Page Anatomy

re: Page Anatomy

dalmuti509 — Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:48:30 GMT

Will a site administrator/editor/author? be able to turn off the little arrow drop down for subscribers? In the current version of SharePoint you can't do this without custom webparts or by making the arrow the same color as the back ground.

We looked at sharepoint as a possible solution for an internet site, but inablity to turn off those simple ui elements made it a user unfriendly environment since usually it contains help for subscribers which is worthless.

re: Page Anatomy

Shane Perran — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:40:32 GMT

Fantasitc post guys, these are exactly the type of posts we are all thirsty for.

I don't know if you have ever put any thought into making these type posts downloadable as well. Whitepaper.doc style. It would be nice to have a repository of these aside from Blog Searching. Hint Hint :)

Keep up the great work!

re: Page Anatomy

Jeff — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:59:07 GMT

Dalmuti - Great question and a reminder I left out a pretty key thing. WSS in the next release does security trimmed UI (users only see thing they have the rights to click on - not just getting access denied when they do). One example is readers don't see the little web part chevron whereas contributors will.

Shane - Thanks for the feedback. Yeah a bunch of content is under development for the beta 2 and final release. What you are seeing is a little early (and less polished) preview.

Jeff Teper explains SharePoint's page layouts components in the new SharePoint Server 2007

Andrew Connell [MVP MCMS] — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:43:32 GMT

re: Page Anatomy

magalhaes — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:43:33 GMT

Great post, these kind of descriptions are very usefull and the info about the new products leave us wanting to use them as soon as possible.

Good work guys in the evolution of the Sharepoint / CMS environments!

re: Page Anatomy

dalmuti509 — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:16:28 GMT

Thanks for the info. I love the ways that CMS and Sharepoint are coming together. I am looking forward to using the new Sharepoint server.

Sharepoint Server 2007 Page Components

Wayne Larimore - his bloggin' Weighs — Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:21:13 GMT

re: Page Anatomy

Luis Du Solier G — Sun, 19 Feb 2006 02:45:04 GMT

Great post, thanks!

It would be also great If you include some WebParts with JavaScript functionality/code like Hide Quick Launch Bar, (Todd Bleeker had a great idea about that), and so on...

I cant wait to see it in action...

re: Page Anatomy

Rick — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:13:28 GMT

A very useful post Jeff - thank you.

I'd like to know more about how pages fit in as part of an SP list - as a CMS user I don't know much about how SP lists work. Field controls mapping to columns in a list seems clear enough, but what if you want to use two different page layouts in one list (aka: templates in a channel) - surely the columns wouldn't match?

Also we seem to be getting very mixed messages from MS on web standards. One day we see the announcement of standards-compliant web authoring software, and the next we're told that Sharepoint's built-in web parts will use tables for layout (you say "HTML tables with a list of links" above).

For any organisation with up-to-date rules on building accessible websites, that makes those web parts redundant and we'll still have to re-build them ourselves. It would be great if the SP HTML could be reviewed by some of your CSS experts before launch. Give us a layout with default CSS in place and the opportunity to customise the CSS if we want, and you'll have an even more flexible product offering.

Sharepoint Page components under Sharepoint 2007

Breaking Point Blog — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:49:54 GMT

re: Page Anatomy

sptblog — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 04:03:54 GMT

Rick - Yes 1) In a Web (unfied concept across CMS 2002 channels, SPS 2003 areas and WSS) you can have Pages with different Page Layout Templates. We keep a union of the schema (and there is a base type). 2) Our master pages, templates and list layout tools will ship with a few CSS options or you can replace with your own.

Jeff

Tech Talk PT » Blog Archive » Page Anatomy by Sharepoint Team Blog

Tech Talk PT » Blog Archive » Page Anatomy by Sharepoint Team Blog — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:57:50 GMT

PingBack from http://techtalkpt.wordpress.com/2006/02/27/page-anatomy-by-sharepoint-team-blog/

SharePoint Team Blog : Page Anatomy

Steve Bargelt — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:39:23 GMT

WSS v3.0 (Sharepoint 2007)

C# .Net Tales — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:57:26 GMT

I have been doing some research into the new release of Sharepoint again after inital readings yesterday....

re: Page Anatomy

Anthony Garmont — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 21:08:02 GMT

One of the requests I've been getting is for the ability to sync Sharepoint Calendars with a PocketPC phone. Has this ever been discussed?

