Scott Woodgate's OutBursts

BizTalk Server 2004 MVPs

We are searching for five elite BizTalk Server experts to nominate as our MVPs.  Do you have what it takes to be an MVP? To be a BizTalk Server 2004 MVP we are looking for folks who will:

1. Post regularly to the newsgroups answering questions on BizTalk Server 2004.

2. Write a whitepaper a year OR write two samples a year on BizTalk Server 2004 and upload them to gotdotnet.com.

So what do you get out of the deal? Well its a pretty amazing deal.  You get:

    • A cool (MVP) in your name when posting to newsgroups
    • Recognition as an industry expert on BizTalk Server
    • MVP logo and certificates
    • MSDN universal subscription OR TechNet Plus subscription
    • An Invitation to MVP Summit
    • Private MVP Web Sites and newsgroups
    • And a whole bunch of other stuff :)

Do you have lots of experience with integration or BizTalk Server 2004 then go ahead and apply. Please include your experience and suggestions for samples/whitepapers etc.

Send your applications to: jfort at microsoft dot com

Deadline for submission: December 15th.

Cheers,

Scott.

Published Tuesday, December 02, 2003 4:04 PM by scottwoo

Comments

 

Mieke said:

Scott, I would strongly like to suggest that we can select Christof Claessens from Belgium (SD Worx) for this. I am convinced that he fulfills all your requests. Please inform me your thoughts?
December 4, 2003 2:48 AM
 

sbradley SBS MVP said:

http://netscan.research.microsoft.com/reportcard.asp?timespan=m&searchdate=10/31/2003&NGID=145804&searchfor=microsoft.public.biztalk.general Why not do a netscan search and find your newsgroup posters?
December 4, 2003 4:01 PM
 

Robert Rijsdijk said:

Hi Scott ,

I know the MVP selection is closed but I wanna ask if there is one free. My name is Robert Rijsdijk I work for LogicaCMG in the Netherlands. Ive got 3.5 years experience with BizTalk. Also with Accelerators such as Covast EDI Accelerator for BizTalk Server.
We are working together with Microsoft in the Netherlands. Our company has a agreement Preferred Integration Partner of Microsoft The Netherlands.
I give trainings/presentations in the Netherlands to promote BizTalk 2004 together with Microsoft.
My collegeas are busy with a BizTalk 2004 Pilot for the goverment in the Netherlands.
Examples for Samples :
- Splitting op Messages (through orchestration)
- ZIP files by a Receive Pipeline and transport to a Orchestration and transport them to a specific Business Partner.
etc.

Best regards ,
Robert Rijsdijk.
Email: robert.rijsdijK@logicacmg.com
Rotterdam
The Netherlands

Microsoft contact person : Marcel Fernee.
February 4, 2004 8:32 AM
 

hung said:

Hi everybody,


Do you know about default pass thru transmit pipeline and xml transmit pipeline (both of these are for sending).
That is the difference?
Some example I work on only work on one pipeline, not the other.
Same question for default pass thru receive and xml receive pipeline (both of these are for receiving).
What is the difference? What is the reason to pick one over other in some situation?

I also have problem with MSMQT (serialization problem).
I can not get message MSMQ (regular queue) from remote machine to work with MSMQT from a local biztalk machine.
I can work with them individually, but when they have to send/receive from each other, the serialization format got stuck (I tried every from custom serialization to etc..)

Basically, I don’t want MSMQ and MSMQT any more, I will use SQL adapter with biztalk 2004.
My main question here (this question has been asked before by others on some forum but biztalk 2004 is so now, no answer yet):
I want to save the whole message (XML message from a file receive function).
The XML message should be able to save as a whole string inside some SQL server table.
I came a cross some example but only field by field example.
I need to whole message as a string to work with SQL Adapter for Biztalk.
Any recommendation?
Thanks,
Hung
March 30, 2004 3:42 PM
 

hung said:

I know that xlang schedule 2004 needs some account to run under.
I use a domain account that has admin right to the domain.
Now, I have an orchestration in biztalk 2004 calling some web service.
If I use anonymous authentication for the web service virtual directory, the orchestration works fine.

If I use windows authentication (that should authentication the admin account I run Xlang under), the orchestration failed!!! The event logs said the error is due to the web service virtual directory permission.

Do you know why? Logically, my set up should work, but it does not.

Thanks,
Hung
April 13, 2004 5:13 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled

This Blog

Syndication

Tags

No tags have been created or used yet.

© 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use  |  Trademarks  |  Privacy Statement
Microsoft
Page view tracker