Stanley Tan's Blog

Microsoft's Allchin: Vista won't need antivirus

Microsoft co-president Jim Allchin has suggested that some Vista users will not need to run any third-party antivirus software.

Allchin made the comments in a telephone conference with reporters on Wednesday, according to betanews.com. He said that while there was no way of knowing that security perfection had been achieved in Vista, he was confident enough in the operating system to let his seven-year-old use a locked down version without antivirus.

http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/security/0,39044215,61966976,00.htm

 

The funny thing is that I've practically not run with anti-virus for the past (countless) number of years.  As I always say, security is only as strong as the weakest link.  If you safeguard your home to death but give your house key out randomly, that's not very secure, is it?  In the same way with computers, the weakest link is usually (unfortunately) between the chair and the computer.  Be smart -- you'll notice a huge improvement in security almost immediately.  ;-)

Published Tuesday, November 14, 2006 7:28 PM by StanleyTan

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

yizhe said:

I've never run any anti-virus in my life too (>10 years of computing). I do agree that the user (human) is always the weakest link in security (and also in any other things). Even the best security feature can't prevent someone who doesn't have the basic security awareness and good computing habits from ruining their system (e.g. installing a program on the web from a porn site which says it can help you boost your internet to lightspeed).

What an OS can do is just to make it real hard for users to do stupid things and I believe Vista has done enough of it. There's a balance between flexibility and protection; many people have complained about the over-zealous method that Vista use to prevent users from doing things that potentially may harm their computer. However, although majority of us who read this blog finds it a hassle, it does help those who just started out and it sure make people more conscious about security (provided they don’t disable the feature).

Running an anti-virus software doesn’t mean you will be 100% safe. Based on Murphy’s Law, even the best anti-virus software in the world cannot covers all aspect of preventing something harmful from infesting your machine (especially in this world where “zero-day vulnerability” exist). Only by having good computing habits and being security conscious along with some hints/protection from the OS, you can win this game.

November 14, 2006 8:41 AM
 

chun siong said:

i stopped running anti-virus years ago so that i could get the speed. yes, i'm the "optimisation" kind of person. viruses are not really a problem to me as i do my ghost image every fortnightly. security wise as in leaked passwords won't really affect me much as i prefer not to do internet banking services.

most of the people who approach me to help them has the problem of spyware, startup items clutter. l

many of my friends complain to me saying "microsoft windows sucks" ( this is a quote, not my personal opinion ) because they always have to do a reinstallation every now and then due to spywares/slowdowns/errors. as stanley always emphasizes, its not microsoft fault that you download something using internet explorer and installed a virus/spyware

i personally have not done a clean install since sp2? i do my patching, registry cleaning, defrag, and other maintenance stuff reguarly. yes, the problem usually lies between the chair and the keyboard.

according to http://virus.gr, no anti-virus has 100% detection rate. there are so many bias reviews of anti-virus out there but i do trust this source.

November 14, 2006 10:10 AM
 

Kyle Cowan said:

I myself have only ever had 1 virus, and that was the CIH.W32 virus which was accidently included with the original Back Orifice 2K CD produced by CDC.   Luckily, they alerted everyone to the Virus and it was easily removed from my system.

I currently run Windows Live OneCare as an antivirus, but, I don't really use that functionality.  I mostly use OneCare for its other Backup and Performance Tuning, which saves me the hassle of manually scheduling each function.

And, although there are all those security prompts in Vista, I don't seem to mind them as much.  I also have to say, they have greatly improved since Beta 1 where you were prompted by Explorer every time you accessed stuff on the Desktop, or on the root drive.

I am also starting to educate people on the reasons to switch over to Vista, and currently the #1 selling point is the Parental Controls, especially for parents of Pre-teens who love the Web Tracking functionality.

I hope to have a copy of the RTM Version soon after release.

November 14, 2006 10:53 AM

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 

  
Enter Code Here: Required
Submit

© 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use  |  Trademarks  |  Privacy Statement
Microsoft
Page view tracker