<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/atom.xsl" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US"><title type="html">Services for UNIX - Interoperability</title><subtitle type="html">A blog on Services for UNIX and UNIX Interoperability components in Windows by Ashish</subtitle><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/atom.xml</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/default.aspx" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/atom.xml" /><generator uri="http://communityserver.org" version="2.1.61025.2">Community Server</generator><updated>2007-07-11T15:05:00Z</updated><entry><title>Using DFS for Centralized Access to Multiple NFS Servers</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/09/11/using-dfs-for-centralized-access-to-multiple-nfs-servers.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/09/11/using-dfs-for-centralized-access-to-multiple-nfs-servers.aspx</id><published>2009-09-11T22:28:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-11T22:28:00Z</updated><content type="html">Using DFS for Centralized Access to Multiple NFS Servers Lately, we have seen customers who are trying to utilize DFS to publish NFS shares from a single DFS server to centralize the access for the clients. This has several benefits. It removes the problem of keeping a note of what NFS server is hosting a given NFS share and also the need to mount them. While you can still map a DFS link to a drive letter, I think it would be easier to browse to the DFS server using UNC and use the shares. So, the...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/09/11/using-dfs-for-centralized-access-to-multiple-nfs-servers.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9894357" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="SFU" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/SFU/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 R2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+R2/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Vista" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Vista/default.aspx" /><category term="Client for NFS" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Client+for+NFS/default.aspx" /><category term="Services for UNIX" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Services+for+UNIX/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2008" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2008/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows 7" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+7/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2008 R2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2008+R2/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Getting AD Lookup to work without UNIX Attributes tab</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/07/16/getting-ad-lookup-to-work-without-unix-attributes-tab.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/07/16/getting-ad-lookup-to-work-without-unix-attributes-tab.aspx</id><published>2009-07-16T20:03:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-16T20:03:00Z</updated><content type="html">Getting AD Lookup to work without UNIX Attributes tab The previous post talks about how to get the UNIX Attributes tab to work without installing IdMU components. In this post, I would like to talk about what attributes the NFS components expect to be populated in AD for user and group object before it can recognize them and use the information. The UNIX Attributes tab populate a lot of other attributes because it is primarily designed to assist administrators to populate the attributes that are...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/07/16/getting-ad-lookup-to-work-without-unix-attributes-tab.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9835860" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="Server for NFS" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Server+for+NFS/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 R2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+R2/default.aspx" /><category term="Active Directory Lookup" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Active+Directory+Lookup/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2008" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2008/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2008 R2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2008+R2/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Using UNIX Attributes tab without installing IdMU</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/07/13/using-unix-attributes-tab-without-installing-idmu.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/07/13/using-unix-attributes-tab-without-installing-idmu.aspx</id><published>2009-07-13T22:11:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-13T22:11:00Z</updated><content type="html">Using UNIX Attributes tab without installing IdMU Starting with the Windows Server 2003 R2 release, Microsoft has made it clear that the AD Lookup feature would be the preferred direction to go for identity mapping between Windows and *nix when it comes to NFS access - both server and client. AD Lookup uses the information populated in UidNumber and GidNumber attributes with user and group objects in AD to map the identity information between these platforms. There's no tool that comes with NFS components...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/07/13/using-unix-attributes-tab-without-installing-idmu.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9832164" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="Windows Server 2003 R2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+R2/default.aspx" /><category term="Active Directory Lookup" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Active+Directory+Lookup/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Vista" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Vista/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2008" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2008/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows 7" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+7/default.aspx" /><category term="Server for NIS" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Server+for+NIS/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2008 R2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2008+R2/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>AD Lookup with ADAM/ADLDS</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/07/10/ad-lookup-with-adam-adlds.