<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>When the Opposite of Transparent isn't Opaque</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/31/when-the-opposite-of-transparent-isn-t-opaque.aspx</link><description>When you provide an assembly that will be called by partially trusted callers, you need to make sure that you do a thorough security audit of that assembly -- especially if it’s an APTCA assembly. One of the primary reasons this security review is required</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>What's New in Security for v2.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/31/when-the-opposite-of-transparent-isn-t-opaque.aspx#458644</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:08:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:458644</guid><dc:creator>.Net Security Blog</dc:creator><description>There's a ton of new and enhanced security features coming with the v2.0 release of the CLR.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; However,...</description></item><item><title>Marking Your Code Transparent</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/31/when-the-opposite-of-transparent-isn-t-opaque.aspx#462976</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 19:40:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:462976</guid><dc:creator>.Net Security Blog</dc:creator><description>Last week I discussed the concepts of security transparency and security critical code.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; Now it's...</description></item><item><title>Partial Trust and Click Once</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/31/when-the-opposite-of-transparent-isn-t-opaque.aspx#519155</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:08:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:519155</guid><dc:creator>Dinis Cruz @ Owasp .Net Project</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Find&lt;br&gt;	Out What's New with Code Access Security in the .NET Framework 2.0&lt;br&gt;	and its&lt;br&gt;	side notes (MSDN...</description></item><item><title>MCPD : Assemblys transparentes e opacos</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/31/when-the-opposite-of-transparent-isn-t-opaque.aspx#540162</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:35:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:540162</guid><dc:creator>Dennes</dc:creator><description>&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;O .NET 2.0 traz novos conceitos de seguran&amp;amp;#231;a, tal como os Assemblys transparentes e opacos. Esse...</description></item><item><title>Silverlight Security II: What Makes a Method Critical</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/31/when-the-opposite-of-transparent-isn-t-opaque.aspx#2524976</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 18:33:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2524976</guid><dc:creator>.NET Security Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday we talked about the CoreCLR security model , and how it is built upon the transparency model&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>