<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Vardecimal Storage Format and its implications on Backup/Recovery</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlserverstorageengine/archive/2006/12/29/vardecimal-storage-format-and-its-implications-on-backup-recovery.aspx</link><description>Has any one tried restoring or attaching a SQL Server 2005 database on SQL Server 2000? You will find that SQL Server 2000 will fail this restore or attach. The reason is simple. SQL Server 2000 does not understand the physical structure changes in SQL</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Vardecimal Storage Format and its implications on Backup/Recovery</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlserverstorageengine/archive/2006/12/29/vardecimal-storage-format-and-its-implications-on-backup-recovery.aspx#1451728</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:12:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1451728</guid><dc:creator>rsocol</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I understand why it's needed to switch to simple recovery mode when you disable vardecimal storage format. But why is it needed for enabling it ? The log backups would be marked with the new version while vardecimal &amp;nbsp;storage is enabled, so they would not able to be restored on SP1, right ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Razvan&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Vardecimal Storage Format and its implications on Backup/Recovery</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlserverstorageengine/archive/2006/12/29/vardecimal-storage-format-and-its-implications-on-backup-recovery.aspx#1451956</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:56:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1451956</guid><dc:creator>Sunil Agarwal</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;RavzanL You are right. It is not needed for enabling. I read my BLOG again and I does not say that. Can you please clarify..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Vardecimal Storage Format and its implications on Backup/Recovery</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlserverstorageengine/archive/2006/12/29/vardecimal-storage-format-and-its-implications-on-backup-recovery.aspx#1478080</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:40:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1478080</guid><dc:creator>rsocol</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Books Online SP2 Dec CTP says:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Databases using vardecimal storage format must be set to the simple recovery model.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is in the &amp;quot;vardecimal storage format&amp;quot; topic (ms-help://MS.SQLCC.v9/MS.SQLSVR.v9.en/udb9/html/b4a37f9c-3b71-43bd-b64e-2bfb5c5817ba.htm), in the &amp;quot;Limitations&amp;quot; section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If this is an error in the documentation, please make sure that it will be corrected in the next version of BOL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Razvan&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>SQL Server 2005 SP2 では、decimal, numeric データ型利用時のディスクスペースが減る !? vardecimal とは.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlserverstorageengine/archive/2006/12/29/vardecimal-storage-format-and-its-implications-on-backup-recovery.aspx#1619092</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:42:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1619092</guid><dc:creator>河端善博の .TEXT でウェブログ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;SQL Server 2005 SP2 では、decimal, numeric データ型利用時のディスクスペースが減る !? vardecimal とは.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>