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/07/10/ad-lookup-with-adam-adlds.aspx</id><published>2009-07-11T01:17:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-11T01:17:00Z</updated><content type="html">AD Lookup with ADAM/ADLDS With removal of UNM in Vista/W2K8, it became really problematic to map users in non-AD environments to use with Vista/LH NFS Servers and Clients. For client, a workaround was discovered which was essentially a registry tweak and did allow more than user to be able to access the resources. Now, a guide exists that details the steps to install and configure ADLDS (Active Directory Lightweight Directory Services) and to use it with NFS for UNIX identity information source....(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/07/10/ad-lookup-with-adam-adlds.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9829137" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="Server for NFS" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Server+for+NFS/default.aspx" /><category term="Active Directory Lookup" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Active+Directory+Lookup/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Vista" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Vista/default.aspx" /><category term="Client for NFS" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Client+for+NFS/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2008" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2008/default.aspx" /><category term="ADAM" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/ADAM/default.aspx" /><category term="ADLDS" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/ADLDS/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Removal of technology: Services for Macintosh (SFM)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/06/24/removal-of-technology-services-for-macintosh-sfm.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/06/24/removal-of-technology-services-for-macintosh-sfm.aspx</id><published>2009-06-24T22:22:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-24T22:22:00Z</updated><content type="html">Removal of technology: Services for Macintosh (SFM) This seems a little strange and SFM is being talked about on this blog. Well, SFM is one of the technologies that we support along with UNIX Interoperability components like NFS, NIS and SUA. Anyways, this is not news and people who have used SFM would have noticed by now that SFM is not part of Windows Server 2008 and later releases. This technology has been in the maintenance mode since long and didn't change much since the Windows NT 4.0 days....(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/06/24/removal-of-technology-services-for-macintosh-sfm.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9801923" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="Windows Server 2008" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2008/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows 7" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+7/default.aspx" /><category term="SFM" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/SFM/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Windows 7 SUA SDK</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/06/24/windows-7-sua-sdk.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/06/24/windows-7-sua-sdk.aspx</id><published>2009-06-24T21:51:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-24T21:51:00Z</updated><content type="html">Windows 7 SUA SDK A lot of people have been enquiring about the Windows 7 SUA SDK. There is a lot of anticipation since Windows 7 has already raised the bar on the other fronts and now people have high expectations for SUA SDK that would be released for Windows 7 SUA. The picture is not as good - there are no new features being added to SUA with Windows 7. You would not see any new ported utilities or libraries. It will be just the bug fixes that have been reported on previous SDK and not much. If...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/06/24/windows-7-sua-sdk.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9801906" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="Interix" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Interix/default.aspx" /><category term="SUA" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/SUA/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows 7" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+7/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Can I Set Up User Name Mapping in Windows Vista?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/03/27/can-i-set-up-user-name-mapping-in-windows-vista.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/03/27/can-i-set-up-user-name-mapping-in-windows-vista.aspx</id><published>2009-03-27T23:01:00Z</published><updated>2009-03-27T23:01:00Z</updated><content type="html">Can I Set Up User Name Mapping in Windows Vista? Unfortunately, no if you don't have a SFU 3.5 or W2K3 R2 machines on the network that is running User Name Mapping service. This has been a major disappointment with NFS deployments using Windows Vista. However, there is a tiny little good news for you if you are looking for a way to enable Client for NFS in Windows Vista to be able to do something other than anonymous mounts. There is a registry tweak that you can modify to tweak Vista NFS client...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/03/27/can-i-set-up-user-name-mapping-in-windows-vista.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9514962" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="Windows Vista" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Vista/default.aspx" /><category term="Client for NFS" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Client+for+NFS/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows 7" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+7/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>NFS and SUA in Windows 7</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/01/23/nfs-and-sua-in-windows-7.