<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx</link><description>Today, I’m pleased to announce the availability of the beta of Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1. Based on your feedback, Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 addresses issues that were found through a combination of customer reports, MSDN Product Feedback</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Now Available: Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772320</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:07:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772320</guid><dc:creator>Rob Caron</dc:creator><description>Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta is now available for download. There's a lot of stuff in this...</description></item><item><title>Microsoft releases Visual Studio 2005 SP1 beta, reveals Vista tooling plan</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772331</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:11:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772331</guid><dc:creator>Microsoft News Tracker</dc:creator><description>	Microsoft Corporate VP S. “Soma” Somasegar has the news at his weblog:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...</description></item><item><title>VS2005 sp1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772340</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:18:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772340</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Stopford's Weblog</dc:creator><description>Beta of this is up on connect, details from Somasegar.Vista compat is great to hear, it will be interesting</description></item><item><title>SP1 beta is now available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772351</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:28:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772351</guid><dc:creator>Buck Hodges</dc:creator><description>For Team Build users, I'll spare you the suspense and tell you that there are no meaningful changes in...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772361</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:34:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772361</guid><dc:creator>dhopton</dc:creator><description>What sort of issues can we expect on vista? Are you flat out telling me I can't start the IDE, or are you mearly suggesting that I'm gonna have some non-admin issues. I've not seen anything when running as non-admin on XP, nor have I seen any significant issues runnign VS2005 on Vista.</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772376</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:46:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772376</guid><dc:creator>G.T.</dc:creator><description>I am glad the sp1 is there, vs 2005 works under vista with no problems with a very large c# / web / windows forms solution, and I hope the sp1 improves the overall vs 2005 performance and ability to handle large solutions.</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772381</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:49:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772381</guid><dc:creator>B# .NET Blog</dc:creator><description>Rather unexpectedly, the availability of a SP1 beta for Visual Studio 2005 was announced today by soma....</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio support on Vista: doubts revealed</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772389</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:55:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772389</guid><dc:creator>STEFANO DEMILIANI</dc:creator><description>Visual Studio support on Vista: doubts revealed</description></item><item><title>VS2005 SP1 Beta is out</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772403</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:06:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772403</guid><dc:creator>Andrej Tozon's blog</dc:creator><description>Yes, very much anticipated VS2005 SP1 Beta is available through Microsoft Connect . If you signed up</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772406</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:09:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772406</guid><dc:creator>David Taylor</dc:creator><description>Somasegar, thanks for this...but it would be helpful if you could answer a few simple questions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Will VS 2005 already run fine on Vista (without SP1) with UAC protection disabled and using an admin account? &amp;nbsp;If not what areas have problems?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You say that VS 2003 will not be supported. &amp;nbsp;I am find with that, as you should focus on the future, but:&lt;br&gt;2) Will VS 2003 run on Vista with UAC protection disabled and using an admin account? &amp;nbsp;If not what areas have problems, or doesnt it even load?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;David</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta Available Now</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772412</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:15:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772412</guid><dc:creator>Ed Hintz (MSFT)</dc:creator><description>The beta for Visual Studio 2005 SP1 is available now at Microsoft Connect.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; If you've been a user...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772487</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:02:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772487</guid><dc:creator>Thomas Lee</dc:creator><description>I'm just a little confused with the messaging here. Soma says that VS 2005 will work on Vista but will likely have compatibility issues and that the VS team are working with the Vista team to 'understand' those and to find work arounds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gee - Vista has been 5 years in the making, and VS has been around for a while. And just a few weeks before Vista should RTM these issues should be nailed. Or is Vista a surprise to the VS team (and vice versa).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My immediate take is that if VS is not going to work on Vista, how bad is the App Compat going to be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that the VS team should not be slipping to accomotate this. But Vista sure as heck should be able to support apps like VS - and if that means slipping Vista again, then so be it. Especiallly as VS 2002/2003 are not to be supported.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Posts like this make me even more nervous about Vista. While I'm sure it wasn't Soma's intention, it's just more proof that corporates need to wait for SP1.</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta Available &amp;laquo; IBlogMgr blogMgr = (IBlogMgr)Factory.Create(&amp;#8221;Ezequiel Jadib&amp;#8221;);</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772501</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:09:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772501</guid><dc:creator>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta Available « IBlogMgr blogMgr = (IBlogMgr)Factory.Create(”Ezequiel Jadib”);</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://ejadib.wordpress.com/2006/09/26/visual-studio-2005-sp1-beta-available/"&gt;http://ejadib.wordpress.com/2006/09/26/visual-studio-2005-sp1-beta-available/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta Now Available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772514</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:16:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772514</guid><dc:creator>Heath Stewart's Blog</dc:creator><description>As announced on Soma's blog, Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta is available today. You can sign...</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta Now Available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772520</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:22:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772520</guid><dc:creator>Innovate from India (Development Center)</dc:creator><description>VS 2005 SP1 Beta is now available for our device customers. This is a significant release for Visual...</description></item><item><title>VS2005 SP1 beta et Vista  </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772529</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:31:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772529</guid><dc:creator>Luc Gauthier's Weblogs</dc:creator><description>Voir le blog de &amp;nbsp;Somasegar pour plus de d&amp;amp;#233;tail ( &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx&lt;/a&gt;)....</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772544</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:40:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772544</guid><dc:creator>AndrewSven</dc:creator><description>I'm glad to see that you are not following the VS2003 SP scheduling.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any fix for current systems that can be safely released now should be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vista (like any new system) will bring some issues to the table; the idea of waiting for Vista to fix current systems makes me think bad things.</description></item><item><title>Can hardly wait to dig in...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772703</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:54:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772703</guid><dc:creator>if ( ! blogClogged )</dc:creator><description>I can hardly wait to dig into these things which I have long anticipated and greatly need... bravo &amp;nbsp;WIT...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772728</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:12:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772728</guid><dc:creator>Mike Dimmick</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot; However, we will not support Visual Studio .NET 2002 or Visual Studio .NET 2003 as development environments on Windows Vista.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is in direct contravention of your support lifecycle policy and is unacceptable.</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772737</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:19:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772737</guid><dc:creator>Stefano Demiliani</dc:creator><description>Seeing that the support for VS2003 will not be present on Vista is a bit worried for us. We've lots of large customers that works with .NET 1.1 applications and surely they will not be ready for a migration soon. In second, we work a lot on the Dynamics platform, and here .NET 1.1 is he standard.&lt;br&gt;Should we plan to have a machine with Vista and a machine with XP? Not so good... By doing this, you'll see that XP will be the main platform for a lot of time.</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772746</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:33:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772746</guid><dc:creator>AndrewSeven</dc:creator><description>While being able to to use VS 2003 is not important to me, building 2.0 apps is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will I be able to build C#/CLI/CLR 2.0 apps (with VS) without have intererence from the 3.0 (former WinFx) extensions so that the apps can run on all systems supporting 2.0&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio and Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772750</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:37:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772750</guid><dc:creator>ctodx</dc:creator><description>Some interesting news appeared on Somasegar's blog this morning (in essence, he's in charge of devdiv...</description></item><item><title>Support for development IDEs on Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772760</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:41:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772760</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Moth</dc:creator><description>Support for development IDEs on Vista</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772797</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:14:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772797</guid><dc:creator>Amit Bahree</dc:creator><description>I have to agree with Thoma's comments above. Sorry I am going to be critical.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Somasegar, this just confuses people more and does not help at all. Why is that your flag ship dev product does not work well enough with your flag ship brand new OS? Were you taken by surprise?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So for those who work for in the industry, what are we supposed to say to our clients? Oh sorry, we cannot do anything on Vista right now since we don't have a fully supported dev suite? So, why should we use either of the products? Hmmm .... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, not just stating VS.NET 2003 will not work, does not cut it. Is it a ploy to get people to upgrade to VS.NET 2005 (assuming it will work at some &amp;nbsp;point)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dare I even ask about TFS and VSTS and Vista (given there are so many issues with it on XP). I suppose no hotfixes can be released to get this fixed?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Eagerly awaiting replies.</description></item><item><title>DevInstall.Com&amp;#8217;s WebLog &amp;raquo; Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Windows Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772814</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:30:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772814</guid><dc:creator>DevInstall.Com’s WebLog » Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Windows Vista</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.devinstall.com/?p=8"&gt;http://blog.devinstall.com/?p=8&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772823</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:34:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772823</guid><dc:creator>Disappointed</dc:creator><description>It is too bad that we had to wait this long to get the product we should have had on the release date.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bottom line is that VS2005 was not ready when it was released. &amp;nbsp;Not even close. &amp;nbsp;This has cost me countless hours of productivity. &amp;nbsp;Let's not even talk about my stress level. &amp;nbsp;I'm on a project with a rigid release date and using VS2005 before SP1 was a huge mistake. &amp;nbsp;This is based on various bugs I've experienced which have been mentioned in numerous newsgroups.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.microsoftweblog.com/2005/11/05/problems-with-visual-studio-2005/"&gt;http://www.microsoftweblog.com/2005/11/05/problems-with-visual-studio-2005/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And now by not supporting 2003 on Vista, you force us to upgrade to this product?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please learn from your mistakes here Microsoft; do not pack Orcas with features that will make you rush out another premature product. &amp;nbsp;It should be more like SQL05, which runs flawlessly. &amp;nbsp;More beta testing is an absolute must, with realistic test projects and solutions. &amp;nbsp;If you repeat your mistakes we will all be learning Java soon because the developer market won't put up with this.</description></item><item><title>TFS SP1 Beta now available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772850</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:59:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772850</guid><dc:creator>My VSTS Blog</dc:creator><description>The first post I noticed this morning with the good news was Brian Harry's &amp;amp;quot; TFS SP1 Beta is available!!!</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772949</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:34:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772949</guid><dc:creator>Good News =9</dc:creator><description>Woww Great news !!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope that this resolve some performance issues also, because the VS2005 is killing me in production environments with more than 50.000 lines of code =(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Based on your feedback of having SP1 for VS 2005 soon, we decided to separate the two. &amp;nbsp;Visual Studio 2005, with its support for the .NET Framework 2.0 and add-ins to support the .NET Framework 3.0, Windows Vista, and the 2007 Microsoft Office system, provides a first-class development experience for developers&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This show the names problems that you generate in the cummunity !!, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;and add-ins to support the .NET Framework 3.0, Windows Vista&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;.NET 3.0 is the WinVista addons so don't call it 3.0 but that is an old history that generates a lot of disappoint in the community and you know that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bad for that, I was loving the new MS way but now, I realize that the marketing is again here playing a very hard rol in the game. Because this time the others environments are evolving in the right way, while you are trying to sell things fast instead of focus on what you sell.