The Type of a String Literal Revisited ...http://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/12/04/275069.aspxIn the course of these entries, I have twice addressed the issue of the type of a string literal under C++/CLI -- in particular when resolving an overloaded function call. The issue is illustrated in the following example, public ref class R { public:en-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)Stan Lippman on String Literals in C /CLIhttp://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/12/04/275069.aspx#275777Mon, 06 Dec 2004 21:08:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:275777BufferOverrunlippman_rss2lj: The Type of a String Literal Revisited ...http://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/12/04/275069.aspx#740944Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:54:23 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:740944lippman_rss2lj: The Type of a String Literal Revisited ...PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.livejournal.com/users/lippman_rss2lj/7909.html">http://www.livejournal.com/users/lippman_rss2lj/7909.html</a>The Type of a String Literal Revisited ... by lippman_rss2lj () | LjSEEK.COMhttp://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/12/04/275069.aspx#740945Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:54:26 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:740945The Type of a String Literal Revisited ... by lippman_rss2lj () | LjSEEK.COMPingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.ljseek.com/the-type-of-a-string-literal-revisited_12697915.html">http://www.ljseek.com/the-type-of-a-string-literal-revisited_12697915.html</a> Stan Lippman s BLog The Type of a String Literal Revisited | Portable Greenhousehttp://blogs.msdn.com/slippman/archive/2004/12/04/275069.aspx#9690165Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:19:27 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9690165 Stan Lippman s BLog The Type of a String Literal Revisited | Portable Greenhouse<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://portablegreenhousesite.info/story.php?id=32888">http://portablegreenhousesite.info/story.php?id=32888</a></p>