<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Recent Symantec and IBM vulnerabilities, giblets, banned APIs and the SDL</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sdl/archive/2008/01/04/recent-symantec-and-ibm-vulnerabilities-giblets-banned-apis-and-the-sdl.aspx</link><description>Hi, Michael here. Happy New Year! Recently, Symantec issued a security advisory warning users of critical remote code-execution security vulnerabilities in various Symantec email security products. The bugs caught my eye for a number of reasons: First</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Recent Symantec and IBM vulnerabilities, giblets, banned APIs and the SDL</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sdl/archive/2008/01/04/recent-symantec-and-ibm-vulnerabilities-giblets-banned-apis-and-the-sdl.aspx#6984489</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:53:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6984489</guid><dc:creator>Michael Howard's Web Log</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I just posted some commentary on the SDL blog about some recent Symantec and IBM vulnerabilities, and&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Recent Symantec and IBM vulnerabilities, giblets, banned APIs and the SDL</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sdl/archive/2008/01/04/recent-symantec-and-ibm-vulnerabilities-giblets-banned-apis-and-the-sdl.aspx#6984613</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:17:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6984613</guid><dc:creator>Noticias externas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I just posted some commentary on the SDL blog about some recent Symantec and IBM vulnerabilities, and&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>The Trouble with Giblets</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sdl/archive/2008/01/04/recent-symantec-and-ibm-vulnerabilities-giblets-banned-apis-and-the-sdl.aspx#8101475</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:28:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8101475</guid><dc:creator>Larry Osterman's WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't write about the SDL very much, because I figure that the SDL team does a good enough job of it&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>The Other Side of Life</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sdl/archive/2008/01/04/recent-symantec-and-ibm-vulnerabilities-giblets-banned-apis-and-the-sdl.aspx#8329488</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:07:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8329488</guid><dc:creator>The Security Development Lifecycle</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello everyone, Shawn Hernan here. I used to work on the SDL team, and I might have been a regular contributor&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>