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love .NET 1.1, I love .NET 2.0, I love the future C# 3.0 but please stop doing new buggy versions or all the people that comes from the JAva world, will come back to it if .NET become buggy like now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just a real case, some time ago I release a program to a customer, and some days later he call me and said: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Have you read the mails ?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;- What mails&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The mails from your program&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;- But the program don't send mails !!!&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;time by time the program hangs up and show a pop up that saids:&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; The program do an ilegal operation&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Send Report to Microsoft (button)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I cant belive it my program sending mails to MS.. this are problem in the framework right ???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway .... good news&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>VS 2005 SP1 Beta Released today</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772950</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:35:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772950</guid><dc:creator>Alastair Waddell - it's all happening</dc:creator><description>Read more at Somasegar's blog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Alastai...</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta, Windows Vista and ASLR</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772955</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:39:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772955</guid><dc:creator>Michael Howard's Web Log</dc:creator><description>Today the Visual Studio 2005 team released Service Pack 1 Beta. Included in the beta is the new linker...</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#772995</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:10:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772995</guid><dc:creator>.Avery Blog</dc:creator><description>Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta</description></item><item><title>Bry&amp;#8217;s Blog  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Visual Studio 2005 SP1 and Team Foundation Server SP1 betas have arrived</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773005</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:20:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773005</guid><dc:creator>Bry’s Blog  » Blog Archive   » Visual Studio 2005 SP1 and Team Foundation Server SP1 betas have arrived</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bryanandnoel.hintonweb.com/blog/2006/09/26/visual-studio-2005-sp1-and-team-foundation-server-sp1-betas-have-arrived/"&gt;http://bryanandnoel.hintonweb.com/blog/2006/09/26/visual-studio-2005-sp1-and-team-foundation-server-sp1-betas-have-arrived/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>VS 2005 SP1 Beta : Available Now</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773079</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:33:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773079</guid><dc:creator>frankarr - an aussie microsoft blogger</dc:creator><description>One of the recurring questions I got at TechEd, was when will we be releasing the Service Pack for Visual...</description></item><item><title>newsBreaks.net &amp;raquo; Microsoft: Vista won&amp;#8217;t support older Visual Studio versions</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773132</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:46:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773132</guid><dc:creator>newsBreaks.net » Microsoft: Vista won’t support older Visual Studio versions</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://newsbreaks.net/archives/8251"&gt;http://newsbreaks.net/archives/8251&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>You Beta Connect</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773166</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:20:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773166</guid><dc:creator>Fashionably Late - an ADC tale</dc:creator><description>I'm contractually obligated (the support guy) to let you know that SP1 *beta* for Visual Studio 2005...</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Betaでました。</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773178</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:30:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773178</guid><dc:creator>中の技術日誌ブログ</dc:creator><description>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Betaでました。</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta  / TFS SP1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773226</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:32:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773226</guid><dc:creator>MrDave's (David Yack) Blog!</dc:creator><description>Big news today was the release of beta&amp;amp;amp;rsquo;s of a couple of key items.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; Both of these are very...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773245</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:51:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773245</guid><dc:creator>me</dc:creator><description>Thank you for the update.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have been waiting a long time for SP1.&lt;br&gt;VS2005 was so buggy that I decided to wait until SP1 was released. That will essentially be the real release date for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not concerned about Vista compatability at this time.&lt;br&gt;I'm waiting for Vista SP1 first, so you will have time to resolve those issues.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>VS2005 SP1 베타와 VS2005의 비스타 지원</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773301</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:06:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773301</guid><dc:creator>bkchung's WebLog</dc:creator><description>Somasegar's WebLog Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista 오늘 VS2005 SP1 베타 공개와...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773320</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:28:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773320</guid><dc:creator>Sarath</dc:creator><description>Why a beta release of Service Pack?</description></item><item><title>The Truth About Visual Studio Support on Windows Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773380</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:26:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773380</guid><dc:creator>Robert McLaws: FunWithCoding.NET - Windows Vista Edition</dc:creator><description>I was briefed earlier today on Visual Studio support on Windows Vista, and I wanted to clear the air......</description></item><item><title>The Truth About Visual Studio Support on Windows Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773381</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:27:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773381</guid><dc:creator>Robert McLaws: FunWithCoding.NET - Windows Vista Edition</dc:creator><description>I was briefed earlier today on Visual Studio support on Windows Vista, and I wanted to clear the air......</description></item><item><title>Le service pack 1 de Visual Studio 2005 en version beta est disponible en t&amp;amp;#233;l&amp;amp;#233;chargement gratuit sur le site Connect</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773413</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:11:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773413</guid><dc:creator>Pascal Belaud</dc:creator><description>S. Somasegar, le patron de la division d&amp;amp;#233;veloppeur &amp;amp;#224; Redmond vient d'annoncer la disponibilit&amp;amp;#233; du&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;service...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773433</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:46:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773433</guid><dc:creator>ping pong</dc:creator><description>VS.Net 2003 not supported? This is beyond the belief. Or maybe not, after seeing the quality of 2005 edition.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What about the eVC IDEs?</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773441</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:56:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773441</guid><dc:creator>ping pong</dc:creator><description>One more thing: it feels like developer division - like the OS division before - felt victim of marketing hype surrounding .NET. Somehow you started to believe that using managed code will yield better software faster. During 6 years since .NET was wrapped off, we had the Longhorn fiasco, and now this. Since the 6.0 IDE will be supported, the only reason for lack of VS.Net 2003 support is the fact that it contains managed components.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773507</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:24:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773507</guid><dc:creator>Robert McLaws</dc:creator><description>Ping pong, Managed code is not the reason why VS2003 can't be supported. In fact, VS2003 is mostly unmanaged code. VS2005 has significantly more managed code than 2003.</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773541</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:12:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773541</guid><dc:creator>Dwayne J. Baldwin</dc:creator><description>The first thing you folks on Visual Studio 2005 team can do is release SP1 that is NOT beta. Next you can start working on SP2 (to be released in 3-4 months) that will work with Vista.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is a complete joke when you just released SP1 for VS2003, then you announce .NET 3.0 and now you tell us VS2003 won't work with Vista. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most of us VS2005 supporters are still waiting to simply compile large projects. Web Site Projects (WSP) and Web Application Projects (WAP) are just other examples of incompetence when all you have to do is listen to Visual Studio developers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the trivial effort to release SP1 beta. If you want to win the next election you had better get your act together soon. Java is written all over this fiasco of versions.</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio .NET 2003 not supported on Windows Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773572</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:44:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773572</guid><dc:creator>Gabriel Lozano-Morán - The .NET Aficionado</dc:creator><description>Somasegar posted some details on his blog concerning Vista support for different versions of the Visual</description></item><item><title>Vista can't run VS.NET 2003</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773580</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:56:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773580</guid><dc:creator>Karl Seguin [MVP]</dc:creator><description>I&amp;amp;amp;#39;m going to jump on the &amp;amp;amp;quot;I&amp;amp;amp;#39;m outraged&amp;amp;amp;quot; bandwagon and blog my disappointment, yet again,</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773611</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:26:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773611</guid><dc:creator>Wilson Loo</dc:creator><description>I really think this is quite unacceptable for a software giant like Microsoft. I truly understand Microsoft's point about Vista's features - Aero, UAC, etc... but not having backward-compatibility for developers is akin to Java's long-standing incompatibility between their JDK versions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Visual Studio .NET 2003 is a product that was out 2+ years ago. Many of our customers, partners and vendors still rely on it. Not supporting VS 2003 and/or .NET 1.1 is harshly forcing everyone to upgrade to 2005 version. Many IT Departments and CTOs are unable to justify the upgrade in such a short span of time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Visual Studio .NET 2003, being such a relatively new release is still under the full support cycle which means Microsoft should honour its commitment to the future of the technology. While having an &amp;quot;ideal case&amp;quot; would be good where everyone is on Vista, running with Aero support, having UAC control, etc... this is not the case in real world. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I certainly hope Microsoft will review this decision.</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773642</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:46:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773642</guid><dc:creator>KG2V</dc:creator><description>Great move Microsoft. &amp;nbsp;I've been a developer with Microsoft products since the early 1990s, and started using Windows with Windows 286&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Moves like this are why I'm seriously hoping that someone comes up with a good RAD tool for Linux, so I can leave this behind.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Used to hate Linux - but it's these bone-headed moves that make me see that we must have some real choice</description></item><item><title>Vista will NOT support Developers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773675</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:06:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773675</guid><dc:creator>Paul Wilson's .NET Blog</dc:creator><description>So first most of the meat was taken out of Vista, and the best of what remains (the poorly named .NET</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 *BETA* program</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773693</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:17:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773693</guid><dc:creator>Greg Postlewait</dc:creator><description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Follow the link to the Microsoft Connect...</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 en support onder Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773697</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:20:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773697</guid><dc:creator>Todotnet Blog</dc:creator><description>De Corporate Vice President, Developer Division, S. &amp;amp;quot;Soma&amp;amp;quot; Somasegar heeft op zijn weblog de komst van</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773706</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:30:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773706</guid><dc:creator>ping pong</dc:creator><description>Interscape, so what actually makes VB6 (released in 1998) run on Vista, while VS2003 is left behind?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To Microsoft: maybe you should stop worrying about Orcas and next releases, because your installed base is going to shrink significantly if you don't support previous IDEs on Vista. Given your recent history, fluff like &amp;quot;we're going to focus on delivering great experience with [insert codename here]&amp;quot; doesn't cut it anymore.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vista and Visual Studio Issues</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773713</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:36:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773713</guid><dc:creator>Tim Weaver</dc:creator><description>It looks like Visual Studio 2005 and Vista will not be fully compatible. In addition VS 2003 will not...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773714</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:37:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773714</guid><dc:creator>Andy B</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot; However, we will not support Visual Studio .NET 2002 or Visual Studio .NET 2003 as development environments on Windows Vista.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That sucks. Big time!&lt;br&gt;But I guess you know that, already, don't you?</description></item><item><title>Microsoft needs to show a little respect to developers (Visual Studio 2005 SP 1 BETA)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773716</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:37:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773716</guid><dc:creator>Eric Bowen's .NET Technology Blog</dc:creator><description>Why does it take Microsoft longer to release a service pack than it take most companies to release a...</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta - getting closer</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773717</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:39:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773717</guid><dc:creator>Curtis Swartzentruber</dc:creator><description>Soma announced today that beta 1 of Visual Studio 2005 SP1 is out. &amp;nbsp;Looking forward to this, although...</description></item><item><title>פיתוח בויסטה</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773779</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:31:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773779</guid><dc:creator>חוויות של מתכנת (צעיר) ב .NET, ולא רק</dc:creator><description>ברגעים אלה, קראתי את מה שנכתב במספר בלוגים [לינקים שונים] לגבי התמיכה של כלי פיתוח ב Windows Vista. בסופו...</description></item><item><title>
