<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Google Chrome doesn't support Speech Recognition in Vista? IE and Firefox do... Hmmm...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/robch/archive/2008/09/16/google-chrome-doesn-t-support-speech-recognition-in-vista-ie-and-firefox-do-hmmm.aspx</link><description>I haven't tried it out personally, but over on the Habitually Good blog, Vaibhav says that Google's new Chrome browser doesn't work with Windows Speech Recognition in Windows Vista. That's too bad... Both IE7, IE8 Beta 2, and Firefox work great with it.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Google Chrome doesn't support Speech Recognition in Vista? IE and Firefox do... Hmmm...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/robch/archive/2008/09/16/google-chrome-doesn-t-support-speech-recognition-in-vista-ie-and-firefox-do-hmmm.aspx#8954521</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:04:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8954521</guid><dc:creator>rodtrent</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't speech the least of Google's worries about Chrome?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Abandoning Chrome until it supports WSR</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/robch/archive/2008/09/16/google-chrome-doesn-t-support-speech-recognition-in-vista-ie-and-firefox-do-hmmm.aspx#9547029</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:15:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9547029</guid><dc:creator>rwandering.net</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I use speech recognition a great deal – and I recently switched to Windows Speech Recognition on Vista.&amp;amp;#160; And I’ve been using Chrome exclusively for Google Apps, because I think it offers superior performance for JavaScript apps.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately,..&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>