<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SQL, .NET and everything Microsoft : SQL Best Practices</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Best+Practices/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: SQL Best Practices</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Performance Impact of querying SQL Server 2005 DMVs and implementing Page Checksum</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/2007/03/31/performance-impact-of-querying-sql-server-2005-dmvs-and-implementing-page-checksum.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2000730</guid><dc:creator>Sanchan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/comments/2000730.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2000730</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=2000730</wfw:comment><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;Many of you have asked me the performance impact of:&lt;?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-bidi-font-family: Verdana; mso-fareast-font-family: Verdana"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="mso-list: Ignore"&gt;a)&lt;SPAN style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;Running a default profiler trace&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-bidi-font-family: Verdana; mso-fareast-font-family: Verdana"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="mso-list: Ignore"&gt;b)&lt;SPAN style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;Enabling page checksum&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;Although there is only theoretical information available in BOL, Linchi Shea (SQL Server MPV) has some good posts on empirical analysis on these features.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;Recommended that you read them!&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;Performance Impact of Enabling Page Checksum and Default Trace&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"&gt;&lt;A href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2007/01/16/performance-impact-of-enabling-page-checksum-and-default-trace.aspx"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="COLOR: windowtext"&gt;http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2007/01/16/performance-impact-of-enabling-page-checksum-and-default-trace.aspx&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"&gt;Performance Impact of Querying SQL Server 2005 Scheduler-Related DMV's&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"&gt;&lt;A href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2007/01/18/performance-impact-of-querying-sql-server-2005-scheduler-related-dmv-s.aspx"&gt;&lt;FONT color=#800080&gt;http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2007/01/18/performance-impact-of-querying-sql-server-2005-scheduler-related-dmv-s.aspx&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"&gt;Happy reading.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"&gt;Sanchan&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2000730" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Best+Practices/default.aspx">SQL Best Practices</category></item><item><title>Installing SQL 2005 and SQL 2000 on the same box - what you should know?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/2006/08/18/706647.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:706647</guid><dc:creator>Sanchan</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/comments/706647.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/commentrss.aspx?PostID=706647</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=706647</wfw:comment><description>Many customers have asked me if they can install SQL 2000 and SQL 2005 on the same box, side by side. The answer to this is YES. You can install SQL 2000, SQL 7.0 and SQL 2005 on the same box. However, there are certain special considerations that you...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/2006/08/18/706647.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=706647" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Tips+and+Tricks/default.aspx">SQL Tips and Tricks</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+-+Setup+and+Upgrade/default.aspx">SQL - Setup and Upgrade</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Best+Practices/default.aspx">SQL Best Practices</category></item><item><title>FAQs - SQL Server and Disk Subsystem requirements</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/2006/07/07/659269.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:659269</guid><dc:creator>Sanchan</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/comments/659269.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/commentrss.aspx?PostID=659269</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=659269</wfw:comment><description>This is the first installment in my FAQ series. In this blog entry, I have consolidated all the questions that I have received from my readers about available disk subsystems in the market and their compatibility with SQL Server. I have tried to address...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/2006/07/07/659269.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=659269" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Tips+and+Tricks/default.aspx">SQL Tips and Tricks</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Best+Practices/default.aspx">SQL Best Practices</category></item><item><title>Working with TempDb in SQL 2005</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/2006/06/29/651462.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 02:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:651462</guid><dc:creator>Sanchan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/comments/651462.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/commentrss.aspx?PostID=651462</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=651462</wfw:comment><description>Just a quick note, Microsoft has published a great whitepaper on TempDB. You can download it here: http://download.microsoft.com/download/4/f/8/4f8f2dc9-a9a7-4b68-98cb-163482c95e0b/WorkingWithTempDB.doc I will add more blog content about TempDb soon....(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/2006/06/29/651462.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=651462" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Tips+and+Tricks/default.aspx">SQL Tips and Tricks</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Best+Practices/default.aspx">SQL Best Practices</category></item><item><title>SETUP - SQL 2005 and domain groups best practices</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/2006/06/14/630420.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:630420</guid><dc:creator>Sanchan</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/comments/630420.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/commentrss.aspx?PostID=630420</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=630420</wfw:comment><description>Unlike SQL 2000, SQL 2005 setup on a cluster now requires you to provide domain groups for each clustered service – like SQL Database Engine, SQL Agent, FTS, Analysis Services. Many customers have asked me interesting questions about domain groups and...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/2006/06/14/630420.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=630420" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Tips+and+Tricks/default.aspx">SQL Tips and Tricks</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+-+Setup+and+Upgrade/default.aspx">SQL - Setup and Upgrade</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Best+Practices/default.aspx">SQL Best Practices</category></item><item><title>Add/Remove Program and SQL 2005</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/2006/06/13/630389.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 06:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:630389</guid><dc:creator>Sanchan</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/comments/630389.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/commentrss.aspx?PostID=630389</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=630389</wfw:comment><description>When you install SQL Server 2005, depending upon the components you installed, you will see a couple of entries in the Add/Remove programs related to SQL Server 2005. The most important one is Microsoft SQL Server 2005. This entry provides you with a...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/2006/06/13/630389.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=630389" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Tips+and+Tricks/default.aspx">SQL Tips and Tricks</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+-+Setup+and+Upgrade/default.aspx">SQL - Setup and Upgrade</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Best+Practices/default.aspx">SQL Best Practices</category></item><item><title>SQL Server 2005 and compressed drives - what you should know?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/2006/06/04/617585.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 06:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:617585</guid><dc:creator>Sanchan</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/comments/617585.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/commentrss.aspx?PostID=617585</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=617585</wfw:comment><description>You will be surprised to know how many times this topic comes up during discussions with SQL Server DBAs. I guess the reason for confusion or discussion primarily emanates from the fact that the documentation on this topic hasn’t been that detailed. So...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/2006/06/04/617585.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=617585" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Tips+and+Tricks/default.aspx">SQL Tips and Tricks</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/sanchan/archive/tags/SQL+Best+Practices/default.aspx">SQL Best Practices</category></item></channel></rss>