http://blogs.msdn.com/robcaron/archive/2006/01/23/516505.aspxIn an opinion piece on eWeek today ( Dog Food Doctrine Deserves Debate ), Peter Coffee raises a concern that our (Microsoft’s) dogfooding of Team System may be of little value if your process doesn't match ours. I wonder, though, if Visual Studio Teamen-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/robcaron/archive/2006/01/23/516505.aspx#520429Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:51:11 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:520429Rob CaronYou can watch Soma's VSLive keynote from Monday online, and read Roger Jennings&amp;amp;rsquo; write-up here....http://blogs.msdn.com/robcaron/archive/2006/01/23/516505.aspx#545823Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:40:29 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:545823Peter RitchieI'd much rather see Microsoft dogfooding, especially with Visual Studio Team system than not. &nbsp;There's a more realistic set of use-cases that get performed with real-world use of a product than would otherwise be performed and should lead to higher quality. &nbsp;The quote seems to be grasping a reasons to be negative. <br> <br>Besides, it's hard to test a product for non-existing scenarios; as the majority of software houses have no fixed process.http://blogs.msdn.com/robcaron/archive/2006/01/23/516505.aspx#572893Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:54:35 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:572893Rob CaronIn this post (Debating Dogfood Doctrine) I blogged about how internal teams at Microsoft are also dogfooding...http://blogs.msdn.com/robcaron/archive/2006/01/23/516505.aspx#667420Sun, 16 Jul 2006 18:01:16 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:667420Community BlogsLooks like there is a bit of a distributed thread starting up around the dogfooding of VSTS at Microsoft