More trustworthy election systems via SDL?

Election » Blog Archive » More trustworthy election systems via SDL?

Election » Blog Archive » More trustworthy election systems via SDL? — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:44:10 GMT

PingBack from http://election-blogs.info/?p=45792

re: More trustworthy election systems via SDL?

NickMalik — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:51:00 GMT

terrific post! Your analysis is very thoughtful.

And a little bit frightening.

More trustworthy election systems via SDL?

Michael Howard's Web Log — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:04:50 GMT

My colleague Eric Bidstrup has just posted a thought provoking article on the SDL blog about elections

re: More trustworthy election systems via SDL?

Gairald Zeiler Jr. — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:38:27 GMT

The statistical conclusion in the opening paragraph gave me much to chew op, though a small piece.

The presentation of security problems hints at a new governmental department to oversee standards of security. All retired politcos and of course appointed for their grasp of the subject.

Thank you for your thoughts. GZ

Varmistaako turvallinen ohjelmistokehitysprosessi äänestysjärjestelmän?

avs Online — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:19:51 GMT

Microsoftin turvallisen ohjelmistokehityksen blogissa kirjoitetaan sähköäänestyskoneiden tietoturvallisuudesta ja turvallisten ohjelmistokehitysprosessien suhteesta niihin.

Ohjelmistokehitysprosessien turvallisuuden lisäämistä varten on luotu usei

15 Most Influential Security People

David LeBlanc's Web Log — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:13:03 GMT

This isn't exactly the list I would have drawn up, and I must be having a bad year, since I'm not on

15 Most Influential Security People

Noticias externas — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:14:43 GMT

This isn't exactly the list I would have drawn up, and I must be having a bad year, since I'm

Voting For Transparent Communication

The Security Development Lifecycle — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:05:13 GMT

Adam Shostack here. We think of the SDL as a cradle-to-grave process, where we build security into the