Office 2007, SharePoint Server 2007 and Windows SharePoint Services V3

Romeo Pruno — Thu, 13 Apr 2006 00:00:49 GMT

VIA JOPX on SharePoint, MCMS, Office and SOA

The Beauty of SharePoint 2007 - Publishing / Copying...

Jeff Teper explains SharePoint's page layouts components in the new SharePoint Server 2007

Andrew Connell [MVP MCMS] — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:43:38 GMT

re: Page Anatomy

web tasarım — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:26:10 GMT

I have been doing some research into the new release of Sharepoint again after inital readings yesterday....

<a href="http://www.webtasarım.com">web tasarım </a>

re: Page Anatomy

web tasarım — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:36:12 GMT

www.marmaraweb.com

re: Page Anatomy

web tasarım — Fri, 05 May 2006 11:17:47 GMT

One of the requests I've been getting is for the ability to sync Sharepoint Calendars with a PocketPC phone. Has this ever been discussed?

<a href="http://www.marmaraweb.com">web tasarım </a>

re: Page Anatomy

saç ekimi — Sat, 06 May 2006 10:41:06 GMT

It would be also great If you include some WebParts with JavaScript functionality/code like Hide Quick Launch Bar, (Todd Bleeker had a great idea about that), and so on...

see my page http://www.plussclinic.com

re: Page Anatomy

medyum — Sat, 06 May 2006 10:46:52 GMT

Also we seem to be getting very mixed messages from MS on web standards. One day we see the announcement of standards-compliant web authoring software, and the next we're told that Sharepoint's built-in web parts will use tables for layout (you say "HTML tables with a list of links" above). http://www.medyumyakup.net

re: Page Anatomy

medyum — Sat, 06 May 2006 10:47:32 GMT

Shane - Thanks for the feedback. Yeah a bunch of content is under development for the beta 2 and final release. What you are seeing is a little early (and less polished) preview. http://www.medyumnimet.com

re: Page Anatomy

medyum — Sat, 06 May 2006 10:48:05 GMT

We looked at sharepoint as a possible solution for an internet site, but inablity to turn off those simple ui elements made it a user unfriendly environment since usually it contains help for subscribers which is worthless.
http://www.medyum.web.tr

re: Page Anatomy

medyum — Sat, 06 May 2006 10:48:47 GMT

One of the trickiest aspects of the design was getting the relationship between field controls and web parts right. Field controls are bound to a WSS item so workflow, etc. just works. By design, Web Parts are less tightly coupled. In fact one of their advantage is just using the browser, users can add them to the page. As with WSS and SPS V2, there's a lot of flexibility in this model for customization, personalization and targeting that site owners can choose to use.
http://www.medyumyakup.com

re: Page Anatomy

diş kliniği — Sat, 06 May 2006 10:49:28 GMT

Just like CMS 2002, we use the powerful concept of separating presentation from data in web publishing. In the Office SharePoint Server, the actual "page" is a item a WSS list and the framework knows how to assemble these. This list has columns that are bound to three field controls (title, picture, article). Re-using SharePoint lists for data storage lets us build on existing and new WSS list features like content types, check-in/out, versioning, per item security, workflow and more more. In edit mode, the field controls place constraints on the author for what content they can put in the "page".The screenshot above shows the page with the console visible where authors, approvers, etc. have the appropriate actions based on their role. http://www.denthouse.com.tr

re: Page Anatomy

kitap özetleri — Sat, 06 May 2006 12:23:08 GMT

For any organisation with up-to-date rules on building accessible websites, that makes those web parts redundant and we'll still have to re-build them ourselves. It would be great if the SP HTML could be reviewed by some of your CSS experts before launch.
http://www.t-kamul.com

re: Page Anatomy

buharlı temizlik makinası — Tue, 16 May 2006 14:00:01 GMT

<a href="http://www.buharlitemizlikmakinasi.com/index.php">buharlı temizlik makinası</a>

Random valuable finds...

Andrew Connell [MVP MCMS] — Thu, 18 May 2006 05:33:32 GMT

re: Page Anatomy

banyo mutfak — Fri, 26 May 2006 11:11:52 GMT

Simpson Wrought Iron Doors feature forged iron-black grille designs fully enclosed between two panes of textured glass - allowing light to pass through while maintaining privacy. The insulated glass unit makes the doors a natural choice for those wanting a Southwestern or old-world look.
<a href="http://www.ak-bm.com">banyo mutfak
</a>

re: Page Anatomy

baskılı balon — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 11:36:12 GMT

<a href="http://www.balon.web.tr">baskili balon</a>We would like to see as much CSS1 as possible. CSS2 should be limited to widely-supported elements only. The css Zen Garden is about functional, practical CSS and not the latest bleeding-edge tricks viewable by 2% of the browsing public. The only real requirement we have is that your CSS validates.