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/01/23/nfs-and-sua-in-windows-7.aspx</id><published>2009-01-23T22:48:00Z</published><updated>2009-01-23T22:48:00Z</updated><content type="html">NFS and SUA in Windows 7 Finally, the Windows 7 beta is released to the public and we can now experience it ourselves. The PSS people in Microsoft are always excited to try their hands on the latest betas and Windows 7 is not an exception. The first thing that we did, after exploring the new GUI experience, was to add Client for NFS and Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications (SUA) components. The addition is completely alike Windows Vista so no surprises here but it was much faster than Vista. The...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2009/01/23/nfs-and-sua-in-windows-7.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9373088" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="SUA" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/SUA/default.aspx" /><category term="Client for NFS" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Client+for+NFS/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows 7" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+7/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Limitation with Active Directory Lookup feature in Microsoft Services for NFS</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2008/12/15/limitation-with-active-directory-lookup-feature-in-microsoft-services-for-nfs.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2008/12/15/limitation-with-active-directory-lookup-feature-in-microsoft-services-for-nfs.aspx</id><published>2008-12-16T01:25:00Z</published><updated>2008-12-16T01:25:00Z</updated><content type="html">Limitation with Active Directory Lookup feature in Microsoft Services for NFS The Active Directory Lookup feature that was introduced with Windows Server 2003 R2. This feature greatly simplifies the UNIX identity information management but has its own set of limitation. I thoughy I'll document them here - 1. If you are using Client for NFS in conjunction with Active Directory lookup, the client will not send the secondary groups information of the user to the server. This is a limitation in the RFC2307...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2008/12/15/limitation-with-active-directory-lookup-feature-in-microsoft-services-for-nfs.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9222648" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="Server for NFS" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Server+for+NFS/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 R2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+R2/default.aspx" /><category term="Active Directory Lookup" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Active+Directory+Lookup/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Vista" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Vista/default.aspx" /><category term="Client for NFS" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Client+for+NFS/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2008" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2008/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Set up Services for Network File System in Windows Server 2008</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2008/12/15/set-up-services-for-network-file-system-in-windows-server-2008.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2008/12/15/set-up-services-for-network-file-system-in-windows-server-2008.aspx</id><published>2008-12-16T01:03:00Z</published><updated>2008-12-16T01:03:00Z</updated><content type="html">Set up Services for Network File System in Windows Server 2008 The Microsoft Services for NFS continues to be the part of the operating system in Windows Server 2008 and seems we will see more improvements when Windows Server 2008 R2 is released. In Windows Server 2008, a major change from the Windows Server 2003 R2 is the elimination of User Name Mapping service. Although, you can still use an existing UNM server to fetch the UNIX Identity information on a Windows Server 2008 system, it doesn't...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2008/12/15/set-up-services-for-network-file-system-in-windows-server-2008.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9222624" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="Server for NFS" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Server+for+NFS/default.aspx" /><category term="Active Directory Lookup" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Active+Directory+Lookup/default.aspx" /><category term="Client for NFS" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Client+for+NFS/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2008" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2008/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>All (well, almost) about Client for NFS - Configuration and Performance</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2008/04/14/all-well-almost-about-client-for-nfs-configuration-and-performance.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2008/04/14/all-well-almost-about-client-for-nfs-configuration-and-performance.aspx</id><published>2008-04-14T08:42:00Z</published><updated>2008-04-14T08:42:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;All (well, almost) about Client for NFS - Configuration and Performance &lt;/FONT&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;I was looking at the referrals this blog gets and I noticed that a lot of times people look for information on Client for NFS in Services for UNIX, Windows Server 2003 R2 or in Windows Vista and come to this blog, but I don't really have much useful information on installation, configuration and performance on Client for NFS. Now, that will not be the case.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;I have received requests to put together something about Client for NFS since there doesn't seem to be a detailed single document which talks about it. There are KB articles which cover installation and configuration of Client for NFS. There are also some of them about issues and registry settings to help optimize the settings for CNFS.