Comparing the WF Rules Engine to the BizTalk Business Rules Engine

re: Comparing the WF Rules Engine to the BizTalk Business Rules Engine

jamet123 — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:22:28 GMT

Here's a post I wrote some time ago on a related topic - http://www.edmblog.com/weblog/2005/11/biztalk_windows.html

Enjoy

re: Comparing the WF Rules Engine to the BizTalk Business Rules Engine

tr0ublemak3r — Sat, 24 Mar 2007 03:20:51 GMT

There are several major errors in the powerpoint on how RETE works. I would suggest you get in touch with Charles Young a MVP to get a better understanding http://geekswithblogs.net/cyoung/.

Getting a thorough and solid understanding of how RETE works takes years, so I understand why the powerpoint makes wrong assumptions. WF engines are useful and provide benefits in specific cases, but many of the explanations in the powerpoint are wrong for other RETE engines. It may be correct for MS BRE, but I can't say for sure. Charles young would be able to provide a better explanation. I've posted a critique on my blog http://woolfel.blogspot.com/2007/03/windows-wf-group-doesnt-understand-rete.html.

the blog is private. if you want an invite, email me at woolfel AT gmail DOT com.

re: Comparing the WF Rules Engine to the BizTalk Business Rules Engine

kavitak — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 04:48:30 GMT

Hi Woolfel, Thanks for your comment. This presentation was done by a Microsoft Consultant to a bunch of customers using WF Rules and BizTalk BRE. It is not intended as a general RETE reference. RETE implementations differ from each other - and this wasnt an attempt to explain the RETE algorithm, just what we have. If you'd like to contact me more to discuss, please email me at kavita.kamani at microsoft dot com.

Thanks,

Kavita

Comparing Windows Workflow Foundation (WF) Rules with BizTalk Server 2006 Business Rules Engine

Naveed's Blog — Tue, 29 May 2007 20:34:09 GMT

Introduction Since the arrival of .NET 3.0, there are now two (2) business rules related technologies