http://blogs.msdn.com/spatdsg/archive/2007/11/14/kerberos-delegation-end-to-end-part-i.aspxFirst off let me say that I am not a “SQL guy” nor am I an “IIS guy” .. I am primarily a platforms OS kinda guy. However, I can wing my way thru some of those two technologies. This series of posts may not exactly follow best practices when it comes toen-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/spatdsg/archive/2007/11/14/kerberos-delegation-end-to-end-part-i.aspx#6241582Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:30:25 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6241582John Bates<p>Definitely informative, and the extra &quot;why?&quot; info is excellent for later debugging when a CxO is breathing down your neck :-)</p> <p>Keep 'em coming.</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/spatdsg/archive/2007/11/14/kerberos-delegation-end-to-end-part-i.aspx#6320638Sat, 17 Nov 2007 02:11:48 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6320638Mahmood<p>Great stuff Steve. Got a question for you. Launch Task manager on SQL server and you'll see that the sqlserver process memory usage doesnt reflect the real footprint. &nbsp;Real memory is only relfected through perf mon. Do you know why? It has to be an OS thing. ANy thoughts?</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/spatdsg/archive/2007/11/14/kerberos-delegation-end-to-end-part-i.aspx#6437093Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:41:28 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6437093SpatDSG<p>Well that question all depends on what you mean by &quot;real memory&quot; :) </p> <p>A rough answer would be that the task manager mem usage per process is reflecting the process working set. </p> <p>This sets up a great subject for a future post tho..thx again Mahmood.</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/spatdsg/archive/2007/11/14/kerberos-delegation-end-to-end-part-i.aspx#6487856Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:41:46 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6487856Spat's WebLog (Steve Patrick)<p>When we left off - I was about to install SQL. Also my standard disclaimer for this series: First off</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/spatdsg/archive/2007/11/14/kerberos-delegation-end-to-end-part-i.aspx#6597651Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:31:33 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6597651Venkat<p>Good Work and I learnt a quite a bit about setting up IIS and getting it ready.</p> <p>Well demonstrated proof of concept.</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/spatdsg/archive/2007/11/14/kerberos-delegation-end-to-end-part-i.aspx#8395090Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:20:23 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8395090Vu's Technical Notepad<p>Last week, I spent an all-nighter troubleshooting a Kerberos issue for a MOSS installation. Although</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/spatdsg/archive/2007/11/14/kerberos-delegation-end-to-end-part-i.aspx#8731768Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:12:06 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8731768Ray<p>Totally confusing. Where is the Kerberos delegation step?</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/spatdsg/archive/2007/11/14/kerberos-delegation-end-to-end-part-i.aspx#8741289Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:41:46 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8741289SpatDSG<p>well look at part 2 and 3 -- someday part 4.</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/spatdsg/archive/2007/11/14/kerberos-delegation-end-to-end-part-i.aspx#8992469Thu, 09 Oct 2008 08:37:38 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8992469Mirrored Blogs<p>So what&amp;#39;s on your SharePoint development machine? Sharepoint, Reporting services and Kerberos authentication</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/spatdsg/archive/2007/11/14/kerberos-delegation-end-to-end-part-i.aspx#9490202Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:22:18 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9490202sharepointlink<p>good post! I am a bit confused at the end, why kerberos doesn't fall back to NTLM before SPN is registered?</p> <p>thanks,</p>