<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Translation Guide between Managed Extensions and the new C++/CLI binding Available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/08/21/218487.aspx</link><description>C and C++ programmers are notorious for relying on pointer indirection, and it seems blog entries are not immune to this. A translation guide attempting to exhaustively detail the differences between the original Managed Extensions for C++ (released with</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Translation Guide between Managed Extensions and the new C++/CLI binding Available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/08/21/218487.aspx#218498</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:218498</guid><dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator><description>I believe the link should really point to &lt;a target="_new" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnvs05/html/TransGuide.asp"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnvs05/html/TransGuide.asp&lt;/a&gt; not to https://mail.microsoft.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=&lt;a target="_new" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnvs05/html/TransGuide.asp"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnvs05/html/TransGuide.asp&lt;/a&gt; which seems to be copied from OWA&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Some excited new C++/CLI features mentioned in the Visual C++ FAQ</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/08/21/218487.aspx#218790</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:218790</guid><dc:creator>Alexei</dc:creator><description>Stan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A FAQ for Visual C++ released recently: &lt;a target="_new" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/productinfo/faq/default.aspx#C++/CLI"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/productinfo/faq/default.aspx#C++/CLI&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The FAQ mentions a couple of features for which no info was available previously.  Specifically see the section about features to be impelemented in RTM which are not in Beta 1:&lt;br&gt;1) Ref classes with automatic storage duration, including destructors, copy constructors (!), and assignment (!). (no example given)&lt;br&gt;2) Operators (instance and global). (the example shows a ref class with an instance operator+())&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The above features make ref classes much closer to native classes in C++.  Could you explain what those features are and how are they going to be different from the corresponding features of the standard C++?</description></item><item><title>re: Translation Guide between Managed Extensions and the new C++/CLI binding Available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/08/21/218487.aspx#218918</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:218918</guid><dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator><description>When can we expect to see &amp;quot;mscfront&amp;quot; in beta? I have thousands of lines of code in the old syntax and I would love to test the migration utility.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Translation Guide between Managed Extensions and the new C++/CLI binding Available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/08/21/218487.aspx#219189</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:219189</guid><dc:creator>Rjae Easton</dc:creator><description>A Wiki topic could provide a venue for dissemination and refinement while off-loading &amp;quot;comment management&amp;quot; from your plate.</description></item><item><title>re: Translation Guide between Managed Extensions and the new C++/CLI binding Available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/08/21/218487.aspx#219196</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:219196</guid><dc:creator>stan lippman</dc:creator><description>honestly, i don't know what that involves. i've looked at wiki once or twice but i don't have any clue how to set it up ... hint, hint ...</description></item><item><title>re: Translation Guide between Managed Extensions and the new C++/CLI binding Available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/08/21/218487.aspx#221385</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:221385</guid><dc:creator>stan lippman</dc:creator><description>albert asks, when can we expect to see mscfront in beta. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;my conception of the tool is that it will be made available for download as an informal or `brown bag' binary [similar to how cfront 1.0 was released] on or around the time of beta2 ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;it will not be released `in the box' and i imagine that i will post fixes to it as needed on a weekly or if necessary daily basis. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;it will come with a user guide, the translation guide. there are currently no plans to release it as source, but that may change -- probably depending on how useless it is viewed :-) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;hopefully that answers more questions than it raises. ...</description></item><item><title>re: Translation Guide between Managed Extensions and the new C++/CLI binding Available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/08/21/218487.aspx#221386</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:221386</guid><dc:creator>stan lippman</dc:creator><description>Alexei asks,&lt;br&gt;1) Ref classes with automatic storage duration, including destructors, copy constructors (!), and assignment (!). (no example given) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-- yes, this is not turned on with the original beta1; we just released a `refresh' today and i didn't check if that includes it -- you can read about it in my blog entry on `deterministic finalization' and within the translation guide -- hopefully i fixed the link -- thanks for those who commented -- in particular Eric Jarvi of msft who actually exlained to me what happened.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) Operators (instance and global). (the example shows a ref class with an instance operator+()) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;yes, again. the design team impressed me with this -- i was worried this would overwhelm -- the ability to define a global, instance, and static operator+, for example.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;however, you cannot write a function object without the ability to overload the call operator (()), and the stl/cli port needed this sort of ability. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;so, yes to both your questions, although you may not find my answers providing sufficient detail.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;what you and everyone SHOULD DO is download the refresh of beta 1 -- the team here worked very hard, and have provided both additional functionality (yes!) and significant bug fixes. so this is the bag of bits to begin pounding on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;stan</description></item><item><title>Translation Guide between Managed Extensions and the new C++/CLI binding Available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/08/21/218487.aspx#6556849</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:36:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6556849</guid><dc:creator>Translation Guide between Managed Extensions and the new C++/CLI binding Available</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://feeds.maxblog.eu/item_1230784.html"&gt;http://feeds.maxblog.eu/item_1230784.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Deleting Int32? | keyongtech</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/08/21/218487.aspx#9362564</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:17:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9362564</guid><dc:creator>Deleting Int32? | keyongtech</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.keyongtech.com/734779-deleting-int32"&gt;http://www.keyongtech.com/734779-deleting-int32&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Stan Lippman s BLog Translation Guide between Managed Extensions and | debt consolidator</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/08/21/218487.aspx#9788782</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:05:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9788782</guid><dc:creator> Stan Lippman s BLog Translation Guide between Managed Extensions and | debt consolidator</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://mydebtconsolidator.info/story.php?id=5083"&gt;http://mydebtconsolidator.info/story.php?id=5083&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>