			MarkFletcher.org - Visual Studio Support in Vista (aka Ehhhh??? WTFBBQKTHXBYE!)
			</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773798</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:44:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773798</guid><dc:creator>
			MarkFletcher.org - Visual Studio Support in Vista (aka Ehhhh??? WTFBBQKTHXBYE!)
			</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.markfletcher.org/blog/PermaLink,guid,f8b8e672-8f9e-4cde-906e-314918256e74.aspx"&gt;http://www.markfletcher.org/blog/PermaLink,guid,f8b8e672-8f9e-4cde-906e-314918256e74.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773833</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:05:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773833</guid><dc:creator>Halo_Four</dc:creator><description>I'm sorry; this is completely and totally unacceptable. &amp;nbsp;If you're telling me that a major fundamental Microsoft product slated to be released in a matter of months can't execute other fundamental Microsoft products then you have a serious, serious problem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it is to be the case then Vista shouldn't be delayed; it should be scrapped entirely. &amp;nbsp;Honestly, way too much time was taken and the product is beyond underwhelming. &amp;nbsp;If on top of that it is incapable of running first-party applications which are still well within their product support lifecycle then the OS is totally useless and will shape up to be the next Windows Millennium Edition, and if you don't understand how much of an insult that is intended to be then you have a serious disconnect from reality. &amp;nbsp;Moreso, what does that mean for third-party applications?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Microsoft products, which I generally prefer, are popular for two reasons: &amp;nbsp;general support for a wide array of current and legacy software, and wide support for the development community. &amp;nbsp;In one fell swoop Microsoft is proposing to stop both. &amp;nbsp;This is a lose/lose situation for all of those who are involved.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And no, I'm not some anti-Microsoft zealot. &amp;nbsp;I do not have an account on Slashdot. &amp;nbsp;I am writing this on my primary development machine which has four different versions of Visual Studio installed on it simultaneously. &amp;nbsp;I am surrounded by five machines all running Windows exclusively. &amp;nbsp;My many cases of DVDs for my MSDN Team Edition for Software Developers are sitting in the bookshelf behind me. &amp;nbsp;I am an operator on several IRC channels on the Eris Free Network related to Microsoft technologies. &amp;nbsp;I am an apologist in every sense of the word and openly defend Microsoft even in the most ridiculous of circumstances. &amp;nbsp;But these actions are indefensible and actively threaten my livelihood, which is currently dependent on the ability of my company to develop and support our products based on Microsoft platforms dating back to the ancient and unsupportable times of the late 1990s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I implore you to take these issues into deep consideration and to share my rant with all those who have the slightest amount of influence. &amp;nbsp;The success of a great many companies rests on the Microsoft platform. &amp;nbsp;Instability of the offerings of that platform is not an option.</description></item><item><title>CE 6.0: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta Available for Download</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773859</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:20:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773859</guid><dc:creator>Mikehall's Embedded WEblog</dc:creator><description>Somasegar's MSDN Blog&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;has details for the Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta download (available from the...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773884</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:34:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773884</guid><dc:creator>Halo_Four</dc:creator><description>P.S. &amp;nbsp;I'd just like to add that it is my opinion that if Visual Studio 2005 requires a service pack and the previous versions of Visual Studio become unsupported then it is an egregious failing on the part of the Operating Systems division at Microsoft. &amp;nbsp;There is absolutely no reason that the new operating system cannot support all previous applications save those which rely on explicitly insecure legacy, and if recent Microsoft products also fit into that category then we have an even bigger problem than I had originally thought.</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773893</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:39:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773893</guid><dc:creator>TSchissler</dc:creator><description>So to all critics abov, I'd like to mention, that I don't agree with you. The only reason for me using VS 2003 is if you have old projects and you don't want to migrate them to VS 2005 (which you should consider). For every other case I can't understand anybody still using VS 2003, VS 2005 is so much more productive. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And who forces you to use vista? If you use a old Development envirionment why not using XP for a while? I plan to continue using Xp on my production machine for the next vew month even I use VS 2005.</description></item><item><title>artiso Blog - Beta-Version von VS 2005 SP1 und Vista-Support</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773900</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:42:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773900</guid><dc:creator>artiso Blog - Beta-Version von VS 2005 SP1 und Vista-Support</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.artiso.com/ProBlog/PermaLink,guid,2a5474de-0a49-4e96-99e5-50a2f94840e6.aspx"&gt;http://www.artiso.com/ProBlog/PermaLink,guid,2a5474de-0a49-4e96-99e5-50a2f94840e6.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773912</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:50:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773912</guid><dc:creator>Hello</dc:creator><description>One thing solves all: start-run secpol.msc and just remove the crap they call UAC. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've got everything, including VC 6.0, VS 2002, VS 2003, and VS 2005 all running side-by-side on Vista RC1. &amp;nbsp;I've even got the Vista SDK running with VC 6.0, something they said was impossible. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Developers do not need UAC. Period.</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773914</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:51:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773914</guid><dc:creator>ping pong</dc:creator><description>@TSchissler:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We provide compiled binaries for use with different versions of Visual Studio (I have VC6, VS 2003, VS 2005, eVC3 and eVC4 installed). As long as our customers do not migrate to bug-ridden VS 2005, switching is not an option (and I hate to tell you that VS 2005 adoption rate among them is rather low). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nobody forces us to use Vista, and as a matter of fact we won't use it as long as MS doesn't provide support for IDEs (which probably means never.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And no, we don't care much for managed code.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; For every other case I can't understand anybody &lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; still using VS 2003, VS 2005 is so much more &lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; productive. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yep, especially when it hangs or crashes.</description></item><item><title>Window's Vista is no good for the Developer!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#773979</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:36:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773979</guid><dc:creator>Chris Love's Official Blog - Professional ASP.NET</dc:creator><description>The Good News is that we have Service Pack 1 for Visual Studio available in Beta (so you are on your own with that :&amp;amp;gt;). &amp;nbsp;The bad news is that Visual Studio 2005 will only work, and then with specific problems. &amp;nbsp;Somasegar expalins this a little bit</description></item><item><title>Developing Windows Mobile apps on Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774092</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:08:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774092</guid><dc:creator>Windows Mobile Team Blog</dc:creator><description> &amp;nbsp;There was an announcement made this week about Visual Studio 2005 SP1 and support for Vista. In a nutshell,...</description></item><item><title>Developing Windows Mobile apps on Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774095</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:09:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774095</guid><dc:creator>MelSam's Blog</dc:creator><description> &amp;nbsp;There was an announcement made this week about Visual Studio 2005 SP1 and support for Vista. In a nutshell,...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774122</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:23:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774122</guid><dc:creator>Mike Dimmick</dc:creator><description>TSchissler:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Upgrading a project to a different development environment and different compilers is an extensive and _expensive_ process requiring full revalidation of all software. We are (primarily) a contract development company, with six developers. We give fixed-price quotes to our customers, and you can believe that they will either postpone or cancel the work, or find a different contractor, if the quote is inflated by having to change tools. It's a case of reducing the risk.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At work I have seven different C/C++ compilers installed: Microsoft C 6.0, Visual C++ 1.52, eVC 3.0, eVC 4.0, Visual Studio 6.0, Visual Studio .NET 2003 and Visual Studio 2005. I need all of these tools: C 6.0 and Visual C++ 1.52 for DOS development for Symbol Series 3000 (to support existing applications), eVC 3.0 for Pocket PC 2002 deployments, eVC 4.0 for Windows CE (Symbol MC3000 mainly) and Pocket PC 2003 deployments, VS 6.0 for desktop components (especially our application server, written in VB 6, and based entirely on COM plugins so don't think of suggesting an upgrade to .NET), and VS 2003 and 2005 for some C++ and .NET desktop components and .NET Compact Framework, 1.0 and 2.0 applications.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All these tools must continue to work in order for my company to upgrade to Vista. This decision prevents that upgrade.</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774160</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:37:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774160</guid><dc:creator>Esteban Pacheco</dc:creator><description>Guys, have you heard about Delphi? (or C#, C++, the DTG way)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We can compile form WIN32 to .Net with very few changes, our previous and new delphi versions work with almost no issues in Vista.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Backwards compatilibity had been and IS for Delphi a MAJOR concern, we will burn alive Borland if they do to us what MS did with VB and VB.Net then to .Net 1.1 vs Net 2.0 &amp;nbsp;and now to VS2002 and VS2003. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Give it a shot, for free. &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.turboexplorer.com"&gt;http://www.turboexplorer.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>No Visual Studio support in Windows Vista...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774205</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:17:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774205</guid><dc:creator>Wictor Wilen</dc:creator><description>Windows Vista will be released later this year to partners and volume license customers and in the beginning of 2007 to the masses. A successful release of a software product such as Windows Vista req...</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista &amp;laquo; Systems Engineering</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774396</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:51:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774396</guid><dc:creator>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista « Systems Engineering</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://systemsengineering.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/visual-studio-2005-sp1-beta-and-visual-studio-support-for-vista/"&gt;http://systemsengineering.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/visual-studio-2005-sp1-beta-and-visual-studio-support-for-vista/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Team Foundation Server features in Service Pack 1 Beta (and Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Betas)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774422</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:10:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774422</guid><dc:creator>Robert Burke's Weblog</dc:creator><description>The Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta has just been released.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; Here's the official announcement.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;...</description></item><item><title>Techies blog  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774438</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:17:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774438</guid><dc:creator>Techies blog  » Blog Archive   » </dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://techies.teamlupus.hu/2006/09/27/274/hu/"&gt;http://techies.teamlupus.hu/2006/09/27/274/hu/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>decorus &amp;raquo; ??ldre Visual Studio k??rer ikke p?? Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774454</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:31:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774454</guid><dc:creator>decorus » ??ldre Visual Studio k??rer ikke p?? Vista</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.decorus.dk/blog/2006/09/27/aeldre-vs-koerer-ikke-i-vista/"&gt;http://www.decorus.dk/blog/2006/09/27/aeldre-vs-koerer-ikke-i-vista/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2003 Will Not Work On Vista So Neither Will I</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774484</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:55:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774484</guid><dc:creator>Tim Weaver</dc:creator><description>Soma has the details here He doesn't actually say VS 2003 will never be supported, but out of the box</description></item><item><title>VS2005 SP1 on Vista, it's not that bad</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774541</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:50:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774541</guid><dc:creator>PeterIs Ramblings</dc:creator><description>The announcement of the beta of SP1 for Vista on somasegar's blog here seems to have caused some consternation since they're saying they need a new service pack for Vista and VS2003 won't be supported.The truth is a bit more mixed than that as Scott Guth</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774555</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:01:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774555</guid><dc:creator>an ex Microsoft FAN !!