES</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Obsolete Silverlight Error</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2010/02/23/obsolete-silverlight-error.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:52:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9968272</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9968272.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9968272</wfw:commentRss><description>&amp;#160;...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2010/02/23/obsolete-silverlight-error.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9968272" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/Web/default.aspx">Web</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/Tips/default.aspx">Tips</category></item><item><title>The webHttpBinding Magic (another Spotify WCF Client)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2010/02/11/the-webhttpbinding-magic-another-spotify-wcf-client.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9961590</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9961590.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9961590</wfw:commentRss><description>One of the most common programming tasks today is to manage a series of WebRequests, mostly HttpRequests. In .Net we have been using the system.net.httpwebrequest.aspx class and friends like system.net.webclient.aspx to manage the URL I/O. If you need...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2010/02/11/the-webhttpbinding-magic-another-spotify-wcf-client.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9961590" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/Code/default.aspx">Code</category></item><item><title>Tracing WCF Messages</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/12/10/tracing-wcf-messages.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:24:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9935392</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9935392.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9935392</wfw:commentRss><description>Every time I tried WCF tracing and svctraceviewer I got stucked with the vast amount of information it generates. If you just need to inspect your messages, here is the simplest configuration I’ve found: &amp;#160; &amp;lt; configuration &amp;gt; &amp;#160; &amp;lt; system.diagnostics...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/12/10/tracing-wcf-messages.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9935392" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Great ALM Icons</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/11/19/great-alm-icons.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:20:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9924863</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9924863.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9924863</wfw:commentRss><description>TMap for Visual Studio 2010 [ http://tmap.codeplex.com/ ] is a testing focused process guidance, looks great !! ..and it has a nice icon set to illustrate the software lifecycle like the development and test ones...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/11/19/great-alm-icons.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9924863" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/DevTools/default.aspx">DevTools</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/Agile/default.aspx">Agile</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/alm/default.aspx">alm</category></item><item><title>Moles</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/11/05/moles.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9918411</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9918411.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9918411</wfw:commentRss><description>I’ve been interesting in unit testing for some years now. One major aspect of unit testing is about how use designs that allows a separation of concerns so you can test your program as units (usually at class level), for this the interface basic programming...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/11/05/moles.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9918411" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/DevTools/default.aspx">DevTools</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/Agile/default.aspx">Agile</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/Code/default.aspx">Code</category></item><item><title>A Beta Week (VS2010)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/10/23/a-beta-week-vs2010.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9911743</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9911743.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9911743</wfw:commentRss><description>This week I’ve spent some time to update my new laptop (a LenovoT61p) and to install some fresh bits. Right now I’m running: Windows 7 Enterprise x64 Office 2010 Beta Visual Studio 2010 Beta2 Also I have one VPC running Windows Server 2008 x86 SQL Server...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/10/23/a-beta-week-vs2010.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9911743" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/DevTools/default.aspx">DevTools</category></item><item><title>Debugging VB6 code with Visual Studio 2008</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/10/05/debugging-vb6-code-with-visual-studio-2008.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:54:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9903214</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9903214.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9903214</wfw:commentRss><description>I was reviewing an old DNA app (more on this in a different post) and I got really surprised when I saw that&amp;#160; we can debug VB6 code with VS2008 !!!...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/10/05/debugging-vb6-code-with-visual-studio-2008.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9903214" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/Code/default.aspx">Code</category></item><item><title>Is UX the new Agile?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/09/24/is-ux-the-new-agile.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:27:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9899157</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9899157.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9899157</wfw:commentRss><description>In the last days I’ve seen how the UserXperience movement is getting attention in the community and everyone is doing some kind of “back to the basics” strategy. They recommend early prototype based on sketchs (look at the new Blend+FlowSketch stuff ),...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/09/24/is-ux-the-new-agile.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9899157" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Classic Event Viewer</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/08/24/read-2003-event-logs-from-2008.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9882989</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9882989.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9882989</wfw:commentRss><description>While we migrate all our servers to Windows Server 2008, quite often we need to manage remote event logs from Windows 6.+ machines. However, the new Log Event Viewer introduced in Windows Vista can not read “old” event logs from XP and 2003 machines....(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/08/24/read-2003-event-logs-from-2008.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9882989" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/IT/default.aspx">IT</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/Tips/default.aspx">Tips</category></item><item><title>New Objectives for FY10</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/08/21/new-objectives-for-fy10.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:47:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9878595</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9878595.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9878595</wfw:commentRss><description>The vacation period has ended, my collaboration in the Terra project has finished and now I'm waiting for new consulting assignments. Anyway I’m going to try to set my technical objectives for this brand new fiscal year. 1) Keep this blog updated (at...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/08/21/new-objectives-for-fy10.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9878595" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Terra Project</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/05/04/the-terra-project.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 01:37:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9584981</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9584981.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9584981</wfw:commentRss><description>El principal motivo por el que este blog ha estado tan calladito en los últimos meses, es el proyecto en el que he estado inmerso desde Octubre de 2007. Esta semana el proyecto ha visto la luz: http://noticias.terra.es , ha sido un largo camino, y todavía...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/05/04/the-terra-project.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9584981" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/Terra/default.aspx">Terra</category></item><item><title>VRTA: Como medir el rendimiento de un cliente Web</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/01/23/client-performance-testing.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9371593</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9371593.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9371593</wfw:commentRss><description>Siempre que hablamos de rendimiento de aplicaciones web, instintivamente pensamos en cuantas peticiones concurrentes seremos de aguantar en el servidor, sin embargo, la percepción final del usuario depende de muchos otros factores. Cada vez que solicitamos...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2009/01/23/client-performance-testing.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9371593" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Azure aka RedDog is here</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2008/10/27/azure-aka-reddog-is-here.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9018691</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9018691.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9018691</wfw:commentRss><description>Just one hour ago, Ray Ozzie has announced the new Cloud OS from Microsoft: Windows Azure, it's funny to see the word "windows" since it has no windows at all ;-). A lot of people should be blogging about it right now, so I do not add more comments here...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2008/10/27/azure-aka-reddog-is-here.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9018691" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/pdc/default.aspx">pdc</category></item><item><title>PDC Starts</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2008/10/26/pdc-starts.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9016805</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/9016805.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9016805</wfw:commentRss><description>Not really the PDC, just the Pre-Conf sessions. I've chosen .Net Data Access from A to Z. By now, it's just a quick recap of Data Access technologies from the last years, how long from last time I hear someone talking about RDO or DAO... The session is...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2008/10/26/pdc-starts.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9016805" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/pdc/default.aspx">pdc</category></item><item><title>Choosing a JavaScript library</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2008/09/29/choosing-a-javascript-library.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8968636</guid><dc:creator>rido</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/comments/8968636.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8968636</wfw:commentRss><description>Some months ago I started to dig in different JavaScript libraries like prototype, MooTools, Dojo or jQuery, (see http://delicious.com/rido/javascript for a complete list). As usual, each one has their pro's and con's. Today, Scott Gu has announced a...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/2008/09/29/choosing-a-javascript-library.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8968636" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/rido/archive/tags/code+tools/default.aspx">code tools</category></item></channel></rss>