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Since it has also been a long time I have spent time on this blog, I guess it's high time I talk about Client for NFS and add some value to my blog.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Client for NFS is a very important offering from Microsoft for small and big enterprises to integrate their Windows systems with existing UNIX based environment. It now comes with RFC2307 support as well. It's one of the most simple component among Services for UNIX components. Client for NFS doesn't really ask for any configuration/restarts in most of the installations and offers true out-of-the-box NFS connectivity. You can see in the following screen shot how Client for NFS can be added/removed if Services for UNIX software is already installed -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409027/425x326.aspx" mce_src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409027/425x326.aspx"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;In Windows Server 2003 R2, you can find CNFS listed in "Microsoft Services for NFS" under "Other File and Print Services" -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409029/500x223.aspx" mce_src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409029/500x223.aspx"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;And, on a Windows Vista Enterprise/Ultimate systems, here's how you can add it -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409030/original.aspx" mce_src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409030/original.aspx"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Once you have installed Client for NFS, you are ready to start connecting to UNIX NFS shares where anonymous access is allowed. If your environment doesn't have any such shares to test connectivity, you now need to configure this system to fetch UNIX identity information from an existing User Name Mapping server or configure one if it is not already running.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;See &lt;A class="" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/User+Name+Mapping/default.aspx" mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/User+Name+Mapping/default.aspx"&gt;these&lt;/A&gt; posts to learn more about User Name Mapping, especially &lt;A class="" title="Configuring User Name Mapping" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/pages/configuring-user-name-mapping.aspx" mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/pages/configuring-user-name-mapping.aspx"&gt;Configuring User Name Mapping&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A class="" title="Configuring User Name Mapping - Part 1" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/06/06/configuring-user-name-mapping-part-1.aspx" mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/06/06/configuring-user-name-mapping-part-1.aspx"&gt;Configuring User Name Mapping - Part 1&lt;/A&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="" title="Configuring User Name Mapping - Part 2 (Simple Mapping)" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/10/02/configuring-user-name-mapping-part-2-simple-mapping.aspx" mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/10/02/configuring-user-name-mapping-part-2-simple-mapping.aspx"&gt;Configuring User Name Mapping - Part 2 (Simple Mapping)&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A class="" title="Configuring User Name Mapping - Part 3 (Advanced Mapping)" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2008/01/24/configuring-user-name-mapping-part-3-advanced-mapping.aspx" mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2008/01/24/configuring-user-name-mapping-part-3-advanced-mapping.aspx"&gt;Configuring User Name Mapping - Part 3 (Advanced Mapping)&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;With Windows Server 2003 R2 and Windows Vista, you can configure Client for NFS to directly fetch this information from AD if it's already there since they offer RFC2307 support. In fact, you can use any RFC2307 compliant directory service.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Configuration for Client for NFS is over with this and you can start using it. To connect to NFS shares, you can use the same built-in mechanisms as you would with a normal Windows share. In fact, you also get to use the familiar mount command to use.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Run the &lt;EM&gt;nfsadmin client &lt;/EM&gt;command to see what options Client for NFS is configured to use. It might show something like this and is self-explanatory -&lt;BR&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409033/425x263.aspx" mce_src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409033/425x263.aspx"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;The File Setting in the above screen shot is the UMASK value Client for NFS will use when you create a new file or a folder on an NFS mount.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;You can use NET command, the mount command which comes with it or the "Map Network Drive..." to map a drive to remote NFS shares. You can also browse the network and look for system which export NFS shares using "Network Neighborhood" or "My Network Places" since Client for NFS adds "NFS Network" under "Entire Network" for people who find it easier to search for machines they would like to connect to.