</dc:creator><description>TSchissler:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;what do you said ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; For every other case I can't understand anybody &lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; still using VS 2003, VS 2005 is so much more &lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; productive. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We port a big project of more than 250.000 lines of code and the program become very unstable, and i don't talk about VS, the framework generates random errors and show a pop up to send errors to MS !!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;we are NOT MORE PRODUCTIVE WITH VS2005&lt;br&gt;WE ARE MORE PRODUCTIVE WITH VS2005&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reason: VS2005 hang ups all the time for us we are working with a big VB.NET application, with a lot of inherited forms and they don't work very well, you can see it in the kb.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The edit and continue simply don't work for us !!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;do you call it more productive ???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love .NET 1.1 I love even more .NET 2.0, but is very hard to me to see how MS is taking this problem, releasing a SP one year later, asking us to call to the support to get more than 20 hot fixes !!!&lt;br&gt;They preffer to think in the very bad new name for the WinFx and things like that !!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was a big Microsoft fun !! I fight with friend to defend the M$ position, but this is too much for me !! they simple seams to don't here any more !!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They only hear us while they want the all the delphi and Java people jump into the .NET world !!&lt;br&gt;But now they only see to the future and worry about us, they said:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wait to the the Q3 2006 we send all our all people to the WinVista team, and we can release the SP before !!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PLease Bill no go for the MS, give all your employers a lesson of customer care and satisfaction&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2002/2003 Not Supported on Windows Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774603</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:33:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774603</guid><dc:creator>Mehran Nikoo's Blog</dc:creator><description>S. Somasegar has a post on his blog about Visual Studio 2002/2003 not being supported on Windows Vista...</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Delayed, VS.NET 2003 Not Supported on Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774606</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:40:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774606</guid><dc:creator>Mehran Nikoo's Blog</dc:creator><description>S. Somasegar has a post on his blog about the delay in the release of VS 2005 SP1 (it was due in Q3 2006...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774776</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:37:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774776</guid><dc:creator>avidgator</dc:creator><description>Simply put, this will have a pretty serious chilling effect concerning the adoption of Vista for my team and our customers. &amp;nbsp;It is disturbing to hear this degree of uncertianty concerning the ability of 2.0-based applications to run successfully and without issue on Vista. &amp;nbsp;Now we either freeze our customers and their OS pruchases on XP or must plan for the possibility of patch releases merely to support the new OS. &amp;nbsp;Very disapointing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It also is a circumstance that is very difficult to reconcile with the Allchin letter you referenced in your 9/15 post. &amp;nbsp;Mr. Allchin's statement that &amp;quot;You have GOT to be ready for this opportunity&amp;quot; sounds like it is being followed by a MIcrosoft parenthetical that reads &amp;quot;because we certainly are not.&amp;quot;</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio の Windows Vista サポート</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774802</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:13:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774802</guid><dc:creator>中の技術日誌ブログ</dc:creator><description>Visual Studio の Windows Vista サポート</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774804</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:15:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774804</guid><dc:creator>Kevin Jensen</dc:creator><description>I still can't find the release notes? &amp;nbsp;Anyone have any luck?&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>??????????????????  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774895</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:42:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774895</guid><dc:creator>??????????????????  » Blog Archive   » Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.shsh.ylc.edu.tw/~taichis/wp/20060928/463"&gt;http://www.shsh.ylc.edu.tw/~taichis/wp/20060928/463&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Join the Windows XP club... for 5 more years or so</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774926</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:30:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774926</guid><dc:creator>Fear and Loathing</dc:creator><description>If you&amp;amp;amp;rsquo;re a developer today writing .NET apps, you&amp;amp;amp;rsquo;re either writing them with Visual Studio</description></item><item><title>     Nieuwe slag voor ontwikkelaars |  KennethVerburg.nl - Information Engineer in het Wild</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#774929</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:31:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774929</guid><dc:creator>     Nieuwe slag voor ontwikkelaars |  KennethVerburg.nl - Information Engineer in het Wild</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.kennethverburg.nl/2006/09/28/nieuwe-slag-voor-ontwikkelaars/"&gt;http://www.kennethverburg.nl/2006/09/28/nieuwe-slag-voor-ontwikkelaars/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775106</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:23:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775106</guid><dc:creator>Somasegar</dc:creator><description>There have been some questions on run-time compatibility. &amp;nbsp;I want to reiterate that .NET Framework 1.1 and .NET Framework 2.0 applications will continue to work as expected on Windows Vista.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- somasegar</description></item><item><title>Weblogs in distress</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775166</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:26:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775166</guid><dc:creator>Dennis' Blog</dc:creator><description>When you think hundreds of weblogs are going to blog about the new release of Windows Live Writer, Somasegar</description></item><item><title>Weblogs in distress</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775167</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:28:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775167</guid><dc:creator>Dennis' Blog</dc:creator><description>When you think hundreds of weblogs are going to blog about the new release of Windows Live Writer, Somasegar</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775169</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:29:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775169</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>I think this was told by developers to Microsoft MANY times! Stop calling WinFx as .NETFW3.0!&lt;br&gt;It's a mess when seeing Microsoft renaming and how products are versioned. It's BIG MESS and this upsets developers because this makes troubles to them when they have to explain this to their clients.&lt;br&gt;So stop to haze .net developers with this naming mess, or event your comunnity will get very agry to microsoft.</description></item><item><title>nikon@aw.de  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; yet another beta: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 beta</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775176</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:31:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775176</guid><dc:creator>nikon@aw.de  » Blog Archive   » yet another beta: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 beta</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://nikon.yokai.org/?p=59"&gt;http://nikon.yokai.org/?p=59&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Na Vistu u DEV teamu zapomeňte</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775250</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:46:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775250</guid><dc:creator>Michalův zápisníček</dc:creator><description>&amp;amp;quot;Soma&amp;amp;quot; Somasegar , Corporate Vice President Developer Division určitě mnoho lid&amp;amp;#237; sv&amp;amp;#253;m ozn&amp;amp;#225;men&amp;amp;#237;m nepotěšil.</description></item><item><title>The Truth About Visual Studio Support on Windows Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775333</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:17:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775333</guid><dc:creator>VinceX.NET's WebLog</dc:creator><description>Found on LonghornBlogs this interesting post from Robert Law...&lt;br&gt;{&lt;br&gt;I was briefed earlier today on Visual...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775398</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:14:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775398</guid><dc:creator>Dennis Ecclestone</dc:creator><description>The release notes for Visual Studio 2003 .NET SP1 (&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;924009"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;924009&lt;/a&gt;) list Windows Vista as a supported operating system. &amp;nbsp;Obviously there's not a whole lot of testing that goes into this sort of thing.</description></item><item><title>.NET Oldenburg Blog &amp;raquo; Visual Studio, .NET und Windows Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775402</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:19:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775402</guid><dc:creator>.NET Oldenburg Blog » Visual Studio, .NET und Windows Vista</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.dotnet-oldenburg.de/2006/09/28/visual-studio-net-und-windows-vista/"&gt;http://blog.dotnet-oldenburg.de/2006/09/28/visual-studio-net-und-windows-vista/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775444</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:58:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775444</guid><dc:creator>Mark Richards</dc:creator><description>I can't believe it's going to take 3-4 months to release VS2005 SP1. That just seems absolutely absurd to me, especially after waiting for so long to have some of these VS2005 annoyances resolved.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Listen, Somasegar, I mean no disrespect, but something has to change here. MS must get into a position where it can release service packs to Visual Studio within a reasonable amount of time; take smaller bites if you need to. It's difficult for me to believe that Microsoft, of all companies, cannot accelerate this time frame.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And like the others, I think the decision not to support VS2003 on Vista is a big mistake. But then I thought that calling WinFX &amp;quot;.NET 3.0&amp;quot; was a mistake, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>CP: The Truth About Visual Studio Support on Windows Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775457</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:07:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775457</guid><dc:creator>Kurbli</dc:creator><description>Found on LonghornBlogs this interesting post from Robert Law ... { I was briefed earlier today on Visual</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta Now released</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775493</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:31:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775493</guid><dc:creator>Clare Dillon's Blog</dc:creator><description>Check out Somasegar's&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;announcement on Visual Studio 2005 SP1 and Visual Studio Support for Vista.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;There...</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta Now released</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775495</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:31:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775495</guid><dc:creator>Clare Dillon's Blog</dc:creator><description>Check out Somasegar's&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;announcement on Visual Studio 2005 SP1 beta&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;and Visual Studio Support...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775522</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:50:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775522</guid><dc:creator>GuyIncognito</dc:creator><description>Scrap Vista and start over! &amp;nbsp;You guys at Microsoft have surely jumped the shark on Vista. &amp;nbsp;I'm shortly celebrating the 5th anniversary of the release of the public Vista bits without a release. &amp;nbsp;If I were in your position at my job, I surely would have been fired already. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And now the announcement that VS.NET 2003 SP1 will not run on Vista?!? &amp;nbsp;You've got to be kidding! &amp;nbsp;(Checking calendar -- Nope not April 1st...)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thankfully prices are dropping on Intel Macs. &amp;nbsp; Mass Exodus to Macs/Linux, MySQL, Rails, Java, etc?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whatever happened to Developers, Developers, Developers??? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775561</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:23:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775561</guid><dc:creator>DaveF</dc:creator><description>So after years of telling clients to upgrade their VB6 apps to .net I've now got to tell them that if they want to maintain their .net 1.1 apps on Vista, they've got to upgrade them to .net 2? (With a new, more expensive version of VS which doesn't work right on Vista yet).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or, they could just dig out the old VB6 source code, because that's supported...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice move Microsoft. Not. (dot net? or dot not?)</description></item><item><title>Support for Everyone in Windows Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775591</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:52:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775591</guid><dc:creator>Haaron Gonzalez</dc:creator><description>Somasegar's WebLog always with big announcement. He is announcing the Service Pack 1 of Visual Studio</description></item><item><title>Marauderz Stuff!! - Now This Sucks!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775708</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:10:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775708</guid><dc:creator>Marauderz Stuff!! - Now This Sucks!</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.marauderzstuff.com/PermaLink,guid,ed624078-9447-44c8-a884-797b8639658e.aspx"&gt;http://www.marauderzstuff.com/PermaLink,guid,ed624078-9447-44c8-a884-797b8639658e.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775800</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:06:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775800</guid><dc:creator>Aaron King</dc:creator><description>I downloaded it VS2005 SP1 Beta tried to install it on 3 different machines. &amp;nbsp;Tried the workarounds from the Connect forums. &amp;nbsp;Downloaded the release notes. &amp;nbsp;Tried those workarounds. &amp;nbsp;Still no go. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd love to see improvements in VS2005, I guess I'll have to wait until Beta2. &amp;nbsp;I hate being a Beta tester.</description></item><item><title>VS2005 SP, VS2002/2003 and Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775907</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:51:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775907</guid><dc:creator>Joteke's Blog</dc:creator><description>Long time no see, I&amp;amp;amp;#39;ve been very busy at work, so this is my first post for a while. Soma blogs about</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#775914</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:58:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:775914</guid><dc:creator>Douglas Reilly</dc:creator><description>Lack of support for running VS 2003 will be a show stopper for me. &amp;nbsp;I will not convert my main work PC to Vista, absent support for VS 2003 (which continues to be used by a large number of my clients).