<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Final US OOXML Voting Result - Yes with Comments</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/smcbreen/archive/2007/08/26/final-us-ooxml-voting-result-yes-with-comments.aspx</link><description>This is already everywhere, but I thought worth repeating for readers of my blog. On the 24th the results of the United States vote for Open XML were made public. The INCITS Executive Board approved a “Yes with comments” position in a 12-3-1 (yes, no,</description><dc:language>en-NZ</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>MSDN Blog Postings  &amp;raquo; Final US OOXML Voting Result - Yes with Comments</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/smcbreen/archive/2007/08/26/final-us-ooxml-voting-result-yes-with-comments.aspx#4570681</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:04:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4570681</guid><dc:creator>MSDN Blog Postings  » Final US OOXML Voting Result - Yes with Comments</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2007/08/26/final-us-ooxml-voting-result-yes-with-comments/"&gt;http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2007/08/26/final-us-ooxml-voting-result-yes-with-comments/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Final US OOXML Voting Result - Yes with Comments</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/smcbreen/archive/2007/08/26/final-us-ooxml-voting-result-yes-with-comments.aspx#4577174</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:37:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4577174</guid><dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;By chance have you read the following? &amp;nbsp;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.arstdesign.com/articles/OOXML-is-defective-by-design.html"&gt;http://www.arstdesign.com/articles/OOXML-is-defective-by-design.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Final US OOXML Voting Result - Yes with Comments</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/smcbreen/archive/2007/08/26/final-us-ooxml-voting-result-yes-with-comments.aspx#4577991</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:33:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4577991</guid><dc:creator>smcbreen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Adam,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes I have read that articale David Lane also asked this question on this bog post:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/smcbreen/archive/2007/08/24/people-implementing-ecma-office-open-xml.aspx#comments"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/smcbreen/archive/2007/08/24/people-implementing-ecma-office-open-xml.aspx#comments&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I've attempted to address the concern there - my key point is the commitment from Ecma and ourselves to correct any errors - I'm not commenting on the factual correctness of the document you've highlighter rather that we are commited to doing the right thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sean&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Final US OOXML Voting Result - Yes with Comments</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/smcbreen/archive/2007/08/26/final-us-ooxml-voting-result-yes-with-comments.aspx#4682769</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:15:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4682769</guid><dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Congratulations, you are one step closer to making the ISO completely pointless. &amp;nbsp;Microsoft is opening the door.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*golfclap*&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"I've attempted to address the concern there - my key point is the commitment from Ecma and ourselves to correct any errors"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yeah, that is bullshit. &amp;nbsp;Everyone in the room knows you won't fix crap because it would require fixing some of the legacy cruft and thus would not be compatible with Office 2007.&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>