<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>64-bit SQL &amp; Windows 2003 Server</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rwlodarc/archive/2003/04/24/6006.aspx</link><description>Ok, this is just insane and amazing at the same time! Way to go 64-bit SQL Server on Windows 2003 Server!! Oracle and IBM have a tough fight ahead of them if they wish to stay competetive in the databases market...</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: 64-bit SQL &amp; Windows 2003 Server</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rwlodarc/archive/2003/04/24/6006.aspx#132878</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2004 21:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:132878</guid><dc:creator>stefan demetz</dc:creator><description>SQL Server scalability (64 bit) &lt;br&gt;&lt;a target="_new" href="http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/stefandemetz/archive/2004/05/16/13724.aspx"&gt;http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/stefandemetz/archive/2004/05/16/13724.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>