</description></item><item><title>&amp;amp;#191;Windows Vista? &amp;amp;#161;No para Desarrolladores!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776234</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776234</guid><dc:creator>SELECT * FROM Nazul.Thoughts</dc:creator><description>Ha comenzado a generar algo de noticias el post de Somasegar acerca del soporte que Microsoft tendr&amp;amp;#225;...</description></item><item><title>&amp;amp;#191;Windows Vista? &amp;amp;#161;No para Desarrolladores!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776235</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:43:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776235</guid><dc:creator>Nazul#</dc:creator><description>Ha comenzado a generar algo de noticias el post de Somasegar acerca del soporte que Microsoft tendr&amp;amp;#225;...</description></item><item><title>&amp;amp;#191;Windows Vista? &amp;amp;#161;No para Desarrolladores!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776242</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:46:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776242</guid><dc:creator>Nazul#</dc:creator><description>Al parecer el soporte de Visual Studio en Windows Vista no ser&amp;amp;#225; como se esperar&amp;amp;#237;a.</description></item><item><title>&amp;amp;#191;Windows Vista? &amp;amp;#161;No para Desarrolladores!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776243</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:46:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776243</guid><dc:creator>SELECT * FROM Nazul.Thoughts</dc:creator><description>Al parecer el soporte de Visual Studio en Windows Vista no ser&amp;amp;#225; como se esperar&amp;amp;#237;a.</description></item><item><title>&amp;amp;#191;Windows Vista? &amp;amp;#161;No para Desarrolladores!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776244</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:47:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776244</guid><dc:creator>Nazul's Weblog</dc:creator><description>Al parecer el soporte de Visual Studio en Windows Vista no ser&amp;amp;#225; como se esperar&amp;amp;#237;a.</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776260</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:07:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776260</guid><dc:creator>Jamie Clayton</dc:creator><description>I’m not sure how to interpret the following quote in the blog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Given the customer feedback that we’ve received since the launch of Visual Studio 2005 indicating the manageability of upgrading from Visual Studio .NET 2003 to Visual Studio 2005, we are focusing our efforts on ensuring VS 2005 is a great development platform for Vista.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having been through a mid size windows forms (170K lines of code) upgrade from vs2003 to vs2005 and experienced the significant pain that migration caused us. &amp;nbsp;Once your solution grows beyond a certain size the IDE slows down to a crawl on a high end Laptop that was a 5 months old. &amp;nbsp;Dare I say it, but VS2005 and Vista in combination would require significant CPU/RAM to allow a developer to operate productively. &amp;nbsp;If you really want pain, try working in a mixed DPI scenario, 120 vs 96 dpi and see how to cause a development team tears every day at code checkin/out. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our companies experience migrating VS2003 web applications to VS2005 was a total re-write to help incorporate master forms. Oh and the fact I got totally lost on where the files in a VS2005 project actually reside.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, all I can say is that we have been burnt in the past with Microsoft and upgrades, so this stands as nothing new for me. &amp;nbsp;Stay away from version 1 or 2 products from Microsoft because it generally takes them a few versions to iron out all the problems, mainly at our (developers/customers) expense.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776304</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:10:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776304</guid><dc:creator>Bruce DaCosta</dc:creator><description>The correct url location for the VS 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta release notes is below.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;------&lt;br&gt;The VS 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta Release notes can be found at the url below. &amp;nbsp;You don't have to log into the connect site to access the release notes. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/Downloads/DownloadDetails.aspx?DownloadID=3249"&gt;http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/Downloads/DownloadDetails.aspx?DownloadID=3249&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for testing the beta service pack &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bruce &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for testing the beta service pack &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bruce &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Community Convergence V</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776373</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:12:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776373</guid><dc:creator>Charlie Calvert's Community Blog</dc:creator><description>Welcome to the fifth Community Convergence update. This file is published on my blog, and shortly thereafter...</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776399</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:34:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776399</guid><dc:creator>[ punto net ]</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Microsoft ha liberado el Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 (SP1) Beta, el cual incorpora los 'fixes'...</description></item><item><title /><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776401</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:36:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776401</guid><dc:creator>[ punto net ]</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Microsoft ha liberado el Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 (SP1) Beta, el cual incorpora los 'fixes'...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776764</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:05:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776764</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>Are you kidding???????????????? Microsoft! You're getting me crazy! I'll start to move to LAMP because you are doing very bad job!!!&lt;br&gt;So we should move back to VB6 or what?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can't mean this seriously! Stop kidding on DevDays and start working on development of products and listen to your clients!&lt;br&gt;Or then die Microsoft and developers, developers, developers will move to LAMP!!!!!</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776801</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:01:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776801</guid><dc:creator>Amit Bahree</dc:creator><description>Somasegar,&lt;br&gt;I was wondering if you are going to respond to any of the questions / comments here? It would be nice to get Microsoft's thoughts and issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Given there are many people quite passionate about this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyone listening (from MS)????&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776810</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:17:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776810</guid><dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator><description>Why do I have to install an ActiveX control just to download the freakin **release notes**.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeepers get a grip guys!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's face it, the only reason this beta was released is so that MS could claim it met the &amp;quot;Q3 for VS2005 service pack&amp;quot; deadline.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hate being this cynical, but when I have to install yet another piece of activeX crap just to read a document I really do think someone at MS has lost the plot completely.</description></item><item><title>Who will be the dot in Web 2.0?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776911</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:46:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776911</guid><dc:creator>The Alistair Speirs blog</dc:creator><description>Jonathan Schwarz thinks it will be sun (after being the dot in dot com, the java in the web designers...</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776968</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:03:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776968</guid><dc:creator>Somasegar</dc:creator><description>I appreciate the amount of feedback on this topic and want to provide a little bit more background on why we made some of the decisions that we did. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Development tools as a whole have requirements that are not a part of normal applications. &amp;nbsp;Some of the things developer tools expect to do are also the types of things that malicious code tries to perform on a user machine. &amp;nbsp;As you all know, the Windows team has continued to make great progress w/Vista on the security front. &amp;nbsp;There are a number of new security related work and features that are a part of Windows Vista. &amp;nbsp;In the case of Visual Studio, things like debugging while attaching to a process requires reading and modifying that process’ memory, or registering a COM component directly conflict with the principles behind some of the new security features in Windows Vista.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I’ve also clearly heard the concern around our decision not to support VS.NET 2003. &amp;nbsp;We know from talking to customers that some of them have been successful in using VS.NET 2003 and VS2005 on Windows Vista when running as an administrator on the machine. &amp;nbsp;However, there are some scenarios, like those I described above, that will not work. Going forward, we will provide more details on what these issues are and any known workarounds that you can use. &amp;nbsp;Also, when we have fixes to workaround some of these problems, we will make them available. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One other thing that I want to reiterate is that existing and future .NET Framework 1.1 and 2.0 applications will continue to work on Windows Vista. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can check the Visual Studio on Windows Vista support page for more information and further announcements at &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/support/windowsvista/"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/support/windowsvista/&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brian Harry of the Team Foundation Server team has a blog entry related to this - &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- somasegar &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#776980</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:10:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:776980</guid><dc:creator>Somasegar</dc:creator><description>Amit,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do want to provide a detail list of issues and any workarounds that we know of to customers. &amp;nbsp;We have a team working on this as we speak and we will be publish more specific information soon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- somasegar</description></item><item><title>
.mark.net &amp;raquo; Vista non supporta gli sviluppatori</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#777025</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:03:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:777025</guid><dc:creator>
.mark.net » Vista non supporta gli sviluppatori</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.dotmark.net/?p=455"&gt;http://blog.dotmark.net/?p=455&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Lazycoder &amp;raquo; Vista will only support VS 2005</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#777061</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:33:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:777061</guid><dc:creator>Lazycoder » Vista will only support VS 2005</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/index.php/archives/2006/09/29/vista-will-only-support-vs-2005/"&gt;http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/index.php/archives/2006/09/29/vista-will-only-support-vs-2005/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>No Vista for me</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#777074</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:39:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:777074</guid><dc:creator>Coding Sanity</dc:creator><description>I just cannot stress how upset I am with the Visual Studio team. Since VS2005 was released, developers</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#777376</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:55:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:777376</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Young</dc:creator><description>What about component developers who need to run Visual Studio 2002, 2003 and 2005 simultaneously? &amp;nbsp;Will we be expected to run multiple PCs or worse, resort to virtualization?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This decision will also prevent our office from upgrading to Vista until all of our customers have completely upgraded to .NET 2.0. &amp;nbsp;Which is going to be a very long time.</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#777439</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:12:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:777439</guid><dc:creator>David Berg</dc:creator><description>For those people with performance problems in VS 2005, we'd like to help. &amp;nbsp;If you can, please start by downloading SP1. &amp;nbsp;We've fixed a number of performance problems, and we'd like to know if we've fixed your problem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you're still having performance problems with VS 2005, please drop me a note at DevPerf@Microsoft.com. &amp;nbsp;Let me know about how big your solution is (# projects, # files, size of files), and what language and type of applications you're developing. &amp;nbsp;Most importantly, if you can give me specific steps to reproduce the problem, and quantify how bad it is, that would be a great help.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dave Berg&lt;br&gt;Microsoft Developer Division, Performance Engineering Team</description></item><item><title>Windows Vista won't support Visual Studio .NET 2003</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#778144</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:08:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:778144</guid><dc:creator>More Wally - Wallace B. McClure</dc:creator><description>Ok, so now we know that Windows Vista won't support VisualStudio .NET 2003.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; Its interesting that...</description></item><item><title>Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life - RSS Bandit [Jubilee Release] Status Update</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#778182</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:03:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:778182</guid><dc:creator>Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life - RSS Bandit [Jubilee Release] Status Update</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=8ff23c4d-e335-45c2-97c3-fe125205aef3"&gt;http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=8ff23c4d-e335-45c2-97c3-fe125205aef3&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta Release</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#778240</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:33:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:778240</guid><dc:creator>Alpha's Blog</dc:creator><description>[From Somasegar's WebLog ] &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx&lt;/a&gt; Visual Studio</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#778354</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:11:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:778354</guid><dc:creator>Miguel de Leon</dc:creator><description>Somebody can to do a good &amp;nbsp;alternative Operating System?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No Vista ,&amp;quot;Blind&amp;quot;, no .Net ,no .Java....... </description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#778560</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:45:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:778560</guid><dc:creator>stefan wenig</dc:creator><description>I understand that old development tools have troubles integration with the new security model of Vista, and I also understand that it would be a major effort to adapt and test the VS.NET 2003 code to support it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, given the investments Microsoft partners have made into .NET 1.1, and given Microsofts commitment via its product life cycle, I really think MS should take the pain and provide a service pack of VS.NET 2003 at least that runs on Vista.