<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SDL and the CWE/SANS Top 25</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sdl/archive/2009/01/27/sdl-and-the-cwe-sans-top-25.aspx</link><description>Bryan here. The security community has been buzzing since SANS and MITRE’s joint announcement earlier this month of their list of the Top 25 Most Dangerous Programming Errors . Now, I don’t want to get into a debate in this blog about whether this new</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Failure to Preserve SQL Query Structure (aka 'SQL Injection')</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sdl/archive/2009/01/27/sdl-and-the-cwe-sans-top-25.aspx#9413306</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:00:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9413306</guid><dc:creator>Wampiryczny blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;CWE-89: Failure to Preserve SQL Query Structure (aka 'SQL Injection') pochodzi wprost z 2009 CWE/SANS Top 25 Most Dangerous Programming Errors. Osobiście bardzo się cieszę z opublikowania tego typu dokumentu, zalecenia w nim zawarte można wprost wyko&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>