<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Microsoft 3.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecla01/archive/2008/11/02/microsoft-3-0.aspx</link><description>What I believe you actually saw last week at the PDC, if you looked carefully, was Microsoft 3.0 &amp;#160; The dust is now settling on PDC 2008 and more measured commentary is arriving . I’ve been waiting for this PDC for a long time and to see the reaction.</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Microsoft 3.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecla01/archive/2008/11/02/microsoft-3-0.aspx#9030476</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 05:19:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9030476</guid><dc:creator>Mary Jo Foley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you want the rights to &amp;quot;Microsoft 3.0,&amp;quot; Steve, they're all yours. Microsoft 2.0 is the end of the road for me (as far as tech books go)... mj&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft 2.0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-2-0-Plans-Relevant-Post-Gates/dp/0470191384/ref=sr_1_1/103-5143073-4533462?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1191883162&amp;amp;sr=1-1"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-2-0-Plans-Relevant-Post-Gates/dp/0470191384/ref=sr_1_1/103-5143073-4533462?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1191883162&amp;amp;sr=1-1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Microsoft 3.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecla01/archive/2008/11/02/microsoft-3-0.aspx#9032919</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:46:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9032919</guid><dc:creator>Sprague D</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Steve Gillmor saw this coming awhile back (and, I think, was the first to use the &amp;quot;turning the ship&amp;quot; metaphor): &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://gesturelab.com/?p=105"&gt;http://gesturelab.com/?p=105&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An exciting time to be a Microsoft customer...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Microsoft 3.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecla01/archive/2008/11/02/microsoft-3-0.aspx#9034245</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:09:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9034245</guid><dc:creator>D. Lambert</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't forget about the revenue model that drives Azure - this is no small part of the reason for this change:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.componentoriented.com/?p=348"&gt;http://blog.componentoriented.com/?p=348&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Microsoft 3.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecla01/archive/2008/11/02/microsoft-3-0.aspx#9035543</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:39:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9035543</guid><dc:creator>steve clayton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks Mary Jo but you set the bar too high for me to even think of attempting that :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>