<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>RSACryptoServiceProvider, Impersonation, and Ephemeral Keys</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2006/09/21/764977.aspx</link><description>If you construct an RSACryptoServiceProvider class without specifying a name for the key, the CLR will create a random ephemeral key for you. However, ephemeral keys are not supported by the underlying CAPI APIs on all of the platforms that the CLR was</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Interesting Finds: September 21, 2006</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2006/09/21/764977.aspx#765554</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 06:13:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:765554</guid><dc:creator>Jason Haley</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: RSACryptoServiceProvider, Impersonation, and Ephemeral Keys</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2006/09/21/764977.aspx#766157</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:39:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:766157</guid><dc:creator>Guido Domenici</dc:creator><description>I was casually reading this blog entry via my normal RSS feed, while trying to debug a seemingly unsurmountable problem in my code. Then, suddenly I counted 1+1=2 and realized that this article I was reading by pure coincidence was exactly the solution to my problem! The finalizer thread turned out to be running as the  non-impersonated user, thus not being able to delete the ephemeral key. Thanks guys, you saved my day.</description></item></channel></rss>