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A better alternative event would be to provide a VS 2005 service pack that can target .NET 1.1 too. The tight coupling of VS and .NET versions is a pain anyway, and it's a problem that more componentized environments don't have. I bet a lot of people would love that feature, and given the pressure that not supporting VS.NET 2003 creates, this might just be the time to justify this investment. After all, developers are probably the last people on earth MS would want to not migrate to Vista, right?</description></item><item><title>Naik&amp;#8217;s News &amp;raquo; Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista (Somasegar/Somasegar&amp;#8217;s WebLog)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#778882</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 05:04:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:778882</guid><dc:creator>Naik’s News » Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista (Somasegar/Somasegar’s WebLog)</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://news.naikmichel.com/2006/09/26/visual-studio-2005-sp1-beta-and-visual-studio-support-for-vista-somasegarsomasegars-weblog/"&gt;http://news.naikmichel.com/2006/09/26/visual-studio-2005-sp1-beta-and-visual-studio-support-for-vista-somasegarsomasegars-weblog/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vista en .net ontwikkeltools</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#779278</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 12:40:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:779278</guid><dc:creator>Dennis' avonturen in .net</dc:creator><description>Voordat je verder leest, lees eerst eens dit artikel van Somasegar. Ik wacht wel even... &amp;amp;amp;nbsp; Goed....</description></item><item><title>Windows Vista Blog - Alles rund um Windows Vista &amp;raquo; Keine Unterst??tzung f??r ??ltere Visual Studio-Versionen unter Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#779448</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:52:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:779448</guid><dc:creator>Windows Vista Blog - Alles rund um Windows Vista » Keine Unterst??tzung f??r ??ltere Visual Studio-Versionen unter Vista</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.vista-blog.de/software/keine-unterstuetzung-fuer-aeltere-visual-studio-versionen-unter-vista/"&gt;http://www.vista-blog.de/software/keine-unterstuetzung-fuer-aeltere-visual-studio-versionen-unter-vista/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Vista won't support VS 2003 and availability of VS2005 SP1 beta</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#779459</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 17:07:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:779459</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Connell [MVP MCMS]</dc:creator><description>Vista won't support VS 2003 and availability of VS2005 SP1 beta</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#779800</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:11:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:779800</guid><dc:creator>Dan McKinley</dc:creator><description>So now you're claiming that the VB6 IDE works on Windows XP? (Sorry, that's a cheapshot.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Frankly, I think this is obscene. I think I need to wait until I've calmed down considerably to comment on this in full.</description></item><item><title>The Truth About Visual Studio Support on Windows Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#779807</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:22:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:779807</guid><dc:creator>Robert McLaws: Windows Vista Edition</dc:creator><description>I was briefed earlier today on Visual Studio support on Windows Vista , and I wanted to clear the air...</description></item><item><title>Is Backward Compatibility Holding Microsoft Back</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#780190</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 04:51:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:780190</guid><dc:creator>you've been HAACKED</dc:creator><description>Is Backward Compatibility Holding Microsoft Back</description></item><item><title>deedee.brainstream.net - Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Betas</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#780643</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:09:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:780643</guid><dc:creator>deedee.brainstream.net - Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Betas</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://deedee.brainstream.net/VisualStudio2005SP1Betas.aspx"&gt;http://deedee.brainstream.net/VisualStudio2005SP1Betas.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#780975</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:32:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:780975</guid><dc:creator>Karl E. Peterson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Soma, where you say:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Previously we announced our support for ensuring the Visual Basic 6.0 runtime and IDE on Windows Vista and we are on track for delivering that support. &amp;lt;&amp;lt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The link on the word &amp;quot;support&amp;quot; 404s! &amp;nbsp;What are you _really_ trying to say, there, hmmmm? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#781144</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:35:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:781144</guid><dc:creator>DotNetDev</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Visual Studio 2005 SP1 will run on Vista but will likely have a few compatibility issues. We are working with the Vista team to understand those&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. So Vista's been in development for over 5 years and a few weeks before RTM you're working with the OS team to &amp;quot;understand&amp;quot; the compatability issues?? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Given the customer feedback that we’ve received since the launch of Visual Studio 2005 indicating the manageability of upgrading from Visual Studio .NET 2003 to Visual Studio 2005, we are focusing our efforts on ensuring VS 2005 is a great development platform for Vista.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. And didn't anyone at MS notice that the lack of support for VS2003 may upset a significant number of your developer/customers? &amp;nbsp;Did you actually solicit any feedback from customers regarding this issue? &amp;nbsp;One has to always wonder where are you getting that &amp;quot;customer feedback&amp;quot; that you always claim to be driving your decisions.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#781613</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:44:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:781613</guid><dc:creator>Rob Paulson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Relax guys - the sky is 'not' falling...I haven't read all of the comments, so I appologize if someone has explained this already - but...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vista has that niffty (or not so niffty) feature called UAC - User Access Control. &amp;nbsp;Remember, Windows is targeted at the masses; and UAC is going to help people like my Mom avoid 'bad' software/spyware/malware/whateverware.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you are the kind of person that knows what Visual Studio is, you are most likely not the kind of person who will benefit from UAC. &amp;nbsp;In fact, every developer I've talked to about Vista agrees that the first thing you should do after installing Vista is disable UAC.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would Tony Hawk keep the training wheels on his new bike? &amp;nbsp;Nope.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you disable UAC - Visual Studio 2003 works great. &amp;nbsp;Visual Studio 2005 works great.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the future, MS will release a patch for VS 2005 that will let it run on Vista *with* UAC on. &amp;nbsp;MS is not going to release a patch for VS 2003. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What that means to you, the developer is that, to use Visual Studio 2003 you can do any of the following...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1.) &amp;nbsp;Disable UAC on Vista.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2.) &amp;nbsp;Continue to run XP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3.) &amp;nbsp;Run Vista, but execute Visual Studio 2003 from a virtual machine running XP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'd recommend #1.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#781653</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:58:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:781653</guid><dc:creator>Vellore "Vetri" Vetrivelkumaran</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is another link to the support statement for VB6 IDE on Vista: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vbrun/ms788708.aspx"&gt;http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vbrun/ms788708.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Vista Compatability Pickle</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#781935</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:37:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:781935</guid><dc:creator>Jonathan Bruce's WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The ServerSide.NET reports a worrying story that has started late last week, but caught my attention earlier this morning. The route of the article stems from this blog, as filed by a Microsoft VP annoucning that almost a year after...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#784654</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:47:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:784654</guid><dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great that you have access to the Vista team, for the rest of us it is really a pain to make our software compatible to Vista. So thanks Microsoft for all the extra work!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;We are working with the Vista team to understand those, to provide workarounds where possible and also work on providing you with a set of fixes beyond SP1&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#784764</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:36:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:784764</guid><dc:creator>stefan wenig</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Rob Paulson:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;somasegar's post from friday 11:03 makes that all sound not quite as straightforward. VS 2003 and 2005 might have worked for _you_ with UAC disabled. but you might experience additional problems once you use certain features. if MS came out with a statement that says everything was tested and works fine with UAC disabled, i'd agree with you, but that hasn't happened so far.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#784861</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:15:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:784861</guid><dc:creator>Olivier Fermy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The url for VS 2005 SP1 Beta Release Notes returns a page not found Error :&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/Downloads/DownloadDetails.aspx?DownloadID=3249"&gt;http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/Downloads/DownloadDetails.aspx?DownloadID=3249&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you tell me where i can download the release notes ?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#786282</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 20:02:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:786282</guid><dc:creator>Some VS2003 user</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Huh? What's this? You'll support VB 6.0 on Vista (even the IDE) and VS2005 but not VS2003? How does that happen? I thought .NET was exactly about shielding the developper away from the hassles of directly using Win32 by introducing a virtual machine? Doesn't .NET 1.1 run un Visa or why won't VS2003 work there? Or is it simply: It may work, but if it doesn't don't bother to contact our support, because we'd ignore these issues anyway?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#787852</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:18:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:787852</guid><dc:creator>another user</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Some VS2003 user: VS is primarily unmanaged code, and a lot of that code is very low-level. others have explained this here, and somasegar himself has pointed out repeatedly that there are no problems with the .net runtime on vista in any version.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio Compatibility and Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#787963</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:22:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:787963</guid><dc:creator>Steve Caravajal's Ramblings</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Somasegar blogged last week about the availability of a beta release of SP1 for Visual Studio 2005 so&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Blog de AlejoLp &amp;raquo; Microsoft Cautions Developers About Visual Studio/Vista Conflicts</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#788017</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:48:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:788017</guid><dc:creator>Blog de AlejoLp » Microsoft Cautions Developers About Visual Studio/Vista Conflicts</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.alejolp.com/blog/?p=68"&gt;http://www.alejolp.com/blog/?p=68&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#788133</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:49:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:788133</guid><dc:creator>MarkN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft should at least officially support VS2003 on Vista with UAC disabled.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#788349</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:51:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:788349</guid><dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Still another 3-4 months for the release, this is lame. &amp;nbsp;Their are many show stopping bugs in 05, how is a developer suppose to do a release if 05 doesn't get fixed until 07.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#791093</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:28:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:791093</guid><dc:creator>Some VS2003 user  </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, VS may indeed be unmanaged code, but one thing is really better with the Borland brand of products: you can compily ANY code from previous versions with the latest without much hassle if you don't use 3rd party addons or if you have the correct verisions of them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As it seems VS2005 can't do .NET V1.1 applications anymore? Am I right? If yes, why? Why always forcing the developper to upgrade? It seems several billion dollars profit every year is not enough... (at least for some)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#791096</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:30:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:791096</guid><dc:creator>Some VS2003 user  </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay I stand a bit corrected: with a MS addon you can compile for NET1.1 with VS2005, but why not out of the box?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#791371</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:13:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:791371</guid><dc:creator>Magnus</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have tried to wait and calm down before writing a comment on this, but I have to realise I will not calm down on this issue. I must say that MS has made a very bad decision here. Vista is so late, several of the main features has been removed still there won't be a .NET develoment environment that work without problems on it (as I understand not even 2005 with SP1 will work without problems). I don't know which studio version that is most common today, but most of those I talk to still do most of the work with VS 2003. VS 2005 is only used if is really necesary to develop for .NET 2.0, otherwise many prefer 1.1 (or actually VS 2003).