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;The mount command is useful because it lets you override the default parameter which applies to the NFS connections from this computer. The help for mount command can be displayed by running it with /? command line switch -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409036/original.aspx" mce_src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409036/original.aspx"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;It uses a similar syntax like the NET USE command but it's not completely identical. For example, following is what you can use to map z: drive a remote NFS export -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;mount &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;EM&gt;\\servername\sharename&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;EM&gt; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;z:&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;On the performance side, Client for NFS is tuned with parameters which suit most of the environments, but still there are things which can be tweaked to see if it helps you the way you want it -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Read and Write buffers - This can tuned from the MMC snap-in or per mount using the mount command. If you do it using the mount command, the syntax will look like - &lt;BR&gt;&lt;EM&gt;mount -o rsize=16,wsize=16 &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;\\servername\sharename&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt; drive&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The default is 32 KB and works perfectly in most of the scenarios.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Case-sensitive mounts - Since Windows is not case-sensitive, enabling case-sensitive option while mounting the NFS shares can reduces the time taken to look up a file on the server. When this is option is not turned on (which is the default behavior), Client for NFS can perform multiple lookups to locate a single file and that will show up as a performance problem&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;This can only be done using the mount command and the syntax to do this is - &lt;BR&gt;&lt;EM&gt;mount -o casesensitive &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;\\servername\sharename&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt; drive:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;8.3 name cache - As with Windows, Client for NFS also generates a 8.3 format name for the files on the NFS shares being accessed using Client for NFS. This adds up to the processing overhead. Turning off this option is recommended for performance gain. This is done with a registry change and &lt;A class="" title="Turn Off 8.3 Translation to Improve Client For NFS Performance" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/322800" target=_blank mce_href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/322800"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;this&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt; KB article explains the steps.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;8.3 name generation in Windows Server 2003 R2 and later releases are permanently turned off for the same reason.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;NFS Caching - NFS v3 uses caching to improve performance but this can be problematic in certain scenarios. Create "RemoteWriteCache" and "FileAttributeCache" DWORD values under &lt;EM&gt;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Client&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;NFS\CurrentVersion\Users\Default\Cache&lt;/EM&gt; and set these to 0 to disable caching.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Folder Content Caching - Client for NFS also caches the folder contents for 30 seconds to avoid performing lookups to the NFS servers. This can sometimes result in delayed folder content refresh. Follow the steps in &lt;EM&gt;&lt;A class="" title="You experience a delay before the list of new files is returned when you run the DIR command or the LS command after you upgrade to Windows Services for UNIX 3.0 or to Windows Services for UNIX 3.5" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/894071" target=_blank mce_href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/894071"&gt;this&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; knowledgebase article to disable it.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Set this registry setting to a value between 5-25.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Something worth taking a note - although the settings related to different aspects of caching may improves things on the client side, they can have performance percussions on the server side because when caching is not at work, the client may place more calls to the server and depending on the server and network conditions, it may cause the server to sweat more than it would normally. It's completely up to you to decide who would you like to work more for you - NFS client or the server.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8390608" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="SFU" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/SFU/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 R2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+R2/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Vista" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Vista/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 SP1" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+SP1/default.aspx" /><category term="Client for NFS" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Client+for+NFS/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 SP2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+SP2/default.aspx" /><category term="Services for UNIX" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Services+for+UNIX/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Configuring User Name Mapping - Part 3 (Advanced Mapping)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2008/01/24/configuring-user-name-mapping-part-3-advanced-mapping.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2008/01/24/configuring-user-name-mapping-part-3-advanced-mapping.aspx</id><published>2008-01-25T02:20:00Z</published><updated>2008-01-25T02:20:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Configuring User Name Mapping - Part&amp;nbsp;3 (Advanced Mapping)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Simply said - when you map users and groups manually with their UNIX counterparts, it's called Advanced Mapping.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;From the last post on User Name Mapping, you may be aware that Simple Mapping automatically creates maps for all users and group who have the same names in your Windows and UNIX environment. It is possible that you aren't lucky enough to have the same names for users and groups in both the environments. Sometimes, you would want better control on this aspect and&amp;nbsp;may not want to map all the users and groups automatically.