<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Have Data Will Travel</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/default.aspx</link><description>&lt;script type="text/javascript" src="http://embed.technorati.com/embed/qry79a5nm.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>MDM - Scaling Out Matching</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2009/02/23/mdm-scaling-out-matching.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9441500</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/9441500.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9441500</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9441500</wfw:comment><description>MDM - Scaling Out Matching It’s been a long time since my last post but I’ve been pretty busy figuring out how IT works. As you might expect, one of the hardest things has been learning all the new acronyms. Not only that but some of the acronyms I thought...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2009/02/23/mdm-scaling-out-matching.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9441500" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Changes</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2008/08/29/changes.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8905957</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/8905957.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8905957</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8905957</wfw:comment><description>Changes This isn’t one of my more typical technical posts so if you’re looking for profound technical insights you can skip the rest of this. This summer I went through a career change that will probably impact what I blog about so I thought I should...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2008/08/29/changes.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8905957" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Master Data Management White Paper Series</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2008/07/19/new-master-data-management-white-paper-series.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 04:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8757053</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/8757053.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8757053</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8757053</wfw:comment><description>New Master Data Management White Paper Series My friend Tyler Graham is writing a series of white papers on the practical aspects of implementing an MDM system. The first three are available here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc505992(TechNet.10).aspx...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2008/07/19/new-master-data-management-white-paper-series.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8757053" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Choosing MDM Hub styles</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2008/05/27/choosing-mdm-hub-styles.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8555589</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/8555589.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8555589</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8555589</wfw:comment><description>Choosing MDM Hub styles A couple weeks ago, someone asked me how to choose which MDM hub style would work best for an application. I thought I had covered this in one of my white papers but I couldn’t find a good reference to give him so I thought I would...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2008/05/27/choosing-mdm-hub-styles.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8555589" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Post Mortems</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2008/02/01/post-mortems.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7379164</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/7379164.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=7379164</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7379164</wfw:comment><description>One of my pet peeves is that after we ship something we normally have a Post Mortem meeting to discuss what we should learn from the experience. I'm not against the meeting. I think they're great and we learn a lot. Sometimes we even have pizza! What...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2008/02/01/post-mortems.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7379164" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Master Data is not Metadata</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2008/01/28/master-data-is-not-metadata.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7299866</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/7299866.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=7299866</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7299866</wfw:comment><description>Master Data is not Metadata I regularly get emails from people asking about the Microsoft Metadata story. While I assume that’s mainly confusion over the MDM acronym which could reasonably be interpreted as Metadata Management as well as Master Data Management,...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2008/01/28/master-data-is-not-metadata.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7299866" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Master Data Management Philosophy</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/11/19/master-data-management-philosophy.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6420911</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/6420911.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6420911</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=6420911</wfw:comment><description>Master Data Management Philosophy Last week I did a presentation that included a slide on my philosophy for MDM so I decided to expand that slide into a blog post. While this is my philosophy, I think it comes pretty close to the way the rest of the MDM...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/11/19/master-data-management-philosophy.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6420911" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Microsoft MDM Web Site</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/09/24/new-microsoft-mdm-web-site.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5099772</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/5099772.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5099772</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5099772</wfw:comment><description>Check out the new Microsoft MDM web site: http://www.microsoft.com/sharepoint/mdm/default.mspx...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/09/24/new-microsoft-mdm-web-site.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5099772" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Gartner MDM Conference</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/09/24/gartner-mdm-conference.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5099732</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/5099732.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5099732</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5099732</wfw:comment><description>Gartner MDM Conference I just got back from the Gartner MDM Conference. I learned a lot and had the chance to talk to a lot of people about MDM and what they are doing in their organizations. Maybe it was because of the sample I happened to talk to but...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/09/24/gartner-mdm-conference.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5099732" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Analytical and Transactional MDM</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/07/26/analytical-and-transactional-mdm.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4075146</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/4075146.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4075146</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=4075146</wfw:comment><description>Analytical and Transactional MDM I was talking to someone about Analytical and Transactional MDM recently and we realized that while there are quite a few conceptual differences between the two, there’s a significant amount of overlap in the implementation...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/07/26/analytical-and-transactional-mdm.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4075146" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Stratature Misinformation</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/06/27/stratature-misinformation.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3572100</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/3572100.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3572100</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3572100</wfw:comment><description>Stratature Misinformation Do you remember the “telephone” game we used to play in school where you line a bunch of people up in a row and whisper something to the first person in line who whispers it to the next one, etc. and the last person repeats what...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/06/27/stratature-misinformation.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3572100" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Master Data Management, Microsoft, and Stratature</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/06/11/master-data-management-microsoft-and-stratature.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3236843</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/3236843.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3236843</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3236843</wfw:comment><description>Master Data Management, Microsoft, and Stratature If you’re a regular reader, you are aware that I have been blogging about MDM for about a year now. I’m very excited by the news that Microsoft acquired Stratature last week for two reasons – I think it’s...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/06/11/master-data-management-microsoft-and-stratature.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3236843" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Master Data Management at TechEd</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/05/24/master-data-management-at-teched.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 00:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2851316</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/2851316.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2851316</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=2851316</wfw:comment><description>Master Data Management at TechEd I notice that no MDM sessions made it into the TechEd schedule this year. If you’re a regular reader, you know that MDM is my current passion. If you’re interested in MDM, I would love to talk to you at the Architecture...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/05/24/master-data-management-at-teched.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2851316" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Windows WF on SQL Service Broker</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/05/21/windows-wf-on-sql-service-broker.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 17:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2768359</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/2768359.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2768359</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=2768359</wfw:comment><description>Windows WF on SQL Service Broker From the time we first started working on the Service Broker programming models five or six years ago, it was obvious that most SSB programs end up looking a lot like a workflow. Messages come in and the application processes...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/05/21/windows-wf-on-sql-service-broker.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2768359" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>MDM Hub Architecture White Paper</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/04/16/mdm-hub-architecture-white-paper.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2153963</guid><dc:creator>Roger.Wolter</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/comments/2153963.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2153963</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=2153963</wfw:comment><description>MDM Hub Architecture White Paper I took my MDM Hub Architecture series of posts, cleaned them up and combined them into a white paper that was just published on MSDN: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/architecture/bb410798.aspx...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rogerwolterblog/archive/2007/04/16/mdm-hub-architecture-white-paper.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2153963" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>