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Somaseger says several times that .NET 1.1 applications will run on Vista. I assume that he never installed .NET 1.1 on Vista. Since it for some reason that I don't understand the 1.1 framework is not included in Vista. When installing it you get a warning about compatibility issues. So from my point of view I can not say to my customers that my 1.1 applications work on Vista since I can not accept that my customers should see the installation warnings/errors that currently exist when installing .NET 1.1 framwork on Vista.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#791661</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:46:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:791661</guid><dc:creator>A VS2003 + VS2005 user</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The real problem of the the lack of VS 2003 support i Vista, is that Visual Slow 2005 dosnt support dev of .NET 1.x apps out of the box, but have to tweaked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When VS2002 was released on of the hypes, was the seperation of IDE and language (VB), but it seams that. NET goes hand in hand with a specific version of VS, and that really sucks!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta Now Available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#792624</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 04:08:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:792624</guid><dc:creator>Heath Stewart's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As announced on Soma's blog, Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta is available today. You can sign&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Resources for Debugging .NET</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#792732</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:49:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:792732</guid><dc:creator>geekSpeak</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Here are some great resources from our Debugging .NET geekSpeak with John Robbins. John's blog &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.wintellect.com/Weblogs/CategoryView,category,John%20Robbins.aspx"&gt;http://www.wintellect.com/Weblogs/CategoryView,category,John%20Robbins.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Blog von Kay Giza - Ankuendigung: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta und Visual Studio unter Windows Vista - http://www.Giza-Blog.de/</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#795271</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 07:39:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:795271</guid><dc:creator>Blog von Kay Giza - Ankuendigung: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta und Visual Studio unter Windows Vista - http://www.Giza-Blog.de/</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.giza-blog.de/AnkuendigungVisualStudio2005SP1BetaUndVisualStudioUnterWindowsVista.aspx"&gt;http://www.giza-blog.de/AnkuendigungVisualStudio2005SP1BetaUndVisualStudioUnterWindowsVista.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Is there a timewarp between here and redmond?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#795953</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 13:13:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:795953</guid><dc:creator>Notes from a dark corner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The reason I wonder that is because our dev teams seem to be pumping stuff out the door so fast at the&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>New Team Foundation Server features in Service Pack 1 Beta (and Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Betas)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#805980</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:805980</guid><dc:creator>Robert Burke's Weblog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta has just been released. Here's the official announcement .&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#811101</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:56:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:811101</guid><dc:creator>Siegmund Baumann</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I like VS 2005 (even though it has some performance problems) and I love C++/CLI very much. All my new projects target this development platform.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But on the other side, there is a past. I have to maintain even (machine control) applications that still run on DOS and Windows 3.1. Therefore I have a lot of different compilers installed (copied) on my primary development machine. The majority of code I have to support uses VS2002. But there is also a significant amount of code that requires Borland C++ V4.5 (more than 100 machines run software produced with this compiler). So far there was never a problem compiling under NT/Win2K/XP all this ancient software. I hope, that this will also be true for Vista (with UAC turned off and working as an administrator). Otherwise Vista is not an operating system for developers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>MS faces some VS 2005 compatiblity issues with vista &amp;laquo; TechnicalArchitectureWorx</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#811243</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:15:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:811243</guid><dc:creator>MS faces some VS 2005 compatiblity issues with vista « TechnicalArchitectureWorx</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://archworx.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/ms-faces-some-vs-2005-compatiblity-issues-with-vista/"&gt;http://archworx.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/ms-faces-some-vs-2005-compatiblity-issues-with-vista/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio support on Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#814346</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:04:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:814346</guid><dc:creator>JrzyShr Dev Guy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Via Tim ... Some important news came out recently regarding visual studio 2005 and visual studio version&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>No VS2002 or VS2003 for Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#815285</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:31:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:815285</guid><dc:creator>Rory Primrose</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This one is a couple of weeks old, but Soma has indicated that VS2002 and VS2003 will not be supported&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#815811</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:44:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:815811</guid><dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This seems to be the new rule for Microsoft and not the exception. When SQL 2005 and VS 2005 came out, Microsoft *refused* to support either with Commerce Server 2002, even though that was the latest RTM version of Commerce Server at the time. Now they are releasing a new Windows version and not supporting anything except a beta, hopefully be released, version of a SP for one of the latest development environments, and, if I noticed correctly, I get a warning about installing SQL 2005 on vista and it needing SP2 for SQL 2005...and I believe SP1 just recently came out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What happened to the old policy? Support policies were current version and 2 back. I understand they cant support everything, but it is a shame they are bowing to the mid 1990s stuck in time developers running Visual Studio 6, which is *clearly* out of the support cycle and are refusing to support VS 2003. What the hell is wrong with this place? Is this what we have expect going forward? With the new pricing structure of MSDN, it is a heck of a price to pay to get a VS IDE that is only supported for 2 years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Someone needs to bow their head in shame and get this fixed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#820881</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:57:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:820881</guid><dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There is now one more reason why it will be a long time before we deploy Vista here. Oh well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#823322</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:24:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:823322</guid><dc:creator>WillyXoft habla...</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft ha liberado el Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 (SP1) Beta, el cual incorpora los 'fixes'...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#826874</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:18:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:826874</guid><dc:creator>Oscar Calvo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am trying to access the site, it seems that its down.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>"Top Level" technologies/products not supported on Windows Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#835024</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:01:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:835024</guid><dc:creator>Eric Nelson - Development for .NET Framework 3.0 (WinFX as was) for ISVs</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We are investing a lot of time in ensuring applications that work on Windows XP will work on Windows&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Application compatibility warnings when launching Visual Studio 2005 on Windows Vista RC2</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#836112</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:55:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:836112</guid><dc:creator>Aaron Stebner's WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I installed Windows Vista RC2 a couple of weeks ago and started working on some of the remaining issues&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#841530</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:12:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:841530</guid><dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://fitness-magazine.352p6.com/"&gt;http://fitness-magazine.352p6.com/&lt;/a&gt; &amp;lt;a href=&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://fitness-magazine.352p6.com/"&gt;http://fitness-magazine.352p6.com/&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;fitness-magazine&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; [url=&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://fitness-magazine.352p6.com/"&gt;http://fitness-magazine.352p6.com/&lt;/a&gt;]fitness-magazine[/url]&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>SteveStreeting.com &amp;raquo; Microsoft: Good News / Bad News</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#843292</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:03:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:843292</guid><dc:creator>SteveStreeting.com » Microsoft: Good News / Bad News</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=403"&gt;http://www.stevestreeting.com/?p=403&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#850034</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:14:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:850034</guid><dc:creator>HL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nobody forces you to develop on Vista, like previously said you can still develop on XP and target a Vista machine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, what you will need if you want to continue to develope using VS2003 is to run Vista on a separate machine or in a virtual machine on your dev machine for testing purposes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What are you all complaining about ? You still have all the options available to you and your apps will still work on Vista.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please learn to read, and learn how to understand what you read, some of you here seem to have real problems with that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#868083</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 12:44:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:868083</guid><dc:creator>kayle</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Nobody forces you to develop on Vista, like previously said you can still develop on XP and target a Vista machine.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, what you will need if you want to continue to develope using VS2003 is to run Vista on a separate machine or in a virtual machine on your dev machine for testing purposes. (...)&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm afraid this is not enough !&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We must be able to debug programs under vista since its API implementation is not perfectly backward compliant with XP, 2000, (what else…) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is impossible to discard VS2003 so simply…&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Future Directions: Service Pack 1 Beta</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#885947</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 02:42:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:885947</guid><dc:creator>Visual Studio Team System (VSTS) Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Service Pack 1 (SP1) for Visual Studio 2005 clients and Team Foundation Server is scheduled to release&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Future Directions: Service Pack 1 Beta</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#885983</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 02:56:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:885983</guid><dc:creator>Neno Loje's Treasury</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Service Pack 1 (SP1) for Visual Studio 2005 clients and Team Foundation Server is scheduled...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>My Software Blogs  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#904303</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:16:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:904303</guid><dc:creator>My Software Blogs  » Blog Archive   » </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://mysoftwareblogs.com/107/"&gt;http://mysoftwareblogs.com/107/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>About Visual Studio 2003 on Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1024344</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:47:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1024344</guid><dc:creator>RightHand blogs</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A while ago Somasegar's blog post about MS not supporting Visual Studio 2003 on Windows Vista caused&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Webdevelopment Blog &amp;raquo; Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1041477</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 02:51:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1041477</guid><dc:creator>Webdevelopment Blog » Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://webdevelopment.gen4ik.com/2006/11/08/visual-studio-2005-service-pack-1-beta/"&gt;http://webdevelopment.gen4ik.com/2006/11/08/visual-studio-2005-service-pack-1-beta/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>VS 2005 SP1 Delayed, VS.NET 2003 Not Supported on Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1064886</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 02:39:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1064886</guid><dc:creator>Mehran Nikoo's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;S. Somasegar has a post on his blog about the delay in the release of VS 2005 SP1 (it was due in Q3 2006&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>My experiences Installing Vista at Home</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1066522</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:27:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1066522</guid><dc:creator>Mike Stall's .NET Debugging Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've upgraded my home computer from Windows XP sp2 to Vista , which you must have heard that Microsoft&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>VS 2005 on Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1076172</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:38:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1076172</guid><dc:creator>Quan To's Visual Studio 2005 Setup blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Vista's done! Finally :) For those who have tried the beta or an Release Candidate, you'll notice a few&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta, Windows Vista and ASLR</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1095677</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 00:15:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1095677</guid><dc:creator>Michael Howard's Web Log</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Today the Visual Studio 2005 team released Service Pack 1 Beta . Included in the beta is the new linker&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Video: First Impressions on the Windows Vista RTM</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1110751</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:41:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1110751</guid><dc:creator>Dan Wahlin's WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;After backing up my files (and checking things twice), I decided to install Windows Vista Ultimate last&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Vista et les développeurs</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1121129</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:10:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1121129</guid><dc:creator>Richard Clark</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Apr&amp;#232;s Vista et les jeux , voici Vista et les d&amp;#233;veloppeurs: Tout d'abord, si vous d&amp;#233;veloppez sous VS 2002&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Kinook Software Blog  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Review: Windows Vista (Application Compatibility)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1167201</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:08:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1167201</guid><dc:creator>Kinook Software Blog  » Blog Archive   » Review: Windows Vista (Application Compatibility)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.kinook.com/blog/?p=41"&gt;http://www.kinook.com/blog/?p=41&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Debugging ASP.NET applications with VS 2005 in Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1214674</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:34:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1214674</guid><dc:creator>r o b s  r e c y c l e d  b i t s</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When my laptop died a horrible NTLDR-is-missing-death I decided it was time to get into the Temple of...