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Advanced mappings can be used in such cases. Easy to configure - turn off Simple Maps in User Name Mapping Configuration and map them manually. You can read this&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="" title="Configuring User Name Mapping" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/pages/configuring-user-name-mapping.aspx" target=_blank mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/pages/configuring-user-name-mapping.aspx"&gt;page&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;to see how it can be done in a Windows Server 2003 R2 environment.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Trebuchet MS"&gt;In Services for UNIX 3.x environments, you can do by using the Services for UNIX Administration console. Select User Name Mapping in the left pane, define the UNIX data source and click on Apply -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409040/425x321.aspx" mce_src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409040/425x321.aspx"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Trebuchet MS"&gt;To proceed further, click on Mappings in the right pane. You can now click on Show User Mappings or Show Group Mappings depending on what you want to do -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409050/425x79.aspx" mce_src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409050/425x79.aspx"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Trebuchet MS"&gt;Now, you can display the users/groups in both Windows and UNIX side. Select the objects in both lists and click on Add. You're done.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7228799" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="SFU" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/SFU/default.aspx" /><category term="User Name Mapping" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/User+Name+Mapping/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 R2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+R2/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 SP1" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+SP1/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 SP2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+SP2/default.aspx" /><category term="Services for UNIX" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Services+for+UNIX/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Configuring User Name Mapping - Part 2 (Simple Mapping)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/10/02/configuring-user-name-mapping-part-2-simple-mapping.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/10/02/configuring-user-name-mapping-part-2-simple-mapping.aspx</id><published>2007-10-02T17:45:00Z</published><updated>2007-10-02T17:45:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Configuring User Name Mapping - Part 2 (Simple Mapping)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Continuing the discussion from&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="" title="Configuring User Name Mapping - Part 1" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/06/06/configuring-user-name-mapping-part-1.aspx" target=_blank mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/06/06/configuring-user-name-mapping-part-1.aspx"&gt;Configuring User Name Mapping - Part 1&lt;/A&gt; - &amp;nbsp;I will explain how to get Simple Mappings done in this post.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;To rephrase, User Name Mapping (UNM) bridges the gap between the different user identification used in Windows and UNIX worlds. It's SID which identifies an object in Windows and Active Directory environment but it's UID and GID when it's a UNIX system in question. UNM is also a core authentication component in SFU World. When we are using it in conjunction with Server for NFS, UNM authenticates the incoming NFS access requests. With Client for NFS, it determines the effective UID and GID to be sent with the NFS requests to UNIX NFS servers.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;UNM also provides a single point identity mapping database for all the machines running Server for NFS, Client for NFS and Interix/SUA components. For people looking for availability and clustering capabilities - you can configure UNM Server Pools and you can also run UNM on cluster nodes to achieve load balancing.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;More on it later, back to Simple Mapping...&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;To match the Windows and UNIX identities, UNM uses Windows SAM or Active Directory to identify Windows users and UNIX files (/etc/passwd and /etc/group) or NIS domains as sources for identifying user and group information from UNIX perspective. This information is then mapped using Advanced and Simple Maps. Advanced maps are the ones that you create manually using the Administration Console while the Simple Maps are created automatically between the users and groups which have same names in Windows and UNIX databases.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;It doesn't take much when creating Simple Maps apart from configuring basic things (I am assuming that you have installed the User Name Mapping service already and it's started).&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;First, you need to copy over the /etc/passwd and /etc/group files from your UNIX systems. Filter/Merge them so that they don't have any system account and duplicate UID/GID allocations. Now you can run this command -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;mapadmin adddomainmap&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;-d&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;NTDomain&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;-f&lt;/STRONG&gt; Passwd/GroupDirectory&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;This command enables the Simple Mapping between the users and groups in Windows domain which is specified in place of &lt;EM&gt;NTDomain&lt;/EM&gt; and the UNIX passwd/group files which have been stored under the directory specified in place of &lt;EM&gt;Passwd/GroupDirectory.