Scott Woodgate's OutBursts

One more thing, nominations for future web-casts

Thanks for all the feedback that these were useful.  What topics would you like to see covered that we didn't cover this time around. Please add your comments below.
Published Tuesday, March 09, 2004 12:13 PM by scottwoo

Comments

 

Steve Kister said:

A WebCast detailing a high availability architecture would be very beneficial. Specifically how to build a high available BizTalk 2004 architecture not only to avoid system failures but also in terms of code deployment. In other words, how do we design and then deploy code without causing a system outage.

thanks,
steve
March 9, 2004 1:17 PM
 

Jim Martin said:

Kind of basic, but I would like to see examples of XML or Flat File to SQL examples/web casts
March 9, 2004 2:11 PM
 

Eric Shim said:

What about HWS? It is a new feature.
March 9, 2004 2:34 PM
 

Randy Miller said:

I cast a second vote for HWS and possibly one on Business Activity Services in an intranet environment. Is there going a "web" version of HAT?
March 9, 2004 4:00 PM
 

Ravi Vuppaladadiyam said:

Hi Scott

Can we have a webcast about using SQL Adapter? How about one more webcast using Adapter Framework?

Thanks
Ravi
March 9, 2004 4:13 PM
 

Mike Holdorf said:

I would like to see more on advanced Orchestration including Transactions and Error Handling.
March 9, 2004 7:43 PM
 

Theo de Klerk said:

Another YES for HWS. This topic remains rather dark and poorly documented.
March 10, 2004 12:09 AM
 

Danny Buysse said:

Like to see especially some advanced ones:
Advanced Editor and Mapper (a lot of properties available but not always clear what they do)
Advanced Orchestration (already mentioned transaction...)
Advanced Pipeline creation (pipelines itself - liek envelopes - but also custom pipeline components)


Demos like in the Web services Webcast are really great. Thanks for posting them.

CU in Belgium!
March 10, 2004 3:29 AM
 

Cristian Sobral said:

A webcast about HWS should be very usefull as there's not enough documentation.

Thanks
March 10, 2004 5:11 AM
 

Joep Wijers said:

I would like to see details on developing custom adapters, although I'd rather read about it than view a webcast. This topic was documented quiet rough in the beta version, and now it is gone. Does it still work the same? If not, how can I create an adapter without any info? If it is the same, can I look into these old documents again somewhere?
March 10, 2004 5:45 AM
 

Colin Lee said:

Just to echo a little:

HWS
Designing BizTalk Architecture
Custom Adapters
Advanced Orchestration
March 10, 2004 7:18 AM
 

Jeff said:

another vote for HWS
March 10, 2004 7:58 AM
 

Stan said:

For sure -- HWS
This drum is getting a little worn..

Excellent content in the presentations overall!

Thanks
March 10, 2004 8:58 AM
 

Kerry said:

I'd like more details on convoy orchestrations. Specifially how to handle change requests or cancel requests for an orchestration that is already in process and long running. Thank you much! Loved all the webcasts last week.
March 10, 2004 9:40 AM
 

Matt Meleski said:

-A Web Cast covering EDI documents.
-How the Biztalk Base EDI service fits into
the picture.
-Limitations/ Advancements of EDI (Compared to Biztalk 2002)
March 10, 2004 5:51 PM
 

Deepak said:

Excellent presentations! Also I would like to request the following in future

1. Migration of existing Biztalk 2000/2002 projects to Biztalk 2004

2. Business Activity Monitoring

3. HWS

4. EDI

Thanks!
March 11, 2004 5:37 AM
 

Demetrion "Dee" Ware said:

Please do something on EDI.
There is not real documentation in the product.
Its hard for us to sell companies on this without a clear understanding of how this process works now.
March 11, 2004 10:42 AM
 

EDI said:

EDI
March 11, 2004 10:43 AM
 

Panchy said:

Did anyone mention HWS? :-)
March 12, 2004 3:08 AM
 

Thomas Pressl said:

First, thank you for your great presentation you've done so far!
I would like to request the following:

1.) HWS ;-)
2.) Advanced BAM/BAS (including custom Web Parts/Office Web Components)
3.) Visio -> Orchestration (and vice versa)
4.) Generic patterns
March 22, 2004 5:13 AM
 

Jamie said:

EDI
HWS
Custom Adapters
Using the scripting functoid in the Mapper effectively (eg. .NET code and XSLT)

Either document the functionality properly or do a presentation.

While the presentations were very useful, I cannot recommend an upgrade to my company yet as there is not enough good information on some of these features.
March 22, 2004 4:27 PM
 

Harish Pavithran said:

I would like to see a web cast on DTA, WMI api and BizTalk .NET programmer reference examples - how do I use these apis and when?

Also I would like to see a web cast on cross referencing and some perhaps more examples in the SDK around this.
March 25, 2004 11:37 AM
 

hung said:

Hi everybody,


Do you know about default pass thru transmit pipeline and xml transmit pipeline (both of these are for sending).
That is the difference?
Some example I work on only work on one pipeline, not the other.
Same question for default pass thru receive and xml receive pipeline (both of these are for receiving).
What is the difference? What is the reason to pick one over other in some situation?

I also have problem with MSMQT (serialization problem).
I can not get message MSMQ (regular queue) from remote machine to work with MSMQT from a local biztalk machine.
I can work with them individually, but when they have to send/receive from each other, the serialization format got stuck (I tried every from custom serialization to etc..)

Basically, I don’t want MSMQ and MSMQT any more, I will use SQL adapter with biztalk 2004.
My main question here (this question has been asked before by others on some forum but biztalk 2004 is so now, no answer yet):
I want to save the whole message (XML message from a file receive function).
The XML message should be able to save as a whole string inside some SQL server table.
I came a cross some example but only field by field example.
I need to whole message as a string to work with SQL Adapter for Biztalk.
Any recommendation?
Thanks,
Hung
March 30, 2004 3:36 PM
 

Montaque said:

EDI and ITS Extension in biztalk
June 25, 2004 7:48 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled

© 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use  |  Trademarks  |  Privacy Statement
Microsoft
Page view tracker