<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>When is Microsoft going to support JMS?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/smguest/archive/2005/03/17/398134.aspx</link><description>Wow, if I had a dollar for every time I was asked this question...! A high number of posts on this subject have been circulating recently. I wanted to spend a couple of minutes to first define what JMS really is, and summarize the Interop options that</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: When is Microsoft going to support JMS?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/smguest/archive/2005/03/17/398134.aspx#398278</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:398278</guid><dc:creator>Chad Wilson</dc:creator><description>Thanks for your thoughts Simon - that makes a lot of sense. I was aware of such bridging products that are available. The problem always lies in the fact that they are commercial products and ... not cheap, especially if you just want basic JMS interop, rather than all the other features they offer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The vendor of the JMS queue we currently use does not provide a .Net native option - perhaps this will become available in the future.</description></item><item><title>Bridging</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/smguest/archive/2005/03/17/398134.aspx#398838</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:398838</guid><dc:creator>Wayne Citrin</dc:creator><description>Hi Simon --&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the mention of JNBridgePro.  For more information on our JMS adapter for BizTalk server, I recommend looking at an MSDN Webcast we did on the topic: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a target="_new" href="http://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/WebCastEventDetails.aspx?culture=en-US&amp;amp;EventID=1032265920&amp;amp;EventCategory=4"&gt;http://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/WebCastEventDetails.aspx?culture=en-US&amp;amp;EventID=1032265920&amp;amp;EventCategory=4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Readers can also contact us at info@jnbridge.com for more information.</description></item><item><title>re: When is Microsoft going to support JMS?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/smguest/archive/2005/03/17/398134.aspx#398884</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:398884</guid><dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator><description>Chad, what implementation are you using?</description></item><item><title>re: When is Microsoft going to support JMS?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/smguest/archive/2005/03/17/398134.aspx#399691</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:399691</guid><dc:creator>user</dc:creator><description>MQ Series is by far not the same thing as JMS. MQ Series has been around as a mainframe messaging system with much more features than JMS.</description></item><item><title>re: When is Microsoft going to support JMS?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/smguest/archive/2005/03/17/398134.aspx#400221</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:400221</guid><dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator><description>Totally agree - I hope I didn't apply this in my post...  -Simon</description></item></channel></rss>