<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>So you wrote a WIC enabled CODEC... Does it work?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rwlodarc/archive/2006/10/27/so-you-wrote-a-wic-enabled-codec-does-it-work.aspx</link><description>After reading this blog, Peggi's whitepaper , and the MSDN Documentation , you decided to write a CODEC for an image file type. The CODEC was even tested in WICExplorer . Great! Now you hope that the CODEC is fully functional... meaning that you can use</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>App Verifier &amp; WICGrinder</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rwlodarc/archive/2006/10/27/so-you-wrote-a-wic-enabled-codec-does-it-work.aspx#943112</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:48:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:943112</guid><dc:creator>Robert A. Wlodarczyk's Blog (MSFT)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In the previous post about WICGrinder , this tool for verifying WIC CODEC behavior was introduced. As&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>WICGrinder Updated</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/rwlodarc/archive/2006/10/27/so-you-wrote-a-wic-enabled-codec-does-it-work.aspx#1041252</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 02:04:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1041252</guid><dc:creator>Robert A. Wlodarczyk's Blog (MSFT)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;After the initial release of WICGrinder almost 2 weeks ago, we have added metadata tests in. Also, we&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>