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Now, you can run the following command to list all the maps -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;mapadmin list -all&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;This lists all&amp;nbsp;the maps which have been created. From my lab system -&lt;BR&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409037/500x282.aspx" mce_src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409037/500x282.aspx"&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Trebuchet MS"&gt;The first command we ran is equivalent of making the following changes using the GUI -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT face="Trebuchet MS"&gt;Defining the UNIX files as the data source -&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409040/425x321.aspx" mce_src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409040/425x321.aspx"&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT face="Trebuchet MS"&gt;Enabling Simple Maps -&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409043/425x261.aspx" mce_src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409043/425x261.aspx"&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT face="Trebuchet MS"&gt;Displaying the Simple Maps -&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409045/500x148.aspx" mce_src="http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/sfu/images/8409045/500x148.aspx"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Trebuchet MS"&gt;It also takes care of enabling and creating Simple Maps for groups.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Trebuchet MS"&gt;&lt;A class="" title="HOW TO: Configure the User Name Mapping Service" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/324073" target=_blank mce_href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/324073"&gt;This&lt;/A&gt; KB article talks about installation and&amp;nbsp;more command line options. I will soon post information in the form of Part 3 on UNM and talk about Advanced Mappings.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5244050" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="SFU" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/SFU/default.aspx" /><category term="User Name Mapping" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/User+Name+Mapping/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 R2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+R2/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 SP1" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+SP1/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 SP2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+SP2/default.aspx" /><category term="Services for UNIX" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Services+for+UNIX/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>SFU hot fixes in email</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/09/07/sfu-hot-fix-in-your-inbox.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/09/07/sfu-hot-fix-in-your-inbox.aspx</id><published>2007-09-07T02:05:00Z</published><updated>2007-09-07T02:05:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;SFU hot fixes in email&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Like any other Microsoft hot fix, you can also receive SFU hot fixes in your inbox - &lt;A class="" href="http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=6294451" target=_blank mce_href="http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=6294451"&gt;http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=6294451&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;All you need is the KB article number which describes the fix&amp;nbsp;you need. While we are talking about it, the following is also important to&amp;nbsp;note -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;"Hotfix Information&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;A Hotfix is a single package that includes one or more files that is used to address a very specific customer problem with a product. A supported Hotfix is now available from Microsoft, but it is only intended to correct the problem that is described in the previous mentioned article. Only apply it to systems that are experiencing this specific problem. This Hotfix may receive additional testing. Therefore, if you are not severely affected by this problem, we recommend that you wait for the next service pack that contains this Hotfix."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Why am I talking about it here?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;At first, it doesn't sound like has anything to do with SFU or UNIX Interoperability components shipped with Windows. But, then users who use these components know that hot fixes get them out of many problems.&amp;nbsp;I am sure a lot of them would prefer getting the hot fix using this form instead opening a case.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Before you rush to request the latest and greatest fixes for SFU or R2 components - be informed that there are a few of them which have very specific prerequisites and if they are not fulfilled, you may run in to other issues. Read below to know about them&amp;nbsp;-&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;&lt;A class="" title="FIX: A Windows Services for UNIX 3.5 hotfix rollup package is available that contains stability and reliability updates" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/913030" target=_blank mce_href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/913030"&gt;KB913030&lt;/A&gt; - Applies only to Services for UNIX 3.5&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;You can install this hot fix on any system that's running Interix Subsystem, Server for NIS or Password Synchronization. It doesn't create any problems but is mentioned here since it contains some stability and reliability update for Interix subsystem and some utilities. You should install this fix before you install any other Interix subsystem hot fix which is newer than this one.