<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Reliability Vs. Security</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sdl/archive/2007/12/07/reliability-vs-security.aspx</link><description>James Whittaker here. At the International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE 07, Trollhattan Sweden) one would think that the security versus reliability debate would be very one-sided. After all, reliability is the attendees’ mainstay</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Reliability Vs. Security</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sdl/archive/2007/12/07/reliability-vs-security.aspx#6796968</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:49:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6796968</guid><dc:creator>LyalinDotCom</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;One common factor that links both of these fields is the usual lack of appreciation for such efforts by most organizations. As we all know features rule while Security and reliability tend to be downgraded unless the specific industry has core business reasons to consider them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the end of the day if you do it right, no one will know you did anything at all.&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>