Unfortunately, designing this way highlights the flaws in the various implementations of CSS. Different browsers display differently, even completely valid CSS at times, and this becomes maddening when a fix for one leads to breakage in another. View the Resources page for information on some of the fixes available. Full browser compliance is still sometimes a pipe dream, and we do not expect you to come up with pixel-perfect code across every platform. But do test in as many as you can. If your design doesn’t work in at least IE5+/Win and Mozilla (run by over 90% of the population), chances are we won’t accept it.

2007 Microsoft Office Server System Reference Material

The Boiler Room - Mark Kruger, SharePoint MVP — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:12:16 GMT

Download SharePoint Beta2:

Important Documentation Prior to SharePoint Beta 2 Installation
Get...

Sharepoint 2007 Web Content Pages

C# .Net Tales — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 05:32:41 GMT

I've been having a bit of an experiment with Sharepoint 2007 and creating a Site of 'Publishing Site'...

re: Page Anatomy

Mattlab — Sun, 05 Nov 2006 22:30:44 GMT

How do I use that KPI webpart? Is that custom coded or does it come by default in sharepoint server?

re: Page Anatomy

vivekthangaswamy — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:07:18 GMT

When i create the new Migration Profile in Central Administrator under Manage Microsoft Content Management Server Migration Profiles, i'm not able to complete Migration Profile creation process.

It return the following message:

Specified argument was out of the range of valid values.

Parameter name: value

Note: This is for MOSS 2007 and not SharePoint 2003

help needed...

" + title + "

" + title + " — Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:41:57 GMT

PingBack from http://www.virtual-generations.com/2007/02/26/moss-2007-master-pages-and-sharepoint-designer/

re: Page Anatomy

modelistlik — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:00:18 GMT

It would be great if the SP HTML could be reviewed by some of your CSS experts before launch.

2007 MOSS Resource Links (Microsoft Office SharePoint Server)

The Boiler Room - Mark Kruger, Microsoft SharePoint MVP — Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:15:09 GMT

2007 MOSS Resource Links (Microsoft Office SharePoint Server) Here is an assortment of various 2007 Microsoft

re: Page Anatomy

web tasarim — Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:45:34 GMT

Helpfull! Thanks! We develop web sites ( web tasarım ) on http://www.ikovan.com like this!

re: Page Anatomy

karnca — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 21:41:41 GMT

SHOW reklam - www.showreklamweb.com anlamal matbaa ofset, dijital, kurumsal, reklam, hizmetleri, promosyon, dijital, katalog, matbaa, arama, kurumsal, show, ajans, tabela, internet,

web tasarm, matbaa, web design, fatura, kartvizit, katalog, bror

<a href="http://www.showreklamweb.com">showreklamweb - www.showreklamweb.com anlaşmalı matbaa ofset, dijital, kurumsal, reklam, hizmetleri, promosyon, dijital, katalog, matbaa, arama, kurumsal, show, ajans, tabela, internet,</a>

Sharepoint 2007 Web Content Pages

Mirrored Blogs — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:39:29 GMT

Body: I've been having a bit of an experiment with Sharepoint 2007 and creating a Site of 'Publishing

re: Page Anatomy

cam filmi — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:15:54 GMT

It would be great if the SP HTML could be reviewed by some of your CSS experts before launch. thanks.

re: Page Anatomy

şömine — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:01:30 GMT

Is that custom coded or does it come by default in sharepoint server?

halı yıkama

halı yıkama — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:23:45 GMT

2007 MOSS Resource Links (Microsoft Office SharePoint Server) Here is an assortment of various 2007 Microsoft good thanks.

hastane

hastane — Thu, 01 May 2008 13:10:28 GMT

ust like with content - we are trying to provide separation of presentation from data and easier re-use and customization. In addition to the BDC parts, we'll have parts designed for simple business intelligence scenarios. In the example above, I've shown a KPI (Key Performance Indicator) Web Part that can bring in data from SQL Analysis Services, Excel Services, SharePoint lists or even just static data.