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;&lt;A class="" title="FIX: Applications that are written for Windows Services for UNIX 3.5 or for Windows Services for UNIX 3.0 cannot retrieve data from Active Directory on a domain controller that is running Windows Server 2003 R2" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/921599" target=_blank mce_href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/921599"&gt;KB921599&lt;/A&gt; - Applies only to Services for UNIX 3.5&lt;BR&gt;Many people get confused with the information in the Kb article. This hot fix again applies only to Services for UNIX 3.5 Server for NIS and Password Synchronization components. You need this hot fix only if you have added a Windows Server 2003 R2 DC (or upgraded one of the DCs to R2) AND have also installed Server for NIS Identity Management for UNIX (IdMU) component which comes with Windows Server 2003 R2.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;Since IdMU components in R2 use RFC2307 schema classes and attributes, when you install these components in SFU 3.5 environment, the installation process upgrades all of the NIS objects (NIS Domains, maps, users, groups etc.) to use R2 schema enhancements. This breaks Services for UNIX 3.5 Server for NIS and Password Synchronization components since they use a different schema. Installing this hot fix updates the SFU 3.5 Server for NIS and Password Synchronizarion binaries to use RFC2307 classes and attributes and helps SFU 3.5 and R2 IdMU components to co-exist.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;&lt;A class="" title="Some Interix-related functions do not work, and you cannot open a command shell after you upgrade computers to Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 2" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936529" target=_blank mce_href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936529"&gt;KB936529&lt;/A&gt; - Applicable to Services for UNIX 3.5&lt;BR&gt;The previous post talks about it. Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2 installation breaks SFU 3.5 Interix Subsystem and Password Synchronization components and this hot fix helps you to undo that. This hot fix should not be installed on Windows Server 2003 R2 SP2 systems because if you are using Password Synchronization IdMU component, this hot fix replaces the pswdsync.dll file with the one meant for SFU 3.5. As a result, Password Synchronization stop working.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Trebuchet MS"&gt;If you have any questions about any SFU hot fixes, please use the Email button on the blog side bar&amp;nbsp;and shoot me a mail.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4796239" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="SFU" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/SFU/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 R2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+R2/default.aspx" /><category term="Interix" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Interix/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 SP1" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+SP1/default.aspx" /><category term="Password Synchronization" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Password+Synchronization/default.aspx" /><category term="Services for UNIX" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Services+for+UNIX/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 SP2 Services for UNIX" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+SP2+Services+for+UNIX/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Update: Windows Server 2003 SP2 breaks SFU</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/07/11/update-windows-server-2003-sp2-breaks-sfu.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/07/11/update-windows-server-2003-sp2-breaks-sfu.aspx</id><published>2007-07-11T17:05:00Z</published><updated>2007-07-11T17:05:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="trebuchet ms,geneva"&gt;This &lt;A class="" title="Windows Server 2003 SP2 breaks SFU" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/04/27/windows-server-2003-sp2-breaks-sfu.aspx" target=_blank mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/2007/04/27/windows-server-2003-sp2-breaks-sfu.aspx"&gt;post&lt;/A&gt; discussed about a problem with SFU 3.5 Interix and Password Synchronization components which break when you install Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2. It also lists steps to fix it manually using files from another hot fix.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Trebuchet MS"&gt;Microsoft has released a new hot fix - &lt;A class="" title="Some Interix-related functions do not work, and you cannot open a command shell after you upgrade computers to Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 2" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936529" target=_blank mce_href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936529"&gt;KB936529&lt;/A&gt; - which fixes this issue and removes the burden of replacing the correct files manually.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Trebuchet MS"&gt;If you've installed Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2 and running in to this problem, please get this hot fix from PSS and install it. Make sure you don't install this hot fix on an R2 system because that may break correponding R2 components.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3815518" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sfu</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/sfu.aspx</uri></author><category term="SFU" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/SFU/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 R2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+R2/default.aspx" /><category term="Interix" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Interix/default.aspx" /><category term="Password Synchronization" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Password+Synchronization/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2003 SP2" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2003+SP2/default.aspx" /><category term="Services for UNIX" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/sfu/archive/tags/Services+for+UNIX/default.aspx" /></entry></feed>