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Vista install virtually painless</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1296484</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:36:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1296484</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Stong</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, I installed Windows Vista as a fresh install (that is, I wasn't upgrading another Windows...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Windows Vista: Wait for SP1 (at least) &amp;laquo; Bob on Development</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1313059</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 02:11:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1313059</guid><dc:creator>Windows Vista: Wait for SP1 (at least) « Bob on Development</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bobgrommes.wordpress.com/2006/12/17/windows-vista-wait-for-sp1-at-least/"&gt;http://bobgrommes.wordpress.com/2006/12/17/windows-vista-wait-for-sp1-at-least/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Uninstall Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta before Installing the Release</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1318656</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:45:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1318656</guid><dc:creator>Heath Stewart's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Before installing the release of Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 , you must uninstall the Service Pack&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Uninstall Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Beta before Installing the Release</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1318790</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:14:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1318790</guid><dc:creator>Heath Stewart's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Before installing the release of Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 , you must uninstall the Service Pack&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>aheil.de blog - Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1331633</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:25:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1331633</guid><dc:creator>aheil.de blog - Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.aheil.de/VisualStudio2005ServicePack1.aspx"&gt;http://blog.aheil.de/VisualStudio2005ServicePack1.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio and Team Systems Service Pack Betas</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1376557</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 01:27:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1376557</guid><dc:creator>Barry Gervin's Software Architecture Perspectives</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So we have a few service packs to talk about.... Firstly, Visual Studio 2005, SP1 is now in beta testing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 on Vista for web development</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1433286</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:27:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1433286</guid><dc:creator>Notes from a dark corner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are using Vista as your web development platform with Visual Studio 2005 then the following information&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Using Visual Studio 2005 on Vista for web development</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1438616</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:14:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1438616</guid><dc:creator>Mohamed Yehia - Microsoft</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A useful list post for web development over Windows Vista (pasted below)via Doug If you are using Vista...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Vista FUD Myth #1: Visual Studio 2003 will not work on Vista.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1478991</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:28:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1478991</guid><dc:creator>AddressOf.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is not what was stated by Somasager stated , here is what he said: However, we will not support&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Vista FUD Myth #2: .NET 1.1 and 2.0 applications will not work.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1479048</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:35:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1479048</guid><dc:creator>AddressOf.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;amp;#39;m not sure how this one got started. I&amp;amp;#39;ve even seen some document out there on a major site&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>BUGBUG: poor title : Clarifying SourceSafe support on Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1512754</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:16:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1512754</guid><dc:creator>BUGBUG: poor title : Clarifying SourceSafe support on Vista</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/01/23/clarifying-sourcesafe-support-on-vista.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/richardb/archive/2007/01/23/clarifying-sourcesafe-support-on-vista.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>VS.NET &amp; Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1606742</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 01:17:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1606742</guid><dc:creator>Rob Chartier ~ Contemplation...</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have had about 5 people ask me about Visual Studio .NET 2003/2005 and Windows Vista, so I thought I&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Bob On Development &amp;raquo; Windows Vista: Wait for SP1 (at least)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1755063</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 04:18:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1755063</guid><dc:creator>Bob On Development » Windows Vista: Wait for SP1 (at least)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bobondevelopment.com/2006/12/17/windows-vista-wait-for-sp1-at-least/"&gt;http://bobondevelopment.com/2006/12/17/windows-vista-wait-for-sp1-at-least/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Born 2 Code .NET  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Visual Studio 2005 Update for Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#1816171</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:59:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1816171</guid><dc:creator>Born 2 Code .NET  » Blog Archive   » Visual Studio 2005 Update for Vista</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://born2code.net/?p=84"&gt;http://born2code.net/?p=84&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>VB6 wins as the first fully support dev platform for Vista! </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#3296754</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:18:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3296754</guid><dc:creator>The Coffeehouse</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, I Love VB6 still, so I did allow myself a little grin when I read this.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Software Installogy &amp;middot; Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Windows Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#3995063</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 07:35:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3995063</guid><dc:creator>Software Installogy · Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Windows Vista</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://devinstall.msiblog.com/2006/09/26/visual-studio-2005-sp1-beta-and-windows-vista/"&gt;http://devinstall.msiblog.com/2006/09/26/visual-studio-2005-sp1-beta-and-windows-vista/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#5462556</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:06:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5462556</guid><dc:creator>US ISV Developer Evangelism Team</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We are pleased to announce the availability of the beta of Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1. You can&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Boxing  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Somasegar&amp;#8217;s WebLog : Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#7000085</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:52:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7000085</guid><dc:creator>Boxing  » Blog Archive   » Somasegar’s WebLog : Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio …</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://boxing.247blogging.info/?p=3322"&gt;http://boxing.247blogging.info/?p=3322&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Boxing  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; US ISV Developer Evangelism Team : Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#7002899</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 11:42:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7002899</guid><dc:creator>Boxing  » Blog Archive   » US ISV Developer Evangelism Team : Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and …</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://boxing.247blogging.info/?p=3712"&gt;http://boxing.247blogging.info/?p=3712&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#8377602</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 04:21:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8377602</guid><dc:creator>Luna</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Somasegar posted some details on his blog concerning Vista support for different versions of the Visual &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Tony and Zuzana&amp;#8217;s World &amp;raquo; Celebrating the Vista Launch</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#8399045</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:37:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8399045</guid><dc:creator>Tony and Zuzana&amp;#8217;s World &amp;raquo; Celebrating the Vista Launch</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.tonysneed.com/?p=52"&gt;http://blog.tonysneed.com/?p=52&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Somasegar's WebLog : Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio support for Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#8574903</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:09:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8574903</guid><dc:creator>Weddings</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Today, I’m pleased to announce the availability of the beta of Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1. Based on your feedback, Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 addresses issues that were found through a combination of customer reports, MSDN Product Feedbac&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Ellis Web  &amp;raquo; What would Raymond Chen say?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#8866966</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:49:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8866966</guid><dc:creator>Ellis Web  &amp;raquo; What would Raymond Chen say?</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://ellisweb.net/2006/09/what-would-raymond-chen-say/"&gt;http://ellisweb.net/2006/09/what-would-raymond-chen-say/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>VB.Net Anwendung auf Windows Vista RC1 Build 5600 | hilpers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#9347633</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:58:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9347633</guid><dc:creator>VB.Net Anwendung auf Windows Vista RC1 Build 5600 | hilpers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.hilpers.com/873391-vb-net-anwendung-auf-windows"&gt;http://www.hilpers.com/873391-vb-net-anwendung-auf-windows&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Avvio VS 2005 | hilpers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#9356641</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:39:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9356641</guid><dc:creator>Avvio VS 2005 | hilpers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.hilpers.it/2624670-avvio-vs-2005-a"&gt;http://www.hilpers.it/2624670-avvio-vs-2005-a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Somasegar s WebLog Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio | Paid Surveys</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#9659602</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 01:30:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9659602</guid><dc:creator> Somasegar s WebLog Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio | Paid Surveys</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=somasegar-s-weblog-visual-studio-2005-sp1-beta-and-visual-studio"&gt;http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=somasegar-s-weblog-visual-studio-2005-sp1-beta-and-visual-studio&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Somasegar s WebLog Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio | Quick Diets</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#9745266</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 17:01:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9745266</guid><dc:creator> Somasegar s WebLog Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio | Quick Diets</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://quickdietsite.info/story.php?id=327"&gt;http://quickdietsite.info/story.php?id=327&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Somasegar s WebLog Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio | debt solutions</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#9756854</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:32:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9756854</guid><dc:creator> Somasegar s WebLog Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio | debt solutions</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://debtsolutionsnow.info/story.php?id=4194"&gt;http://debtsolutionsnow.info/story.php?id=4194&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Somasegar s WebLog Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio | alternative dating</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx#9767670</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:17:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9767670</guid><dc:creator> Somasegar s WebLog Visual Studio 2005 SP1 Beta and Visual Studio | alternative dating</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://topalternativedating.info/story.php?id=64"&gt;http://topalternativedating.info/story.php?id=64&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>