diyet

diyet — Wed, 07 May 2008 12:39:46 GMT

It would be also great If you include some WebParts with JavaScript functionality/code like Hide Quick Launch Bar. for thanks.

re: Page Anatomy

egzoz — Tue, 27 May 2008 00:46:34 GMT

e trying to provide separation of presentation from data and easier re-use and customization. In addition to the BDC parts, we'll have parts designed for simple business intelligence scenarios. In the example above, I've shown a KP

sharepoint 2007 where is the css

sharepoint 2007 where is the css — Thu, 29 May 2008 17:27:15 GMT

PingBack from http://jordon.thedigestabout.info/sharepoint2007whereisthecss.html

new web parts sharepoint 2007

new web parts sharepoint 2007 — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:27:28 GMT

PingBack from http://aidenwebsite.rack111.com/newwebpartssharepoint2007.html

re: Page Anatomy

Tom N — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:52:44 GMT

You state: "I should note that we'll have a lot richer navigation options out-of-box than SPS 2003 or CMS 2002 and if you don't like ours you can buy or build a 3rd-party controls written to the new ASP.NET 2.0 navigation provider interface and still use all our underlying site management capabilities."

I am very interested in doing precisely this: using ASP.NET 2.0 controls in lieu of the standard navigation. Can you spell exactly how this is done and what tools/products are currently compatible with this standard?

Resizing Page Layout Field Controls

Gary — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:49:38 GMT

Hi, I have created a page layout which displays perfectly when rendered in IE. When it is in edit mode (when I create an new page or edit an existing one) the fields stretch very far horizontally across the browser making it quite unwieldy to work with. How do I set the size of the field controls and control the layout when in "edit" mode.

Also are there any resources available that describe the Tag Properties of the publishing controls?

Thanks very much

Regards

Gary

jeneratör

jeneratör — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:10:21 GMT

I am interested in doing precisely this: using ASP.NET 2.0 controls in lieu of the standard navigation.

konut

konut — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:14:40 GMT

I am very interested in doing precisely this: using ASP.NET 2.0 controls in lieu of the standard navigation. very good content.

kartvizit program

kartvizit program — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:00:20 GMT

PingBack from http://dominicnews.free-site-host.com/kartvizitprogram.html

buyu

buyu — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:42:18 GMT

Anaokulu Merkezi

anaokulu merkezi — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:42:17 GMT

I am interested in doing precisely this: using ASP.NET 2.0 controls in lieu of the standard navigation. Very good content, thanks.

Anaokulu, yuva, kreş

re: Page Anatomy

aöf rehber — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:48:16 GMT

I am interested in doing precisely this: using ASP.NET 2.0 controls in lieu of the standard navigation.

nikah şekeri

nikah şekeri — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:44:51 GMT

İtina ile hazırlanmış birbirinden güzel nikah şekeri ve davetiye modelleri...

re: Page Anatomy

medyum — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:15:56 GMT

It would be also great If you include some WebParts with JavaScript functionality/code like Hide Quick Launch Bar.

re: Page Anatomy

astroloji — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:19:23 GMT

It would be great if the SP HTML could be reviewed by some of your CSS experts before launch.

Microsoft SharePoint Team Blog Page Anatomy | Outdoor Ceiling Fans

Microsoft SharePoint Team Blog Page Anatomy | Outdoor Ceiling Fans — Sun, 31 May 2009 14:53:55 GMT

PingBack from http://outdoorceilingfansite.info/story.php?id=23179

Microsoft SharePoint Team Blog Page Anatomy | Outdoor Ceiling Fans

Microsoft SharePoint Team Blog Page Anatomy | Outdoor Ceiling Fans — Sun, 31 May 2009 16:57:52 GMT

PingBack from http://outdoorceilingfansite.info/story.php?id=5543

Microsoft SharePoint Team Blog Page Anatomy | fix my credit

Microsoft SharePoint Team Blog Page Anatomy | fix my credit — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:36:32 GMT

PingBack from http://fixmycrediteasily.info/story.php?id=14007

Microsoft SharePoint Team Blog Page Anatomy | patio set

Microsoft SharePoint Team Blog Page Anatomy | patio set — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:03:12 GMT

PingBack from http://patiosetsite.info/story.php?id=543

Microsoft SharePoint Team Blog Page Anatomy | debt consolidator

Microsoft SharePoint Team Blog Page Anatomy | debt consolidator — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:57:28 GMT

PingBack from http://mydebtconsolidator.info/story.php?id=8461